Ed Breaking: Mueller Grand Jury charges filed, arrests as soon as Monday

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

No, once again you’re leading yourself into something that isnt reality.

What I said is what the story you linked to said. If you think it "isnt reality", then perhaps you ought to take it up with the Convervative Treehouse?

 

[logger]

Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of the word "target" yet, after all. Oh well, nothing I can do about that.

Perhaps you don’t. You’ve been known to embellish your way through.

 

[logger]

What I said is what the story you linked to said. If you think it "isnt reality", then perhaps you ought to take it up with the Convervative Treehouse?

What probably happen is Rosenstein ended the targeting of Trump so he could keep his job.

Again, your reality!

 

[Foolmewunz]

No, once again you’re leading yourself into something that isnt reality. It doesn’t change the fact he isn’t the target.

Haw haw haw! Neither was Paulie Ukraine.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Perhaps you don’t. You’ve been known to embellish your way through.

What probably happen is Rosenstein ended the targeting of Trump so he could keep his job.

Again, your reality!

Yeah, this second post of yours makes it clear that you don't know what the definition of "target" is. 10 seconds on google should be enough to educate yourself. My prediction is that you will choose not to.

 

[logger]

Yeah, this second post of yours makes it clear that you don't know what the definition of "target" is. 10 seconds on google should be enough to educate yourself. My prediction is that you will choose not to.

Lol, I knew you’d be back on this. He’s not a target, it’s clear wording and it shows you have nothing by somehow trying to make this word into something your reality is manufacturing.

Joe DiGenova had a good point though. He said Rosenstein should be fired for taking this long to tell the president this information.

 

[Upchurch]

Because why would there be any potential conflict in one of the witnesses in this investigation also being one of Trump's lawyers?

A ploy to keep Giuliani from testifying due to lawyer-client privilege, maybe? Probably not, but it seems like they’ve tried weaker rationalizations.

 

[logger]

A ploy to keep Giuliani from testifying due to lawyer-client privilege, maybe? Probably not, but it seems like they’ve tried weaker rationalizations.

A lawyer can be compelled to testify as a witness.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Lol, I knew you’d be back on this. He’s not a target, it’s clear wording and it shows you have nothing by somehow trying to make this word into something your reality is manufacturing.

The words "target" and "subject" have specific legal definitions. There's DoJ guidelines about them, and everything. As you'd know, if you took the 10 seconds it would take to google it. But you choose not to, because you'd rather remain ignorant. That's on you.

 

[Stacko]

No, he told him he's not a target. That doesn't mean he's not a subject of the investigation. Do you understand what those terms mean and what the difference is?

And just because he's not a target at this particular time doesn't mean he's not going to be in the future.

In short:

Rosenstein tells Trump these are not the droids he’s looking for. Trump tells Rosenstein to move along, move along.

And, if you have to wonder why Rosenstein would say something like this to Trump, well, as the article you linked to quoted...



So, that explains why Rosenstein would say such a thing.

This is also Trump confessing that he plans to obstruct justice, again.

 

[logger]

The words "target" and "subject" have specific legal definitions. There's DoJ guidelines about them, and everything. As you'd know, if you took the 10 seconds it would take to google it. But you choose not to, because you'd rather remain ignorant. That's on you.

In short:

Rosenstein tells Trump these are not the droids he’s looking for. Trump tells Rosenstein to move along, move along.



This is also Trump confessing that he plans to obstruct justice, again.

More wishful thinking, I suppose you’re seeing it’s all beginning to fall apart.

 

[abaddon]

More wishful thinking, I suppose you’re seeing it’s all beginning to fall apart.

Agree. The trump presidency is falling apart.

 

[Octavo]

More wishful thinking, I suppose you’re seeing it’s all beginning to fall apart.

I'm not sure why you're having a hard time buying that (((Rosenstein))) is being a two-faced shyster by telling Trump he isn't a target, when he's playing legal word games. Just because Trump isn't a target, doesn't mean he isn't a subject. And subjects become targets very easily.

I'm surprised you haven't clued to that angle yet.

 

[Amazer]

I'm not sure why you're having a hard time buying that (((Rosenstein))) is being a two-faced shyster by telling Trump he isn't a target, when he's playing legal word games. Just because Trump isn't a target, doesn't mean he isn't a subject. And subjects become targets very easily.

I'm surprised you haven't clued to that angle yet.

What's with the brackets around Rosensteins name?

Sent from my SM-J700F using Tapatalk

 

[The Don]

What's with the brackets around Rosensteins name?

Sent from my SM-J700F using Tapatalk

It's used by right wing extremists to designate someone Jewish. I assume Oktavo was using it ironically and/or to suggest that the person (s)he was responding to might consider using them.

 

[Crossbow]

More wishful thinking, I suppose you’re seeing it’s all beginning to fall apart.

Wanna bet?

 

[Cabbage]

Lol, I knew you’d be back on this. He’s not a target, it’s clear wording and it shows you have nothing by somehow trying to make this word into something your reality is manufacturing.

Joe DiGenova had a good point though. He said Rosenstein should be fired for taking this long to tell the president this information.

Furthermore, it's well known that all police agencies are required by law to inform targets of investigation that they are, in fact, targets of investigation.

I mean, after all, if that wasn't the case we would have police giving extended surveillance on criminal targets, just waiting for a crime to be committed that could then be used against them in a court of law.

That would be unConstitutional Entrapment.

 

[varwoche]

Whistling passed the graveyard.

Whistling past the graveyard. Although, once one has whistled past the graveyard, one will have passed the graveyard while whistling.

Carry on.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Furthermore, it's well known that all police agencies are required by law to inform targets of investigation that they are, in fact, targets of investigation.

I mean, after all, if that wasn't the case we would have police giving extended surveillance on criminal targets, just waiting for a crime to be committed that could then be used against them in a court of law.

That would be unConstitutional Entrapment.

Could you provide a cite for this requirement "by law"? It does not ring true.

 

[Dragon]

Could you provide a cite for this requirement "by law"? It does not ring true.

I think your sarcasm detector needs recalibrating...