• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories VI: Lyndon Johnson's Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
manifesto said:
You have to show/explain what it could be if not a white motorcycle helmet.
Click to expand...

Nobody has to disprove your claims.

Which is your favorite logical fallacy, Manifesto?

  • Ad Hominem
  • Begging the question
  • Shifting the Burden of Proof
  • If I Ran the Zoo
  • All of the Above

Hank
 
traxy said:
Nope.

https://imgur.com/a/F5hxahE

It's negligible. A matter of inches, if the helmet is taller at all.

You can't tell within a matter of inches how high your white blob is because the resolution of the video is too poor. Therefore that blob could be anything.
Click to expand...
I see that you found one with an angle from above.

Did you have too look around a lot before finding it? Making an effort?

Here is a correct angle. (2.23) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b9ZDVD-vq-w

A head/helmet higher.
 
HSienzant said:
But to answer your question, I imagine there's two possibilities:
1. Google is now part of the massive world-wide conspiracy now.
2. McAdams' site is well-organized, has well-written articles, and lays out the evidence in an easy to access format, so people utilize it a lot.
Click to expand...

There is also a third possibility; the way the Google works for the user

3. If you follow a lot of links to a site or use that site a lot from your own searches, then Google prioritizes that site in YOUR search results for related information.
 
I made a gif of the moment in question.

https://gph.is/2Kcvz5e

The spot where the wheel is supposed to come into view shows something long and white. It's one of the white follow-up cars.
 
May I take this opportunity to remind all participants to dial down the accusations of lying. Remain civil and polite, and do not attack your fellow posters.

As it is, this thread is very close to being put on moderated status. Please help to avoid this by ensuring that you post in accordance with the MA.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Agatha
 
Do you ;) have an eye witness to it being...what? Using manifesto logic I can simply claim that the assassination was carried out by me, Lord Twonk, in order to advance the agenda of replacing the intergalactic blorbs with a more biddable species.

Sure that is a stupid claim, and manifesto will not understand it in the slightest, but there is hope that some casual reader will realise how bovine the arguments put forth by manifesto actually are.
 
I'm still chuckling over the whole "Oswald was fleeing from the real Tippit killer" theory. I can honestly say I've never heard that one before.
 
manifesto said:
2.24 = proof of one head with helmet higher than the JFK limo windshield.
Click to expand...

Nope, it's not nearly that much.

How tall is the white blob?

Doesn't matter anyway. The spot with the red arrow that claims to show a wheel actually shows something long and straight and white passing behind the legs of the bystanders on Houston street. No chance that's a motorcycle. If its a vehicle at all, it's the bottom trim of one of the white follow up cars.
 
traxy said:
I'm still chuckling over the whole "Oswald was fleeing from the real Tippit killer" theory. I can honestly say I've never heard that one before.
Click to expand...

He was the white and much slower OJ Simpson. Oswald was so scared that the real killer was chasing him that he took off his jacket and left it so the killer wouldn't recognize him. That's the ticket.:D
 
traxy said:
I'm still chuckling over the whole "Oswald was fleeing from the real Tippit killer" theory. I can honestly say I've never heard that one before.
Click to expand...
I’m stating that as a possibility since there are witnesses speaking of more than one individual + Tippit on the scene.

That said, my contention is that the testimonies identifying Oswald are given under circumstances that are highly dubious:

1. There are reports of intimidation and one case of attempting murder (Reynolds) where the victim changed his mind and suddenly remembered after being shot in the head!

2. The line up was a joke with an Oswald having a torn T-shirt and a black eye and who is loudly protesting the line up mismatch while the witnesses are observing/hearing him do so.

3. The identifications using photos of Oswald was done after same Oswald had been in the news constantly AS THE KILLER OF J.D. Tippit.

4. Mrs. Markham, the Commission ’star witness’ in the Tippit shooting having seen the arrested Oswald in the TV news, after much hesitation and ammonia in a state of hysteria, identified ”number two” in the line up:
"I asked... I looked at him. When I saw this man I wasn't sure but I had cold chills run all over me ... when I saw the man. But I wasn't sure."​

To name but a few of all the problems in the positive ID of Oswald in connection to the murder of Tippit.
 
manifesto said:
I’m stating that as a possibility since there are witnesses speaking of more than one individual + Tippit on the scene.

That said, my contention is that the testimonies identifying Oswald are given under circumstances that are highly dubious:
Click to expand...

Aren't you ;) glad we have the murder weapon he used to kill Officer Tippit still on him at the movie theater where he tried to murder more officers with it when they cornered him?

Do you ;) have a credible eyewitness to someone else murdering Officer Tippitt with Oswald's gun and then giving the gun back to Oswald so he could attempt to murder more officers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom