• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories VI: Lyndon Johnson's Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
How do you know it is McLain in the Dorman film?

Three facts support the belief that the motorcycle officer in the Dorman film is H.B. McLain.
First, the motorcycle officer in the Dorman film is seen riding on the left side of motorcade
between Camera Car 3 and Congressional Car 1 – the same relative position occupied by
McLain throughout the entire motorcade140 and the precise position occupied by McLain
twelve seconds earlier, as depicted in the Hughes film. [Exhibit 60]
Second, the motorcycle officer in the Dorman film has a white object attached to the inside
lower-left corner of his windshield. A similar white object is visible on McLain’s motorcycle
twelve seconds earlier, as depicted in the Hughes film. [Exhibit 61]
McLain testified that the white object was his paper work which he kept fastened to the
inside of the motorcycle’s windshield with two clip holders. This was one of several identifying
characteristics which allowed McLain to identify his motorcycle from others used by the police department.141 High quality photographs taken before and after the assassination
show this unique feature of McLain’s motorcycle. [Exhibit 62]
Third, the trajectory and speed of the motorcycle officer in the Dorman film is consistent
with the projected trajectory and speed of McLain’s motorcycle, as depicted in the Hughes
film.
 
The red arrow points to the MC, the white arrow, to McLains white helmet.

McLain is the only MC-police who could possibly be there at this time. Process of elimination.

LOL. What do you think of the comprehensive debunking that the National Academy of Science did to the dictabelt recording?

Be thorough and specific.
 
How do you know?

1. Is not an MC-police?

2. Is it an MC-police, but not McLain?

I have no idea what those arrows are supposed to be pointing at.

There is no evidence that they are pointing at a) a DPD motorcycle officer or b) HB McLain specifically. Personally, I don't see anything.

The footage in the Dorman film is much clearer, and most certainly shows HB McLain in a position nowhere near where he needed to be after the shooting.
 
I have no idea what those arrows are supposed to be pointing at.

There is no evidence that they are pointing at a) a DPD motorcycle officer or b) HB McLain specifically. Personally, I don't see anything.

The footage in the Dorman film is much clearer, and most certainly shows HB McLain in a position nowhere near where he needed to be after the shooting.
So, what could the white arrow point at, if not a MC-helmet? It’s too high up to be a head/hat on a person sitting in the cars.

So, what is it?
 
So, what could the white arrow point at, if not a MC-helmet? It’s too high up to be a head/hat on a person sitting in the cars.

So, what is it?

I don't see anything where the white arrow is pointing. Certainly nothing definitive that says it's a DPD motorcycle cop, and specifically HB McLain.

Just to be clear, you're dismissing the 192-page report with dozens of screenshots and a running clock, plus the accompanying video from Dale Myers...in favor of that?

Swing and a miss.
 
So, what could the white arrow point at, if not a MC-helmet? It’s too high up to be a head/hat on a person sitting in the cars.

So, what is it?

Your claim, your burden of proof.

What do you think of the comprehensive debunking that the National Academy of Science did to the dictabelt recording?

Why do CTs run away from questions? You're a CT, manifesto so maybe you can answer. Why do you CTs run away?
 
Your claim, your burden of proof.
IF it is a MC-police, it’s exactly where it has to be in order to pick up the sound of the first shot.

IF it is a MC-police, it HAVE to be McLain. No one else is close enough in the existing photographic record.

IF it’s NOT a MC- police, what is it? To high for car and no trucks was in that part of the motorcade in that area at the time of the filmed sequence.

So, what is it?

What do you think of the comprehensive debunking that the National Academy of Science did to the dictabelt recording?
Junk science.

Why do CTs run away from questions?
Do they, now? Show me.

You're a CT, manifesto
Am I, RoboTimbo? Exiting. Define a CT.

so maybe you can answer. Why do you CTs run away?
Do they?

Show me.
 
That necessary democratic function are defunct in USA ever since the assassination of president Kennedy. Hofstadters little essay have a part in this.

Your preaching about American democracy, good citizenship, and the alleged post-JFK disappearance of these ideals is ridiculous. To mention just one thing, ten years after JFK's assassination a President was forced out of the White House as a result of citizenship in action, reflected in the efforts of the investigative press, congressional sanity, and strong public opinion.
 
I don't see anything where the white arrow is pointing. Certainly nothing definitive that says it's a DPD motorcycle cop, and specifically HB McLain.
Don’t you? Are you sure? Do you have any problems with your eye sight?

Just to be clear, you're dismissing the 192-page report with dozens of screenshots and a running clock, plus the accompanying video from Dale Myers...in favor of that?

Swing and a miss.
What in said report are you finding convincing? I can’t know this for you. Only YOU know what YOU know.

Tell me what you know and why this is evidence of McLain NOT being at the right spots at the right time for being the cop with the stuck mike.

As I have done with the acoustic evidence. A detailed presentation of method, facts, data and conclusion.

You have to do the same with Myers. How else could I know what makes you convinced?

Mind reading?
 
IF it is a MC-police, it’s exactly where it has to be in order to pick up the sound of the first shot.

IF it is a MC-police, it HAVE to be McLain. No one else is close enough in the existing photographic record.

IF it’s NOT a MC- police, what is it? To high for car and no trucks was in that part of the motorcade in that area at the time of the filmed sequence.

So, what is it?
Your claim, your burden of proof.

Junk science.
How so? Be specific. Your claim, your burden of proof. Otherwise, the null hypothesis still holds.

Do they, now? Show me.
Look at any of your posts where you've run away from answering questions.

Am I, RoboTimbo? Exiting. Define a CT.
What did you think of the definitions you've already been spoon-fed?

Do they?

Show me.
Here you go: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=12267876#post12267876

Now answer the questions you've been asked without running away. Can a CT do that?
 
Your preaching about American democracy, good citizenship, and the alleged post-JFK disappearance of these ideals is ridiculous. To mention just one thing, ten years after JFK's assassination a President was forced out of the White House as a result of citizenship in action, reflected in the efforts of the investigative press, congressional sanity, and strong public opinion.
It was the CIA & co who forced him out. Not an informed public.

Do your homework. Bread and circuses.
 
It is every citicens duty to carefully observe the doings of members of their public servants and other powerful people and groupings.

Tell me, what part of good citizenship is it to ignore the overwhelming evidence that points to the guilt of that wretched homicidal waif Oswald, in the interests of hunting anomalies and indulging suspicions? JFK's life was ended by an unhappy little man who hadn't anything better to do that day than play out some ideological fantasy and try to thrust himself into the history books. Have you looked into your conscience and asked yourself why you deny all or most of the evidence against Oswald, which you clearly do? Do you think you've made JFK's ghost happy with your exercise of "citizenship"?
 
As I have done with the acoustic evidence. A detailed presentation of method, facts, data and conclusion.
Remember, we agreed that a CT who continued to hang their hat on the dictabelt recording foolishness would be lying to continue to present it as factual and correct since the National Academy of Science had thoroughly debunked it.
 
It was the CIA & co who forced him out. Not an informed public.

You haven't any idea what you're talking about. You're embarrassing yourself. I've advised you to go to the type of list that enjoys and promotes your paranoid style--you know, those lists where you say you've had more "success." I advise you to do so again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom