Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories VI: Lyndon Johnson's Revenge

[JayUtah]

As hard as you're trying to make this about someone else, the problem still remains that you have laid no foundation for your claims that the U.S. intelligence community behaves in the way you claim, and has the capabilities, methods, and practices you claim. Since we've established you have no applicable personal experience, I've asked you substantiate your claims from some other acceptable basis. Can you do that?

Still waiting for Manifesto to answer me.

 

[manifesto]

Rubbish.

You are months, and even years behind.

When to make an assertion, provide evidence at the time you make it, or wait until you have the evidence ready before making the assertion.

We are keeping track of your lies bare assertions now, and you will be held to backing them up.... with evidence.

No. I provide additional information when requested to do so.

That’s the way it works.

 

[JayUtah]

THAT is an almost geniously contrived truism.

Are you seriously making such an argument? It's a self-evident fact that if two statements contradict, at most one of them can be correct.

 

[MicahJava]

Translation: You don't understand terminal ballistics

Fine, would you like me to explain it to you?

ETA;

Perhaps looking at these two together will help you to understand

[qimg]https://www.dropbox.com/s/qdki1cgvh3su3bh/JFK-Dox.jpg?raw=1[/qimg] [qimg]https://www.dropbox.com/s/x4lisdkhwy55k9h/Bullet%2BGel.gif?raw=1[/qimg]

As always, if you still don't understand, I can explain it to you.

Oh, okay, you don't even know how what you're talking about. Here is a skull marked by the autopsy pathologists, the lower mark is where they put it, the upper mark is where lone nutter revisionists place it.

[IMGw=500]https://i.imgur.com/h6hwSsn.jpg[/IMGw]

[IMGw=500]https://i.imgur.com/vqM66lU.jpg[/IMGw]

Do you understand the difference between 0 and 4?

 

[traxy]

Cite ONE thing I have made up, Hans.

If not, I’ll start listing all the lies you have been cought pants down telling.

LBJ being part of the assassination plot.

 

[JayUtah]

No. I provide additional information when requested to do so.

That’s the way it works.

It's simply not true in your case. Look at the post directly above yours I've quoted here.

 

[HSienzant]

Aren't you glad your pants don't actually catch on fire?

Hank

 

[RoboTimbo]

Why did Oswald murder Officer Tippitt and then go on to attempt to murder more officers in the theater with the same gun? Until you CTists can answer that, nothing else you say matters.

Still waiting for manifesto to answer me, too.

 

[HSienzant]

Oh, okay, you don't even know how what you're talking about. Here is a skull marked by the autopsy pathologists, the lower mark is where they put it, the upper mark is where lone nutter revisionists place it.

[IMGw=500]https://i.imgur.com/h6hwSsn.jpg[/IMGw]

[IMGw=500]https://i.imgur.com/vqM66lU.jpg[/IMGw]

Do you understand the difference between 0 and 4?

Do you understand that the images you cite are from 15 years after the fact?

How accurate are recollections then, in general?

Hank

 

[smartcooky]

No. I provide additional information when requested to do so.

OK then, I am now requesting additional information; being evidence for all the unsupported claims you have made.

 

[HSienzant]

Still waiting for manifesto to answer me, too.

Get in line. There's 44 cites to evidence and sources Manifesto owes me.

He acknowledged the bulk of them, even thanking me for listing them in one place. Within a few posts, he said he wouldn't respond to those requests because he didn't like the manner I requested them.

Hank

 

[traxy]

No, it is not. ”Slightly above EOP” is on the edge of EOP which is ca 11 cm below the (new) entrance wound ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE BACK OF THE HEAD.

If true, the old half blind janitor would be a better choice for high profile autopsies.

But, go ahead, cling along. It is at least entertaining in a non intended way.

Nope, not on the opposite side. Cowlick wound is on the upper right hand side of the back of the head, EOP wound was above and to the right.

I measured on my own head, the difference between my EOP and my cowlick was almost exactly 4 inches. A spot "slightly above and to the right" of my EOP was 2 and a half inches.

So yeah, a difference of around 2 inches, give or take.

 

[manifesto]

LBJ being part of the assassination plot.

LBJ was instrumental in the cover up of the assassination and that in a way that lead to the inescapable conclusion that he was in on it from the get go.

A plot of this magnitude can’t possibly succeede with an outsider in the White house.

That said, there is also more concrete evidence in the form of micro managing the investigations and witnesses coming forward implicating him in the conspiracy.

 

[RoboTimbo]

Do you understand the difference between 0 and 4?

Do you have an image from, say...

How about 1963?

 

[manifesto]

OK then, I am now requesting additional information; being evidence for all the unsupported claims you have made.

Be specific and while you are at it, provide the regulations from the 1963 time period that says that money orders did not have to be endorsed by the banks it went through.

 

[HSienzant]

LBJ was instrumental in the cover up of the assassination and that in a way that lead to the inescapable conclusion that he was in on it from the get go.

#45 - Cite the evidence. Explain it. Argue for its veracity.​

A plot of this magnitude can’t possibly succeede with an outsider in the White house.

#46 - Cite the evidence. Explain it. Argue for its veracity.​

That said, there is also more concrete evidence in the form of micro managing the investigations and witnesses coming forward implicating him in the conspiracy.

#47 - Cite the evidence. Explain it. Argue for its veracity.​

Hank

 

[HSienzant]

Be specific and while you are at it, provide the regulations from the 1963 time period that says that money orders did not have to be endorsed by the banks it went through.

Still Begging the Question and Shifting the Burden of Proof. You are claiming the money order is not legitimate. You need to establish it is not legitimate. You need to cite for the claim that banks have to endorse money orders.

#48 - Cite the evidence. Explain it. Argue for its veracity.​

Go ahead.

We covered the money order on a number of occasions going back two and a half YEARS (30 months).

Here's a recent one from a month ago where I linked to the earlier discussion.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12284929&postcount=2623

Hank

 

[manifesto]

Hank

Thats good Hank. Keeping up a good green face while your Mighty Church comes crumbeling down on you.

Never give up.

 

[RoboTimbo]

Cite ONE thing I have made up

LBJ was instrumental in the cover up of the assassination and that in a way that lead to the inescapable conclusion that he was in on it from the get go.

A plot of this magnitude can’t possibly succeede with an outsider in the White house.

That said, there is also more concrete evidence in the form of micro managing the investigations and witnesses coming forward implicating him in the conspiracy.

The hits just keep on coming .

Oops, I did it again. I replied with one of manifesto's own posts.

 

[traxy]

LBJ was instrumental in the cover up of the assassination and that in a way that lead to the inescapable conclusion that he was in on it from the get go.

A plot of this magnitude can’t possibly succeede with an outsider in the White house.

That said, there is also more concrete evidence in the form of micro managing the investigations and witnesses coming forward implicating him in the conspiracy.

You just made that whole thing up. Entirely conjecture with a fairy dust sprinkling of fevered imagination. Not a shred of facts to back it up.

Entirely fabricated. In other words, you're a liar.