• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Breaking: Mueller Grand Jury charges filed, arrests as soon as Monday pt 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Upchurch said:
Dude literally had to be legally forced to put economic sanctions on Russia[...]
Click to expand...

Not even that. He was forced into the sanctions, and then ignored them. It was only after the UK nerve agent attack that he actually implemented the sanctions, and then in a way that didn't actually hurt Russia at all.
 
phiwum said:
Your third point is precisely where I stand.
Click to expand...

You think we should allow Fox News to decide whether or not there will be an impeachment of the President? Because that's what point 3 says when you think about it.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
Not even that. He was forced into the sanctions, and then ignored them. It was only after the UK nerve agent attack that he actually implemented the sanctions, and then in a way that didn't actually hurt Russia at all.
Click to expand...

Speaking of sanctions... looks like there's some more action on that front, finally. Greatly, greatly delayed and conveniently right after Trump's G7 rant about how they should just let Russia back in (I had actually been wondering what at least seemingly anti-Russia thing the Administration would pull out after that, really). Whether they'll actually be enforced or be meaningful is yet another uncertainty.
 
Last edited:
Say, by the way, how is Mueller's case going against the "Russians"?

U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller warned that Russian intelligence services have active “interference operations” in the U.S. and asked a judge to limit the pretrial evidence provided to a Russian firm indicted over meddling in the 2016 election.
Click to expand...

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rder-protecting-evidence-in-russia-troll-case

D'OH!!!

I assume it never occurred to them that one of the defendants would appear and contest the charges, let alone mock them while doing so:

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Concord-June-8-Filing.pdf

see footnote 5
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
Say, by the way, how is Mueller's case going against the "Russians"?



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rder-protecting-evidence-in-russia-troll-case

D'OH!!!

I assume it never occurred to them that one of the defendants would appear and contest the charges, let alone mock them while doing so:

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Concord-June-8-Filing.pdf

see footnote 7
Click to expand...

There appears to be no footnote 7. Heading VII? Only goes to V. Page 7? Seems unremarkable.
 
The Big Dog said:
Say, by the way, how is Mueller's case going against the "Russians"?



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rder-protecting-evidence-in-russia-troll-case

D'OH!!!

I assume it never occurred to them that one of the defendants would appear and contest the charges, let alone mock them while doing so:

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Concord-June-8-Filing.pdf

see footnote 5
Click to expand...

I've never seen anything like this. An investigator working to stop foreign meddling in our election, and right wing supporters are happy that the investigation is being mocked? This is mind blowing. I guess we really get to see who the party of traitors is and it's been the GOP all along. Not really surprised though. Those that are usually the most traitorous wrap themselves in the flag.

Thank you for this, seriously. Mind blowing how pathetic politics in the US has become, and this is a specific example.
 
The Big Dog said:
Say, by the way, how is Mueller's case going against the "Russians"?



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rder-protecting-evidence-in-russia-troll-case

D'OH!!!

I assume it never occurred to them that one of the defendants would appear and contest the charges, let alone mock them while doing so:

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Concord-June-8-Filing.pdf

see footnote 5
Click to expand...

So Mueller claiming to have evidence of broader Russian interference than just this case, that pertains to continuing interference, is evidence that the "Russians" aren't behind it?

Checks out.
 
Tsukasa Buddha said:
So Mueller claiming to have evidence of broader Russian interference than just this case, that pertains to continuing interference, is evidence that the "Russians" aren't behind it?

Checks out.
Click to expand...

"So"..... oy vey.

No it shows that the indictments were a silly stunt and Mueller is going to end up with egg on his face when he finally dismisses the indictment against Concord.

Take a gander for a bit more flavor.

https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/05/04/mueller-russia-interference-election-case-delay-570627
 
The Big Dog said:
"So"..... oy vey.

No it shows that the indictments were a silly stunt and Mueller is going to end up with egg on his face when he finally dismisses the indictment against Concord.

Take a gander for a bit more flavor.

https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/05/04/mueller-russia-interference-election-case-delay-570627
Click to expand...
From wiki...
On May 8, 2017, President Trump announced his intent to nominate Friedrich to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, to a seat vacated by Reggie Walton who assumed senior status on December 31, 2015.[6][7] She was formally nominated on June 7, 2017.[8] On July 25, 2017, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on her nomination.[9] Her nomination was reported out of committee by voice vote on September 14, 2017.[10] On November 16, 2017, the U.S. Senate voted 93–4 to invoke cloture on Friedrich's nomination.[11] On November 27, the Senate voted 97–3 to confirm her to the District Court.[12] She received her judicial commission on December 1, 2017.
Click to expand...

And from your link...
In a brief order Saturday evening, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich offered no explanation for her decision to deny a request prosecutors made Friday to put off the scheduled Wednesday arraignment for Concord Management and Consulting, one of the three firms charged in the case.
Click to expand...
Highlighting mine...
 
plague311 said:
I've never seen anything like this. An investigator working to stop foreign meddling in our election, and right wing supporters are happy that the investigation is being mocked? This is mind blowing. I guess we really get to see who the party of traitors is and it's been the GOP all along. Not really surprised though. Those that are usually the most traitorous wrap themselves in the flag.

Thank you for this, seriously. Mind blowing how pathetic politics in the US has become, and this is a specific example.
Click to expand...

In fairness, they are often wrapping themselves in a traitorous flag, too.
 
LSSBB said:
From wiki...


And from your link...

Highlighting mine...
Click to expand...

Say maybe a thread lawyer could give a reason?

There are plenty in the article

Like saying that the defendant was not served when its lawyer was voluntarily standing in court?

What a bunch of jabrones
 
plague311 said:
I've never seen anything like this. An investigator working to stop foreign meddling in our election, and right wing supporters are happy that the investigation is being mocked?
Click to expand...

I see no evidence that TBD is a right wing supporter...

...or even an American. Hmmmm.....

LOL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom