Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 64,110
Interesting what the death of another human being, justified by a ridiculous law, does to people.
It's insanity.
The law is not ridiculous, and it does not justify this killing.
Interesting what the death of another human being, justified by a ridiculous law, does to people.
It's insanity.
The law is not ridiculous.
Any law that increases homicide rates by 30% is ridiculous on its face.
“By this time a witness pulls up and everybody hears us going back and forth with one another. ... A witness goes in the store and he let the owner know that there was somebody out there messing with a woman in a car,” she said. “My man hears what’s going on, sees the guy yelling at me and I’m sitting in the car. My man is defending me and his children, so he pushes him down.
“The guy is on the ground and he pulls the gun out. ... My dude steps back 'cause my dude is fearing for his life -- all of us were,” she added.
You mean justified homicide?
Since the controversial law was implemented in 2005, Florida’s overall monthly homicide rate has increased 24.4% and the homicide by firearm rate is up 31.6%, according to the study, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The research backs up a similar study from 2013
“This doesn’t rule out the possibility that there might have been something else that happened the we don’t know about,” Humphreys says. “But the magnitude of the effect led us to believe that the only thing that could plausibly lead to that effect is ‘Stand Your Ground.’”
I watched the video. There is no audio. What I see is a man checking out a vehicle. He approaches the driver's side and then backs off a step or two and appears to be pointing out other parking spaces. He does not appear to be gesticulating too wildly. When the boyfriend comes out, the old guy is distracted by the vehicle door opening and does not see or react the the boyfriend coming at him. The boyfriend violently shoves the guy to the ground. We can't see if his head strikes the ground as it is blocked by the boyfriend's body. The guy on the ground goes for his weapon and shoots the boyfriend within 4 seconds of hitting the ground. We don't know what the boyfriend was saying before the guy shoots.
Speculation does not help.
By all accounts, he was loud enough to be noticed by everyone around him, and aggressive enough for the woman he was likely yelling at to get out of the car. If they wanted to charge him with a crime like "disturbing the peace", "menacing", or whatever, they would do so, which would mean he was committing a crime during the shooting. Boom, done, murder/manslaughter charge justified. I've seen plenty of people charged for far thinner reasons, this guy at least unquestionably shot and killed someone.
Park your jalopy in a handicap spot.
Someone tells you to move it.
Getting in screaming argument.
Hulking boyfriend blindsides guy twice his age.
Hulking boyfriend removed from gene pool.
Yeah, not too upset about this one.
(Ain’t that just like a guy who would park in a handicapped spot, he brought a shove to a gun fight)
Seems, like the deceased’s mistake was “parking” an armed man on his ass because his baby momma was too *********** lazy to park like a human being.
Here is the next stand your ground self defense shooting.
https://people.com/crime/dad-fatally-shot-after-defending-friend-racial-slurs/
Who wouldn't be afraid for the life after someone leaves a bar to confront them after they got thrown out of the bar. Totally legit legal shooting.
Does anyone think this guy would be out playing parking police if he wasn't armed? It takes a special kind of courage to be confrontational knowing that you have a gun hidden in your belt.
Legal or not, shooter is human garbage.
Several people in this thread seem to be forgetting that even if the "shove" was 100% wrong (legally, morally, financially, whatever) the shooting can very well still be determined to be unjustified. Even in Florida.
If they wanted to charge him with a crime like "disturbing the peace", "menacing", or whatever, they would do so, which would mean he was committing a crime during the shooting. Boom, done, murder/manslaughter charge justified.
if?
Of course it was 100% wrong.
"If" the Lothario wanted to protect his Lady Fair who was squatting in the handicapped parking lot, he could have interposed his bulk between the victim and the car, rather than blindsiding the victim.
It was 100% wrong UNLESS he was threatening the guys girlfriend with physical violence. Not sure we'll ever have definitive proof one way or the other on that.
Disagree. The deceased blindsided him and wrecked him. That would be 15 yards and an ejection for targeting. The guy who got blindsided seemed totally dazed.