Representative Duncan Hunter indicted for stealing $250k from campaign

Checkmite

Skepticifimisticalationist
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Messages
29,007
Location
Gulf Coast
Today's indictments name Duncan Hunter, a congressman from California, and Margaret Hunter, his wife, for fraudulently appropriating more than a quarter million dollars from his political campaign to pay for personal goods and luxuries.

According to the 48-page indictment, the Hunters illegally used campaign money to pay for expenses that they could not otherwise afford from 2009 through 2016. The purchases allegedly included family vacations to Italy, Hawaii, Phoenix and Boise, Idaho; school tuition; dental work; theater tickets; and domestic and international travel for almost a dozen relatives. The Hunters also spent tens of thousands of dollars on smaller purchases, including fast food, movie tickets, golf outings, video games, coffee, groceries, home utilities, and expensive meals, the indictment alleged.

To conceal their personal spending, the Hunters mischaracterized the purchases in FEC filings as "campaign travel," "dinner with volunteers/contributors," "toy drives," "teacher/parent and supporter events," and other false descriptions, according to the indictment.

The House Ethics Committee was also investigating allegations of Hunter's improper use of campaign funds, but announced in March that it would continue to defer to the Department of Justice investigation.

Hunter has maintained in the past that he was not aware of the improper spending, and repaid his campaign committee roughly $60,000 to cover the expenses.
 
I'd hate to work for FOX today. Hmmm...come to think of it, I'd hate to work for FOX any day.

Let's specify FOX NEWS...soon to be one of the few parts of the FOX company owned by Rupert Murdoch after the Disney deal becomes final.
 
He is in a solid red district, so this won't have an direct impact in November. except for the additional embarrassment it causes.
 
He is in a solid red district, so this won't have an direct impact in November. except for the additional embarrassment it causes.

Not necessarily.

California election law does not provide a way for Republicans to replace Hunter with another GOP candidate and the only way to remove Hunter’s name from the ballot is by court order.
(LA Times)
 
Boise is quite a beautiful place, really. It's a gateway to a lot of the mountain resorts in Idaho.

Around Boise is spectacular actually. I love it around there...except there are too many Mormons.
 
Whoa! Do I understand this correctly? It seems as if a sure red seat will be lost because of this. Hunter cannot be replaced on the ballot and write-ins are not allowed in the General Election. But I guess the voters in this district could vote for a candidate under indictment.
 
Whoa! Do I understand this correctly? It seems as if a sure red seat will be lost because of this. Hunter cannot be replaced on the ballot and write-ins are not allowed in the General Election. But I guess the voters in this district could vote for a candidate under indictment.

Why wouldn't they? I'm betting it will be close.

The current GOP line there is that this is a witch hunt.

The right-leaning news I've been scanning is spinning a story that the prosecutors are Deep State, big babies still upset about Clinton losing and looking to avenge her incompetence by smearing an honest Republican candidate for minor unintentional accounting oversights.
 
Why wouldn't they? I'm betting it will be close.

The current GOP line there is that this is a witch hunt.

The right-leaning news I've been scanning is spinning a story that the prosecutors are Deep State, big babies still upset about Clinton losing and looking to avenge her incompetence by smearing an honest Republican candidate for minor unintentional accounting oversights.

Well, we will see. It's now Republican philosophy I guess to oppose the rule of law.
 
So Trump's first supporter on Capitol Hill has been indicted for insider trading, now his second for misuse of campaign funds. We know the RNC server was hacked along with the DNC's, but none of the dirt on Republicans was ever released.

Maybe it was used for blackmail purposes instead?
 
So Trump's first supporter on Capitol Hill has been indicted for insider trading, now his second for misuse of campaign funds. We know the RNC server was hacked along with the DNC's, but none of the dirt on Republicans was ever released.

Maybe it was used for blackmail purposes instead?

I've been thinking this for quite a while.:D
 
I'd hate to work for FOX today. Hmmm...come to think of it, I'd hate to work for FOX any day.

Nah, easy for them to solve by "accidentally" putting a D instead of an R next to his name.
 

Back
Top Bottom