Hank. Why are you trying to conflate me with someone else? Are you getting all this desperat not knowing it yourself?It's anatomically upwards, but it's downward based on the position of JFK's head at the time of the head shot.
Manifesto disagrees with you about the deflection. He says bullets can deflect 'to a considerable degree'.
Can I explain why you two disagree?
Your conspiracy theory has the bullet entering at the EOP. If a bullet could deflect upward, you don't have an argument for what the Z-film shows. So you argue bullets can't deflect.
Manifesto has a different theory he's pushing. In his theory, the bullet enters JFK's head above and to the right of the right ear, at approximately a 90 degree angle to the head. But he needs it to blow out the back of the head where you claim an entry wound was, so he needs it to deflect about 90 degrees to exit the back of the head. So he argues bullets can deflect to a considerable degree.
Neither of you has cited anything from a ballistics source to support your mutually exclusive claims. As a CT, you don't need that. All you need is to be able to support your own conspiracy claims, and you each do that by making up whatever argument you need to support your conspiracy theory.
So you end up with 'bullets can't deflect' to keep your theory alive and Manifesto ends up 'bullets can deflect considerably' to keep his alive.
Not because any evidence led you to those conclusions. Because you need those conclusions to be true to keep your two different conspiracy theories alive.
Hank
Getting old?
Or is it that since you belong to a Mighty Church (holy) where everybody acts and thinks like One hive mind, this is so everywhere else?
Well, I’ve got news for you.