• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories VI: Lyndon Johnson's Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
No. The point is that the witness testimony is as strong or stronger for shot/s from in front/knoll as for shot/s from behind/TSBD.

Corroborating evidence is the next step.

You made a tiny step in the right direction allowing "as strong as" there but I am afraid you will have to go further. Their testimony is weaker according to your own theory. The next step is for you to acknowledge this at the very least. Not only do they have to have been fooled about the direction according to your theory, most of them have to be have been fooled about the number of shots.
 
Oh good, amateur hour part two.

Show me his CIA pay-stubs, and not on microfilm.;)
Yes, why not release his IRS tax records? 54 years later and still withhold? Why is that?

The evidence are circumstantial and the conclusion that he had to be US Intel is the only reasonable explaining most of the evidence.

When ’trying’ to renounce his American citicenship in the US embassy in Moscow Oswald made overt threats of disclosing military secrets to the Soviets. Considering him being a radar operator stationed at bases from where CIA’s top secret U2-planes where stationed those ”military secrets” were far from trivial and the military had to change radar codes along the whole of the Pacific coast because of this threat.

1. Why was he not arrested on the spot in the embassy when making the threats?

2. Why was he not arrested the second he entered US territory when coming back from his ’defection’?

3. How did he know that the Soviet consulate in Helsinki could arrange visa on very short notice?

4. How did he get the money to pay for his travels and accomodations?

5. Why did the Red Cross pay him monthly when in Minsk?

6. Why did he get his passport back when making such a provokative defection and renounciation a couple of years earlier?

7. Why did the US State Department lend him the money for the journey home to the US?

8. Why was he not even debriefed by the CIA after leaving the Soviet Union?

9. Why was the State Department’s Otto Otepka obstructed and removed from his post when trying to find out if Oswald was part of CIA’s and Pentagon’s ”false defector” program?

I’ll stop there for now.
 
You made a tiny step in the right direction allowing "as strong as" there but I am afraid you will have to go further. Their testimony is weaker according to your own theory. The next step is for you to acknowledge this at the very least. Not only do they have to have been fooled about the direction according to your theory, most of them have to be have been fooled about the number of shots.
What? They were placed at the Houston-Elm intersection and if they heard shots from the direction of the knoll, it would be in perfect alignment to the tripple underpass.

Remember, ”the grassy knoll” was NOT a famous landmark in Dallas until months after the assassination.
 
Meanwhile, for the grownups in the room:

Trump pushes back final document release until 2021:

http://wtkr.com/2018/04/27/president-trump-pushes-jfk-assassination-records-deadline-to-2021/

Bill Newman is still around:

http://www.thegurdontimes.com/news/...ber-witnessing-kennedy-assassination---part-i

Pesky scientists doing sciency things to shut down the "Back and to the Left" thing that CT-morons go on and on about:

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lif...irms-bullet-was-fired-from-behind-by-lee.html

https://www.studyfinds.org/jfk-assassination-gunfire-grassy-knoll/

https://www.elsevier.com/about/pres...t-from-the-grassy-knoll-suggests-new-research

And the head-shot study itself:

https://www.heliyon.com/article/e00603


Yet another guy outed by the haphazard document release:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/article210234214.html

Oh, and the National Enquirer is running a story about three gunmen in Dealey Plaza because they're the National Enquirer and dumb people but tabloids.
 
The evidence are circumstantial and the conclusion that he had to be US Intel is the only reasonable explaining most of the evidence.

Based on your extensive research into US intelligence activities I'm sure.


When ’trying’ to renounce his American citicenship in the US embassy in Moscow Oswald made overt threats of disclosing military secrets to the Soviets. Considering him being a radar operator stationed at bases from where CIA’s top secret U2-planes where stationed those ”military secrets” were far from trivial and the military had to change radar codes along the whole of the Pacific coast because of this threat.

1. Why was he not arrested on the spot in the embassy when making the threats?

Because, unlike the Soviet Union, the United States in not a police state. I can walk up to my Congressman and tell him to shove it without fear of arrest.

2. Why was he not arrested the second he entered US territory when coming back from his ’defection’?

Defection is not against the law. We're not a police state.

3. How did he know that the Soviet consulate in Helsinki could arrange visa on very short notice?

The same way I know that getting a visa to visit Iran can take up to a year, but if I go to Iraq and drive to the border the guards will give me a visa on the spot for up to 2 weeks.

He asked.

4. How did he get the money to pay for his travels and accomodations?

Who cares? He wasn't flying first class nor staying at the Ritz.

5. Why did the Red Cross pay him monthly when in Minsk?

Because he was in a communist country.

6. Why did he get his passport back when making such a provokative defection and renounciation a couple of years earlier?

Because the USA is cool like that. US-born citizens cannot have their citizenship revoked.

7. Why did the US State Department lend him the money for the journey home to the US?

Good PR, and Oswald was broke.

8. Why was he not even debriefed by the CIA after leaving the Soviet Union?

Had the CIA needed to know about how the Soviets made TV sets they would have called. Had Oswald been important they would have met him at the airport. The fact is that at that time the CIA knew more about the Soviet Union than Oswald did, and that's why Oswald left.

9. Why was the State Department’s Otto Otepka obstructed and removed from his post when trying to find out if Oswald was part of CIA’s and Pentagon’s ”false defector” program?

Was he?
 
What? They were placed at the Houston-Elm intersection and if they heard shots from the direction of the knoll, it would be in perfect alignment to the tripple underpass.

Remember, ”the grassy knoll” was NOT a famous landmark in Dallas until months after the assassination.

My point...............>

Your head :confused:

Similar to your witnesses. You missed it!
 
Last edited:
Is this another instance where the rules are different for Oswald than for everyone else?

Hank
You mean ”guilty until proven innocent”? No, I wonder who would be harmed by a disclosure of his tax records.

Oswald is dead since 54 years, so whom are we protecting?
 
Oh, and the National Enquirer is running a story about three gunmen in Dealey Plaza because they're the National Enquirer and dumb people but tabloids.
I like how their proposed shooting sequence is literally impossible.

[IMGw=800]https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-E2hb77-ctcs/WveH46-QDtI/AAAAAAABOxY/tWM0VvAadL4K7QVpHlJoZW2VfjDii9PnQCLcBGAs/s1600/National-Enquirer-May-2018.jpg[/imgw]
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, for the grownups in the room:

Trump pushes back final document release until 2021:

http://wtkr.com/2018/04/27/president-trump-pushes-jfk-assassination-records-deadline-to-2021/

Bill Newman is still around:

http://www.thegurdontimes.com/news/...ber-witnessing-kennedy-assassination---part-i

Pesky scientists doing sciency things to shut down the "Back and to the Left" thing that CT-morons go on and on about:

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lif...irms-bullet-was-fired-from-behind-by-lee.html

https://www.studyfinds.org/jfk-assassination-gunfire-grassy-knoll/

https://www.elsevier.com/about/pres...t-from-the-grassy-knoll-suggests-new-research

And the head-shot study itself:

[b]https://www.heliyon.com/article/e00603[/b]


Yet another guy outed by the haphazard document release:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/article210234214.html

Oh, and the National Enquirer is running a story about three gunmen in Dealey Plaza because they're the National Enquirer and dumb people but tabloids.

Yes completely disproving a shot from the right front. As manifesto indicated
No, it couldn’t. All known decerebrate reflexes are way too delayed. JFK’s head snaps violently backwards as if hit by a baseball bat. Instantaneously.

Exactly the result of the scientific study, caused by the reaction to brain matter loss from a shot from the rear. A shot from the front would have the opposite effects as filmed.
 
Based on your extensive research into US intelligence activities I'm sure.
No. Based on my extensive reading of the research published in books, articles and documentary film, the last 50 plus years.

Because, unlike the Soviet Union, the United States in not a police state. I can walk up to my Congressman and tell him to shove it without fear of arrest.
Nonsense. It is against the law even to threatening of revealing military secrets to a foreign state. Oswald was still formally in the Marines and considering his knowledge of radar installations all over the Pacific theater and in proximity to the top secret U2 flights over China and Soviet, he should have been arrested on the spot, brought back to the US, court marshalled and put away for a very long time.

If it not were a well rehersed act, that is.

Defection is not against the law. We're not a police state.
See above.

The same way I know that getting a visa to visit Iran can take up to a year, but if I go to Iraq and drive to the border the guards will give me a visa on the spot for up to 2 weeks.

He asked.
What? How did Oswald know that Helsinki was the only place in the world where he could get a visa to the Soviet Union in a couple of days, when this knowledge was restricted to a very limited few belonging to the State Department and the CIA?

Who cares? He wasn't flying first class
He had to been flying from London to Helsinki if the documented time schedule is correct. Problem is, no comercial flights was available at the time period Oswald stayed in London.

So, who flew him to Helsinki?

nor staying at the Ritz.
He stayed at the two most expencive hotels in Helsinki.

Because he was in a communist country.
What? Why would the Red Cross support a US Marine defecting to communist Soviet Union? He earned more than the boss of the factory he worked in, in Minsk.

The Red Cross doubled that sum, making him one of the most afluent factory workers in recorded time. Why?

Because the USA is cool like that. US-born citizens cannot have their citizenship revoked.
Can they not? But they can have their passports withdrawn if they threatens to commit treason, couldn’t they?

Good PR, and Oswald was broke.
A Marine defecting to the enemy, renouncing his citizenship, threatening to disclose all he knows from his service as a radar operator in the Pacific, next door to CIA’s most top secret U2 spying over same Soviet enemy, and they pay for his and his new family’s return ticket back home? No questions asked?

Are you kidding me?

Had the CIA needed to know about how the Soviets made TV sets they would have called. Had Oswald been important they would have met him at the airport. The fact is that at that time the CIA knew more about the Soviet Union than Oswald did, and that's why Oswald left.
Lol. They were not interested in what Oswald may have disclosed to the enemy? How about the U2 being shot down over Russia a couple of months after Oswald defected? How about all the radar codes and everything else he could have given the enemy?

CIA was not, interested? Are you kidding?

Yes.
 
Did you forget to cite where the HSCA determined that the brain was removed through a five inch hole?

1. The HSCA said the entry wound and exit wound were 5 inches apart.

2. The HSCA said that both holes in the skull could be seen at the same time on the open-cranium photographs.

3. The cranium is empty in the open-cranium photographs.
 
1. The HSCA said the entry wound and exit wound were 5 inches apart.

2. The HSCA said that both holes in the skull could be seen at the same time on the open-cranium photographs.

3. The cranium is empty in the open-cranium photographs.

Those statements may or may not be accurate, however I asked for a citation not your interpretation.
 
Yes completely disproving a shot from the right front. As manifesto indicated
Where did I ”indicate” this?

Exactly the result of the scientific study, caused by the reaction to brain matter loss from a shot from the rear. A shot from the front would have the opposite effects as filmed.
Why?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom