Cont: The Trump Presidency VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
logger said:
What’s bizarre, I’m just ecstatic over it.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is bizarre that you're ecstatic over an article that says, basically, nothing. Just the thought that if Trump does something that there's no indication that he is actually doing then it might possibly work out to the Republican party's benefit depending on if he gets it done in record time and with better nominees than he's thus far put forwards for almost anything else seems to have you all worked up with joy.

You really do lap up absolutely anything they spoon-feed to you, don't you?
 
Trump is endorsing again.

" .@JimRenacci has worked so hard on Tax Reductions, Illegal Immigration, the Border and Crime. I need Jim very badly to help our agenda and to keep MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! He will be a fantastic Senator for the Great State of Ohio, and has my full endorsement"

Poor Jim
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
Yes, it is bizarre that you're ecstatic over an article that says, basically, nothing. Just the thought that if Trump does something that there's no indication that he is actually doing then it might possibly work out to the Republican party's benefit depending on if he gets it done in record time and with better nominees than he's thus far put forwards for almost anything else seems to have you all worked up with joy.

You really do lap up absolutely anything they spoon-feed to you, don't you?
Click to expand...

It’s fascinating how you can type words that mean nothing. Let’s try again, Trump has a chance to change this liberal court into a right leaning court. Yes I’m very happy to be able to defeat the left again, especially this way.
 
SezMe said:
I agree, it was. To the detriment of the USA. McConnell has, through this action and many others, shown that he doesn't give a **** about the country. His only concern is his Senate seat and the dominance of his party. IMO, when history is written, McConnell will be found to have done more damage to democracy and the USA than even Trump - which is saying a lot.
Click to expand...

Defeating the left is the best thing for the country. What you cause the republicans of is exactly what your side is guilty of. The left hates this country, which is why they’re constantly trying to change it.
 
phiwum said:
With due respect, repeated posts consisting of "No." do not contribute to anything approaching conversation.

If you find logger's claims too silly to rebut, then please just ignore him. Thanks.
Click to expand...

It’s better then his usual post of calling me a fascist.
 
logger said:
It’s fascinating how you can type words that mean nothing. Let’s try again, Trump has a chance to change this liberal court into a right leaning court. Yes I’m very happy to be able to defeat the left again, especially this way.
Click to expand...

He's also got a chance to send a man to the moon. It's meaningless unless there's any indication that that's something he's actually trying to do.
 
logger said:
The left hates this country, which is why they’re constantly trying to change it.
Click to expand...

Aren't you constantly praising Trump for being the president who has accomplished the most while in office? Doesn't that mean that he's changed things more than any other president? How can changing things be simultaneously a good and a bad thing?
 
acbytesla said:
You previously said it was strategy that caused the Republicans to hold up nominations. Now you are saying they were 'too extreme which is hardly the case. Garland wasn't close to what might be described as extreme. The American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary gave Garland a "unanimously well-qualified" committee rating, its highest.[26] Garland is considered a judicial moderate and a centrist.[38]
Click to expand...

And he had been McConnells example of exactly who he wanted Obama to nominate as someone who would have no trouble getting through.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
Aren't you constantly praising Trump for being the president who has accomplished the most while in office? Doesn't that mean that he's changed things more than any other president? How can changing things be simultaneously a good and a bad thing?
Click to expand...


Schroedinger's ideology.
 
logger said:
It’s completely made up. Obama’s Presidency didn’t accomplish very much at all. There is clear bias when you see him near the top and in front of Reagan. Trump is just getting started, to show him in this survey is more proof it’s BS.
Click to expand...
And your scholarly credentials for making an evaluation were obtained where, Trump University?
 
logger said:
Defeating the left is the best thing for the country. What you cause the republicans of is exactly what your side is guilty of. The left hates this country, which is why they’re constantly trying to change it.
Click to expand...

Then you did not comprehend sezme's post at all. Sez accused the republicans of having no interest in the country and only want individual power. You are saying the Democrats want to change America. That means democrats are not guilty of what sez accused republicans of.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
Aren't you constantly praising Trump for being the president who has accomplished the most while in office? Doesn't that mean that he's changed things more than any other president? How can changing things be simultaneously a good and a bad thing?
Click to expand...

I don’t think it would be productive to explain something so simple as this.
 
logger said:
Garland was a very important pick to block. Well qualified doesn’t have anything to do with a judges political leanings. These others were obviously too extreme for republicans to move them forward.
Click to expand...

Your argument only makes sense if your objective is to stack the court with partisan extremists.
 
logger said:
It’s completely made up. Obama’s Presidency didn’t accomplish very much at all. There is clear bias when you see him near the top and in front of Reagan. Trump is just getting started, to show him in this survey is more proof it’s BS.
Click to expand...

If Obama's Presidency didn't accomplish very much (in other words, if Obama's Presidency didn't effect significant change), then why did Trump need to #MAGA?
 
Brainiac said:
Your argument only makes sense if your objective is to stack the court with partisan extremists.
Click to expand...

Geez, you found me out! Of course I don’t look at my side as partisan extremists. All I want them to do is interpret the constitution as our founders intended.

Do you think that is extreme?
 
Brainiac said:
Your argument only makes sense if your objective is to stack the court with partisan extremists.
Click to expand...

I don't know if you've noticed, but that is exactly what logger wants. He'll phrase it as 'stopping the leftists' but the reality is that even non-Trump serfs who are Republicans are 'leftists', which leaves it in the exact same place. logger is not shy about that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom