Cont: The Trump Presidency VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Somehow we went from Obama’s failure to get judges through, which leaves it up to president Trump. To liberal historians telling us how great Obama’s Presidency was. Which is in the process of being erased.

Do you understand how sentences work?

Periods have a purpose, man.
 
It’s completely made up. Obama’s Presidency didn’t accomplish very much at all. There is clear bias when you see him near the top and in front of Reagan. Trump is just getting started, to show him in this survey is more proof it’s BS.

Trump is going to go down in history in the bottom 5 Presidents in history. I'd say he'll be the worst. But there were a few really really bad Presidents like Buchanan, Harding and Andrew Johnson. But give Trump time.
 
Trump is going to go down in history in the bottom 5 Presidents in history. I'd say he'll be the worst. But there were a few really really bad Presidents like Buchanan, Harding and Andrew Johnson. But give Trump time.

Of course I think that’s ridiculous. Trump has great ideas, those ideas if allowed to be passed will make this country much better. What he’s passed already has had huge impacts for the good. If he survives these investigations, you’re going to see Him settle in to making more great policy’s.
 
Of course I think that’s ridiculous. Trump has great ideas, those ideas if allowed to be passed will make this country much better. What he’s passed already has had huge impacts for the good. If he survives these investigations, you’re going to see Him settle in to making more great policy’s.

That's a *********** stupid comment on every level.
Keep it up.
I need a laugh.
 
Of course I think that’s ridiculous. Trump has great ideas, those ideas if allowed to be passed will make this country much better. What he’s passed already has had huge impacts for the good. If he survives these investigations, you’re going to see Him settle in to making more great policy’s.

GEEZ, I can't think of a single good idea Trump has. Not a one. And Trump is so incompetent and corrupt, that he keeps appointing similar incompetents and corrupt individuals like DeVoss, Flynn, Carson, and Pruitt. If you care to enlighten me on one of Trump's great ideas, I'd love to hear what idea of his you think is a great policy idea.
 

With due respect, repeated posts consisting of "No." do not contribute to anything approaching conversation.

If you find logger's claims too silly to rebut, then please just ignore him. Thanks.
 
With due respect, repeated posts consisting of "No." do not contribute to anything approaching conversation.

If you find logger's claims too silly to rebut, then please just ignore him. Thanks.

"No." is a complete sentence. I also don't find anything logger says to have anything approaching conversation.
 
I think it started sooner than that when Trump picked the guy on an impulse.

It really had to come down to He's a Doctor, he's in the military, I like him so let him oversee one of the biggest most complex agencies we have.

I genuinely feel bad for Admiral Jackson. He should NEVER have been put in this position. The only thing that might make this worse is if he is actually confirmed.
 
GEEZ, I can't think of a single good idea Trump has. Not a one. And Trump is so incompetent and corrupt, that he keeps appointing similar incompetents and corrupt individuals like DeVoss, Flynn, Carson, and Pruitt. If you care to enlighten me on one of Trump's great ideas, I'd love to hear what idea of his you think is a great policy idea.

Well that will take a time machine to judge:
1. For individual tax payers are the tax changes in the main cuts.
2. Does the economy continue to grow
3. Do the changes in enviromental protection laws cause measurable damage and does the USA fall behind other nations in "green technology".
There are of course connections between these but generally if it is Yes, Yes, 2xNo then that is what his supporters will show you.

To add to the above there is also 4. health care which is an unknown and then the balancing of the budget which is related to these 4 (I assume infrastructure bill is nothing to important)
 
Well that will take a time machine to judge:
1. For individual tax payers are the tax changes in the main cuts.
2. Does the economy continue to grow
3. Do the changes in enviromental protection laws cause measurable damage and does the USA fall behind other nations in "green technology".
There are of course connections between these but generally if it is Yes, Yes, 2xNo then that is what his supporters will show you.

To add to the above there is also 4. health care which is an unknown and then the balancing of the budget which is related to these 4 (I assume infrastructure bill is nothing to important)

1. Tax cuts for the wealthy are hardly a Trump idea. They seem to be a staple of Republicans for quite some time. Was the bill written by the Trump administration? No, it was written by the Republican Congress. Trump barely knew what was in it.
2. Does the economy continue to grow? This is an effect, not a policy idea.
3. One could say the destruction of environmental protections is a Trump policy idea.
4. Trump seemed more interested in destroying ANYTHING that Obama may have accomplished more than any genuine ideas of his own. He seemed more interested in destroying Obamacare than actually improving healthcare.

Infrastructure was my only hope that Trump might succeed in something that I could get behind. But it seems as if he not only has no good ideas to address the problem, he lacks real motivation and commitment.
 
As I've said before, it's amazing how dyed in the wool Republicans keep becoming RINOs when they displease Trump.
 
Now Trump May have known nothing about McGahn giving them to Rosenstein, I’m sure you’ll continue to believe that.

Well, you got me there, logger. No doubt the President of the United States with projects and activities around the world and CEO of the Trump Organization with projects and activities around the world keeps track of every freakin' pair of cuff links he doles out. Do you have a pair?

.....

Of cuff links, I mean.
 
No that shows the previous president was a bumbling incompetent.

The conversation this post is a part of is about Trump possibly changing the political orientation of the Ninth Circuit. Now, how in the hell do you go from that to the above post?

Are you ok, logger? Have a fever? Night sweats? Does Jack Daniels whisper sweet nothings in your ear when you get home after work? Enquiring minds want to know.
 
Besides it was a bold and brilliant move by McConnell to block him.

I agree, it was. To the detriment of the USA. McConnell has, through this action and many others, shown that he doesn't give a **** about the country. His only concern is his Senate seat and the dominance of his party. IMO, when history is written, McConnell will be found to have done more damage to democracy and the USA than even Trump - which is saying a lot.
 
Thing is, if Obama had tried to go around the Republican party, he'd been a tyrant. Yet Trump is encouraged too. Weee
 
With due respect, repeated posts consisting of "No." do not contribute to anything approaching conversation.

If you find logger's claims too silly to rebut, then please just ignore him. Thanks.

Thanks. I was about to post something similar. Posts without content have no value.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom