Cont: Brexit: Now What? Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
Another party could stand on a manifesto of ignoring the referendum result:

The promise was made by a previous government, and no party can tie the hands of future governments. That it's the same party is incidental. May is not bound to follow Cameron's promises.
 
May already did so in one election, but is thought unlikely to still be the leader for the next one.
 
No need for insults. If you've read my earlier posts then you already knew that you were wrong about me not understanding.

The current Conservative government won't renege as they know that would be seen as betrayal by their supporters and they wouldn't get reelected. They are already flirting dangerously with betraying their supporters by pushing the pseudo-remain Chequers policy.

Another party could stand on a manifesto of ignoring the referendum result: the party that tried that last election (Liberal Democrats) got soundly beaten; maybe some other minor parties also said similar. The two main parties both stood on manifestos of implementing the democratic choice made in the referendum. I suppose the Labour party could yet change its mind for the next election.


Ultimately this was the major flaw of the referendum. If Cameron hadn’t held it it would have come down to a party promising Brexit in a manifesto pledge in a general election. In fact such a party existed. It’s conceivable they could have won a future election and conducted the process as it should have been done.
 
In fact such a party existed. It’s conceivable they could have won a future election and conducted the process as it should have been done.

Based on the record of said party in any areas where they achieved any actual positions of authority, they probably wouldn't have been able to conduct the process of holding a piss-up in a brewery as it should have been done. It's almost a shame they didn't get a chance; they'd probably have ended up invoking article 55 by mistake.

Dave
 
Based on the record of said party in any areas where they achieved any actual positions of authority, they probably wouldn't have been able to conduct the process of holding a piss-up in a brewery as it should have been done. It's almost a shame they didn't get a chance; they'd probably have ended up invoking article 55 by mistake.

Dave

I now have a mental image of Rupert Murdoch in a black robe calling Gove, Johnson and Farrage on his Sky Holophone and ordering them to "Execute Order 66" !
 
Based on the record of said party in any areas where they achieved any actual positions of authority


Do you think that being an MEP - one of the elected UK representatives in the EU - is a position of authority? I don't think the EU is very democratic and the MEPs don't have much authority, so I don't think it is. In any case if all goes according to plan the UK won't have any MEPs after next March.

There are 18 elected UKIP Members of the European Parliament at the moment. Conservative also have 18, with Labour having slightly more (20). There are 73 UK MEPs altogether so there are a total of 17 from other parties.

The Wikipedia article where I got those numbers, the total is 72, not 73, so either I'm missing something or the Wikipedia article has a mistake
 
Last edited:
Everyone knew exactly what it would mean to remain in the EU. We've been a member for long enough to understand that. If some leave voters didn't understand what leave would mean, then that makes it even worse for the remain camp.

The abject bleating of Leaver supports at each and every revelation of what we are being excluded from suggests otherwise.
 
Some were. Some were selfish. Some were ignorant. Some were hoodwinked.

And some, despite the unfounded denials of the hard Brexiteers, wanted not to become part of a federal European state but were happy to remain within the customs union, in effect wanting to be in the EEC rather than the EU. Apparently they were supposed to vote "Remain," despite the rather inconvenient point that if they had, the referendum would have gone the other way.

Dave
 
But as Theresa May's intervention shows, "we" do want to........
Indeed. Back when, as Home Secretary, she was merely screwing up policing, the courts, immigration and other such trivia (rather than screwing up the entire country) she was distinctly hostile to the ECHR and actively advocated the UK leaving the Convention.

Given how commingled in UK law the Convention, the ECHR, the ECJ, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the HRA are, the idea that Brexit won't effect them is naive at best, wilful dishonesty at worst.
 
And some, despite the unfounded denials of the hard Brexiteers, wanted not to become part of a federal European state but were happy to remain within the customs union, in effect wanting to be in the EEC rather than the EU. Apparently they were supposed to vote "Remain," despite the rather inconvenient point that if they had, the referendum would have gone the other way.

Dave


The entire Leave campaign boiled down to insisting a Brexit could be delivered that provided all of the benefits of EU membership with none of the responsibilities. I am confident they did so in the expectation that they would be defeated and never have to deliver on those promises. The likes of Farage and Johnson would get to play hero to the 'Little Englanders' and advance their careers, instead Brexit has one way or another proved their undoing, shame the rest of us have to suffer the consequences.
 
Shame that few British policians have the guts to be honest and say "Leaving the EU would be a mistake",refuse to adapt it, and let the relection chips fall where they may.'
 
Shame that few British policians have the guts to be honest and say "Leaving the EU would be a mistake",refuse to adapt it, and let the relection chips fall where they may.'

At least you have one party that is pretty sane. Our opposition is hamstrung by Corbyn thinking that Brexit is a chance to found a glorious socialist republic.

Apparently even Momentum are getting annoyed with his lack of opposition to the Rees-Mogg Brexit vision.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom