You're not even being grossly pedantic correctly; she said choke, not choke to death, so no, no 'lethal weapon' status on their penis. Incorrect.
Sophistry. Strangling isn't always fatal either.
Children's toys and other objects often have choking hazard warnings on them. These warnings are there because choking kills. The labels say "Choking Hazard" not "Choking to Death Hazard". That's because most people (except, perhaps, people who think TERF isn't a slur and that women have penises
) know that choking (cutting off one's air supply) is often fatal.
Few people who aren't trans-exclusionary consider TERF to be a slur rather than a descriptive acronym, even if the R isn't always accurate, as we've already been over in this thread.
Racists also argue that terms like "Paki" are purely descriptive.
"Trans-exclusionary" is a propaganda term, not a neutral description of reality.
TERF is widely recognised as a slur, because that is what it is. It is not uncommonly prefixed with words like "Smash", "Kill", and "Shut down". Or as a prefix itself: "Die in a fire terf scum."
The tweet would have the exact same spirit if they typed out "Radical feminists who argue that trans women aren't women and should not be allowed in women's spaces" instead of TERF. Correctness dependent on subjective opinion.
The acronym TERF is propaganda, narcissistically pushing an aggressive, one-sided "men are women", "we're being excluded", "we're entitled to enter sex-protected spaces" opinion. It is normally uttered with a sneer.
When men enter women's sex-protected spaces, it is women and girls who end up being excluded from these spaces.
You can use the label "gender-critical feminists" if you don't want to be crudely abusive towards people who challenge your beliefs.
"Yeah, you can go choke on a bag of dicks" etc is universally understood as a general '**** off' insult. It's typically meant as 'you can do x for all I care' and more essentially 'I do not care what you think and it would be great if you stopped bothering me.' It does not even actually imply rape; "x can" isn't an imperative or a threat, it denotes that something is possible, allowed or invited. "Participants can email me for more details" is about something participants are invited do, not about something I am going to do to participants. Grammatically incorrect.
Fists posed to display knuckle tattoos don't usually imply violence beyond "look how tough I am to show people eight letters this way," as far as I know. They're not fightin' fists. But they are fists. Technically correct.
These fists punch TERFs.
It's interesting how seamlessly transactivist "women" have adopted the culture, language and behaviour of male violence and rape. It's almost as if they are actually unreconstructed, Twenty First Century men, despite outward appearances.
Non-consensual oral sex is rape.
A dictionary definition of 'choke' that is applicable to forcing an erect penis down someone's throat:
choke
verb (used with object)
to stop the breath of by squeezing or obstructing the windpipe; strangle; stifle.
