Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 18,942
Really?!? Oh ...I was not fantasizing. I was expressing my opinion, deeply held, about how to treat fascists.
Really?!? Oh ...I was not fantasizing. I was expressing my opinion, deeply held, about how to treat fascists.
That will be a very unwise move. If he does not want the public to see it then that all but confirms wrongdoing on his part. In any case, I'm quite sure that the report will somehow find its way to the AP Wire before it is officially released.
Does POTUS's executive privilege override the house if they demand its release?
BTW, there is no reason for Mueller to stop dropping bombshells about the investigation in the run-up to the midterms: or is anyone running for Congress under investigation?
In at least one sense every Republican in both chambers of Congress is under investigation, if for no other reason than serial complicity in protecting Trump and his cronies.
And they know it.
How classy, to repeat the same old big fat lie I had just called out (and sorry for being 3 days late). You just lost a ton of respect in my mind.
No.autumn1971 called for the death of Trump, ...
Really?!? Oh ...I was not fantasizing. I was expressing my opinion, deeply held, about how to treat fascists.![]()
Everything in that post was true. Feel free to add whatever additional information you feel is relevant, but how can true facts be a lie? And if that's what loses respect from you, perhaps I'm better off without your respect.
True facts being used to support a lie that the foundation only used a few percent of its funds for charity.
True facts being used to support a lie that the foundation only used a few percent of its funds for charity.
The issue is that it is technically correct. The Clinton foundation does indeed only transfer a small amount of its funds to other charities.
Of course, that is used to support the unspoken lie that the remainder of the money goes into the hands of the Clintons, when it appears that the foundation does much of the work itself, as it itself is a charity.
May as well also hate on Charities that also do not transfer funds to.. other charities.
They return is disturbing, to say the least. Given a ‘charitable’ interpretation you would say that the Foundation is disastrously incompetent. A less kind interpretation would be that The Clinton Tax Charity is a fraud that simply exists to enrich it’s it’s employees and directors (who include, obviously, Bill and Hillary).
The issue is that it is technically correct. The Clinton foundation does indeed only transfer a small amount of its funds to other charities.
Of course, that is used to support the unspoken lie that the remainder of the money goes into the hands of the Clintons, when it appears that the foundation does much of the work itself, as it itself is a charity.
May as well also hate on Charities that also do not transfer funds to.. other charities.
You might simply add that Trump is a traitor, as defined by law. Done!
That will be a very unwise move. If he does not want the public to see it then that all but confirms wrongdoing on his part. In any case, I'm quite sure that the report will somehow find its way to the AP Wire before it is officially released.
Quit trying to act like Trump's a victim. Jesus Christ.
Trump has done worse than this by walking in on teenage models changing, and then bragging about it. By trying to move on married women, then bitching about it. By kissing women that have openly said it was unsolicited and unwanted (repeatedly), and several other accusations.
.
Wow, your ability to extract all of that information about my attitude amazes me.
I was asking an honest question which you completely diverted from and in a roundabout way, confirmed that if Trump did the same thing as Bill Clinton, it would not be okay because Trump is (insert insult).
Well Trump doesn't seem likely to be deposed on a civil case so questions that really should have been objected to and shot down as irrelevant are not going to catch him up.
Legally Clinton shouldn't have answered it because it was irrelevant.
Avenatti thinks differently. He believes he will get to depose Trump.