• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Such blatant expressions of violations of known physical laws are rare. Most people who are trying to sneak a free energy/cold fusion/perpetual motion machine through the patent process try to obscure their intent with vague wording. Even in cases where the examiner at the International stage thinks they might be trying to pull a fast one, they usually just leave it up to the later National level examiners to get into that argument, because there just isn't enough time at during the International phase for a lot of such back-and-forth.

So the fact that in this case, the examiner decided to make a point of raising this objection tells you how obviously BS his claims are.

Or how scared TPTB is. :jaw-dropp :rolleyes:
 
You say that, and yet:

For over 25 years Mills has left an undeniable trail of experimental evidence to show the hydrino exists. Spectral signatures from hydrino formation, tests confirming hydrino end product, large excess heat from calorimetry tests, controlled tests showing necessity of both atomic hydrogen and predicted catalysts. All in vast range of conditions: gas, plasma, aqueous, and solid environments and with results that have been validated by others and in accord with a predictive theory.

Well he's certainly left a trail of something.... He must go through a lot of kitty litter.

It is to laugh that you think claims that continue to be unsubstantiated count as evidence.

Of course, you have no pecuniary interest in whether Mills continues to blather physics-sounding terms in perpetuity, do you...
 
He nows it, thens it, and wills it.



Just watch. It’ll turn out Markie is a sock puppet for Mills. Once that’s revealed I won’t be able to say things like “Mills is a moron who wouldn’t know actual science if it jumped up and bit his knob off while he was cornholling one of his investors.”

Well, I won’t be able to post that here anyway.
 
"To market, to market, to buy a fat pig,
Home again, home again, jiggety-jig.
To market, to market, to buy a fat hog,
Home again, home again, jiggety-jog.
To market, to market, to buy a plum bun,
Home again, home again, market is done... "
 
Heavens no, we wouldn't want to violate the Standard Model or General Relativity or Quantum Field Theory would we? The entire universe would collapse if they were wrong. Of a certainty, the 3 models may not seem to mesh together ; perhaps they appear to give us a disjointed view of the universe. Perhaps they cannot predict basic things like the ionization energy of Lithium's outer electron or the accelerated expansion of the universe. But the problem is our human weakness in not properly understanding what our Science has revealed to us. All hail what our Science has wrought! The glorious Trinity, full of mystery of how the 3 theories could exist in one ScienceHood! And while we're at it, Hail Mary, the Equivalence Principle! May she be forever blessed. She says that antigravitic matter cannot exist, and we bow before her pronouncement. Down with the heretics who would say otherwise!

When it happens then Mills will be acclaimed, until then we can enjoy the breeze from your waving your arms about furiously.
:)
 
Actually, it'd be awesome if someone did that. But they'd need to produce falsifiable, independently-replicable evidence, which is where Mills falls down.

It never ceases to amuse me when cranks or scam artists claim that they are being repressed by scientists defending the dogma of currently accepted theories. The truth is that finding a verifiable, repeatable phenomenon that can't be explained by current theories will get a scientist fame and likely a tenured position (if they don't already have one). Formulating a new theory, which is mathematically consistent, explains the exception(s), and also fits existing data supporting the current theory, will get them a Nobel Prize. They not only have no understanding of how the universe works, they have no understanding of how science works.

Of course, none of the cranks and scam artists are capable of doing the first, let alone the second of these.
 
It never ceases to amuse me when cranks or scam artists claim that they are being repressed by scientists defending the dogma of currently accepted theories. The truth is that finding a verifiable, repeatable phenomenon that can't be explained by current theories will get a scientist fame and likely a tenured position (if they don't already have one). Formulating a new theory, which is mathematically consistent, explains the exception(s), and also fits existing data supporting the current theory, will get them a Nobel Prize. They not only have no understanding of how the universe works, they have no understanding of how science works.



Back when I was an undergrad, we had one professor who had an experiment that suggested that neutrinos had a measurable mass. That was just an odd anomaly, until another lab produced the same result, when trying to replicate his work.

At that point, there was talk of Nobel Prizes and such, because finding that neutrinos had mass would upset quite a lot of the then-current theories about how subatomic particles worked. No one went running around trying to "suppress" his work; in fact, for a few weeks, he was the talk of the town.

But only for a few weeks, because that's when they finally figured out where the anomalous results were coming from.

And of course, he accepted that result. He didn't start promoting conspiracy theories about how everyone was out to get him and his Newtrinos(tm).


ETA: here's a contemporary paper discussing it:

http://inspirehep.net/record/405749?ln=en

ETA 2:

And if you google "17 keV Neutrino", you'll see that there was quite a lot of public discussion of this anomaly, both for and against it.
 
Last edited:
You say that, and yet:

For over 25 years Mills has left an undeniable trail of experimental evidence to show the hydrino exists. Spectral signatures from hydrino formation, tests confirming hydrino end product, large excess heat from calorimetry tests, controlled tests showing necessity of both atomic hydrogen and predicted catalysts. All in vast range of conditions: gas, plasma, aqueous, and solid environments and with results that have been validated by others and in accord with a predictive theory.

Even if we grant you your claim...

All of this evidence is connected to Mills himself.

There's absolutely no independent evidence whatsoever.

All of the evidence traces back to Mills.
 
For over 25 years Mills has left an undeniable trail of experimental evidence to show the hydrino exists. ...
Which is a lie because you know that his "evidence" is deniable.
Spectral signatures that have other explanations including possible fraud or at least ignorance. A lie of "tests confirming hydrino end product". Any "large excess heat" with other explanations.

Many items of ignorance, delusions and lies in Mills book and a paper

Items of ignorance and some lies from markie from his blind faith in Mills.
4 July 2017 markie: Did you recognize the many ignorant fantasies in that May 2017 PDF?
...
19 October 2017 markie: A "GUTCP far outclasses QM in its predictive ability" lie.
 
Which is a lie because you know that his "evidence" is deniable.
Spectral signatures that have other explanations including possible fraud or at least ignorance. A lie of "tests confirming hydrino end product". Any "large excess heat" with other explanations.

Many items of ignorance, delusions and lies in Mills book and a paper

Items of ignorance and some lies from markie from his blind faith in Mills.

Mills is banking on people not reading beyond the abstract.




It's been a lucrative strategy for close to 30 years.
 
Back when I was an undergrad, we had one professor who had an experiment that suggested that neutrinos had a measurable mass. That was just an odd anomaly, until another lab produced the same result, when trying to replicate his work.

At that point, there was talk of Nobel Prizes and such, because finding that neutrinos had mass would upset quite a lot of the then-current theories about how subatomic particles worked. No one went running around trying to "suppress" his work; in fact, for a few weeks, he was the talk of the town.

But only for a few weeks, because that's when they finally figured out where the anomalous results were coming from.

And of course, he accepted that result. He didn't start promoting conspiracy theories about how everyone was out to get him and his Newtrinos(tm).


ETA: here's a contemporary paper discussing it:

http://inspirehep.net/record/405749?ln=en

ETA 2:

And if you google "17 keV Neutrino", you'll see that there was quite a lot of public discussion of this anomaly, both for and against it.

Excellent example of how the world really works.
 
(snip)
BLP has not yet attained a working Suncell even for generating thermal energy. (This awaits a completed ceramic version of Sun-cell which apparently doesn't have to be enclosed in a larger pressure vessel.)
(Bolding mine)

So that's Mills' latest dodge. He apparently has a working SunCell, but now needs to invent a ceramic version of it. Because, of course, ceramics are the latest thing in science.
 
(Bolding mine)

So that's Mills' latest dodge. He apparently has a working SunCell, but now needs to invent a ceramic version of it. Because, of course, ceramics are the latest thing in science.

Always one more excuse. Always one more delay. 30 years and still the fools flock to his droppings, convinced by his words that they're eating chocolate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom