• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
I appreciate your concern. The operative phrase is "to the world". Clearly proving hydrino technology to the world has not be achieved. It has been achieved even twenty years ago for those who have cared enough to take the experiments and theory at face value. With the SunCell the there will undeniable (to the larger scientific community) power production, energy production and hydrino hydride compound production. So not just the occasional hydrino hydride metallic bond in a crystal, measurable as it is. Not just tiny amounts of dihydrino gas trapped in a getter, measurable as it is. But bulk 'hydrino in a bottle'.

Science needs to be both falsifiable and repeatable. This is why it is not proven. Your whole at face value BS has nothing to do with the scientific method.

Alternative explanations for the anomalous results have certainly not been ruled out by Mills, nor has even the basics been repeated by other independent groups who then did their own falsification attempts. None of all that was done, and even Mills doesn't claim to have done it. You have brainwashed yourself in this regard.

It's even worse regarding the hydrino compounds BS. Neither a stray hydrino nor a mass amount "in a bottle" has ever been detected, period. You are making crap up. Even Mills proposes that these crystals SHOULD contain hydrinos, but none has ever actually been seen by anyone! Not even Mills.

Again, providing crystals for testing to detect predicted hydrino compounds is NOT the same as actually doing the tests and actually detecting them. And as I have discussed with you multiple times, hydrogen infiltration and embrittlement is not the same as hydrino compounds.
 
Last edited:
Damn that was good until the last sentence.
To some Mills doesn't have enough magic. To others, too much.


Tell the Andromedean seductress that Mills is already taken. Married with kids.


Divorced with kids actually. The kids live with their mom and have nothing to do with him. I don't believe he's seen them in years. Good for her.
 
Is the Great Randino cashing out?
4) This suggests that Randy is the owner of the property where Brilliant Light Power is located and pays himself ~$925,000 in rent yearly in addition to whatever salary he is paying himself as Chairman of the Board, President, and CEO Director. This type of arrangement is typically legal but would be a substantial portion of the investment income raised by Brilliant Light Power.

Minor update. A website that sources public records from the Secretary of State of Delaware and elsewhere (corporationwiki), lists Randy as the sole principal/officer for Blacklight Real Estate, confirming his sole ownership (other principals, if they existed, would need to be listed in the annual reports). Property records in New Jersey and Pennsylvania do not show any additional properties that Blacklight Real Estate owns (and so it has no other identifiable sources of income). But maybe it owns property in the Cayman islands? :D Blacklight Real Estate therefore appears to be a real estate holding company designed specifically to hold only the property where BLP is located.
 
Is the Great Randino cashing out?
5) The property where Brilliant Light Power is located is currently for sale from owner/user for $5,000,000 (see listing for 493 Old Trenton Rd, East Windsor, NJ on loopnet** which also has some fun photos). This would give Randy a cool $3,000,000 profit over his $2,000,000 1998 purchase price.


More details on the sale of BLP's headquarters/lab just for fun:

Building was renovated in 1991 and 1999.
Breakdown of space is as follows:
32,960 sf - lab space
11,300 sf - office
10,750 sf - cleanroom

Free standing, single story building with eight chemistry fume hoods, 6,400 sf of clean room space, 4,300 sf of 40' high bay area, lead-lined room and substantial utility infrastructure. Property is expandable. Excellent lab/assembly/electronic building. Headquarters image property with beautifully landscaped grounds. NJ Turnpike Exit 8 is directly accessible via Route 133 (Princeton-Hightstown Bypass). Minutes from Princeton Junction Train station.


The only reason I can think of for him to sell his (apparently) very profitable real estate holding is to make it easier to fully cash out in the next few years.
 
On the contrary Mills has published much about the particulars of hydrino hydride compounds.



He’s done that before too. At one point he was even raving about the explosives he could make from then.

It’s sad that you’re so incapable of seeing just how deeply worn the ruts are in his path. Yes, there are side tracks he takes now and then, but they’re all part of the same big loop.
 
It has been achieved even twenty years ago for those who have cared enough to take the experiments and theory at face value.


That’s not the argument of a scientist. That’s the argument of a con man or an idiot. Independent replication is so vital to real world science in part to filter out the idiots and con men.
 
That’s not the argument of a scientist. That’s the argument of a con man or an idiot. Independent replication is so vital to real world science in part to filter out the idiots and con men.
It's real it's all real you just have to believe. Cant you see that every time a scientist says "I Don't Believe In Hydrinos" There Is A Hydrino Somewhere That Falls Down Dead.
You monsters.
Quickly! Clap your hands for Mills, and shout at the top of your voice, "I believe in Hydrinos" and then wire Mills some money. Then and only then in 6 months to 8+ years may you be able to imagine owning your very own hydrino dust powered spotwelder.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I'm misremembering, but didn't Mills claim to have loads of Hydrino crystals awhile ago?


Maybe they all evaporated?

Or just floated off into the aether, back from whence they came.

Hope Mills includes that in the duty to disclose for selling the building. Posible hydrino contamination.
 
And once again, we must remind you that he does not, in fact, have patents on the basic means or producing hydrinos. And what few patents he does have on other hydrino-related topics only apply in those particular countries.

So researchers almost everywhere in the world are free to experiment on hydrino production, and characterization of hydrinos, free from any such patent problems.

And, I'll point out that, even if he did have patents such as you erroneously suggest he has, that would not be a bar to experimental use in most of the world. From the article you posted:

This addresses only the use of patents in the US. The US rules as discussed above have no effect anywhere else in the world. So, move to Canada and experiment to your hearts content, alleged scientists who desperately want to research hydrinos, but who are stymied by US patent jurisprudence*.


*and the irrational intransigence of an "inventor" who claims to have been trying to get scientists to accept his work for 30 years, but then threatens to sue anyone who tries to replicate it independently.


Perhaps you're joking. Of course BLP has filed patents and been granted patents on hydrino technology. Go ahead, advertise that you are trying to do hydrino chemistry and see what happens.

From the BLP website: The Company’s main priority is to file and obtain patents relating to the BlackLight Process, systems, and applications of the process. We have filed numerous patent applications worldwide regarding these embodiments to protect the technology as it has progressed to the current SunCell®, CIHT, and solid fuels technologies being pursued for commercial use.

"Irrational intransigence", good one. How about simply being protective of their technology and financial interests including those of their investors, like any company with substantial IP.

Patents do not prevent academia from engaging with Mill's findings. I know of no case of Mills refusing to let an academic institution investigate hydrino.
 
Yes, experiments show that Bell's inequalities do not hold.


Totally false.

The Bell inequalities do not assume quantum physics. The three physical assumptions from which those inequalities are derived are assumptions made by classical physics.

The fact that those inequalities do not hold therefore implies both of these things:
  • Classical physics cannot explain the experimental results (because classical physics assumes all three assumptions from which the inequalities are derived).
  • Any correct explanation of the experimental results must abandon at least one of the three assumptions (which is why no correct explanation can be classical).
The reason quantum physics is able to explain the experimental results is that quantum mechanics does not make all of the three classical assumptions that are used to derive the Bell inequalities.

Of course the Bell inequalities do not assume quantum physics. But they assume quantum statistics, or better put, quantum probability assumptions and formalism.

From Wiki, my bold:

Bell's Theorem: If the quantum mechanical formalism is correct, then the system consisting of a pair of entangled electrons cannot satisfy the principle of local realism.

If you want to go deeper into the matter check out

https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0604124.pdf
and
https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0602080.pdf
 
30 July 2018 markie: More unthinking support of the ignorance, delusions and lies in Mills book with an irrelevant video.

Nice 'Superconducting Quantum Levitation on a 3π Möbius Strip ' video of the irrelevant fact that magnetic fields can levitate superconducting objects.

Mills stupidity is that he has a proton in a charged sphere, the proton will be have no forces keeping it inside the sphere (for a uniform distribution of charges) and Mills does not address this high school science level flaw!

It's more than "can levitate superconducting objects". They are locked in place at a certain distance from the track. Otherwise the object would have left the mobius track due to centrifugal 'force'.
 
Science needs to be both falsifiable and repeatable. This is why it is not proven. Your whole at face value BS has nothing to do with the scientific method.

Alternative explanations for the anomalous results have certainly not been ruled out by Mills, nor has even the basics been repeated by other independent groups who then did their own falsification attempts. None of all that was done, and even Mills doesn't claim to have done it. You have brainwashed yourself in this regard.

It's even worse regarding the hydrino compounds BS. Neither a stray hydrino nor a mass amount "in a bottle" has ever been detected, period. You are making crap up. Even Mills proposes that these crystals SHOULD contain hydrinos, but none has ever actually been seen by anyone! Not even Mills.

Again, providing crystals for testing to detect predicted hydrino compounds is NOT the same as actually doing the tests and actually detecting them. And as I have discussed with you multiple times, hydrogen infiltration and embrittlement is not the same as hydrino compounds.


As I have said multiple times, you thinking that hydrino compounds are merely hydrogen infiltration is strange. We know what that looks like. Hydrino compounds and trapped dihydrino are not that.
 
More details on the sale of BLP's headquarters/lab just for fun:

The only reason I can think of for him to sell his (apparently) very profitable real estate holding is to make it easier to fully cash out in the next few years.


Your determination to impugn Mills' honor is handicapping your vision.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom