I used to think that was the case too, then I went to Dallas and stood in front of the fence. Suddenly those "grainy pictures" reveal a lot more detail
Show me. After that, Tell me why the majority of interviewed witnesses report shots from the knoll, if they clearly saw that nobody was there shooting.
You love calling people names, don’t you. Why is that? Low self-esteem? You are trying to compensate?
It's also a lousy place to make a shot from...you know, if you're a professional.
Not if it were a triangulation. Somebody had painted yellow marks on the south curb on Elm Street that day. Nobody knows why or to what purpose. The Umbrella man starts pumping his umbrella up and down during the shooting. Greer is slowing down the limo after the first shot and continue doing that until he sees JFK’s head taking a fatal blow, then he speeds away. Say that there were no fatal hit when it happened. A couple of seconds more and the limo would have completely stopped.
Sitting duck.
Zapruder AND HIS ASSISATANT were the two closest people to the fence. There's no way neither of them could not have heard a rifle being fired, and no way neither wouldn't have looked to their right to see the shooter.
For a theory to be believable is has to be grounded in reality.
They were focused on the president and saw nothing else, but they heard shots coming from ”behind” them. The area discussed are behind/to the right of them.
Oh good, we're back to ear-testimony again.
I did respond to this blatant lie:
INO WITNESSES CLOSE TO THE TSBD POINTED TO THE GRASSY KNOLL AS THE SOURCE OF THE GUNSHOTS!
Should I not point out lies when I see them?
The echo problem has been addressed multiple times already.
Has it? What is the consensus? Everybody that heard shot from anywhere than TSBD actually heard echoes?
What did the other 300+ people see and hear?
I was specifically adressing the blatant lie that nobody in the vicinity of TSBD reported shots from the area around the knoll.
There were ca 600 people on Dealey Plaza when JFK was killed. Ca 200 was interviewed by authorities. Ca half of them got asked on the positions of shooters and lots of identified witnesses standing closest to the event were ignored. There are also cases of manipulation of witnesses and accusations of falsifying reports.
Still, the majority pointed (and run up to) to the knoll as the source of the shots = conspiracy.
Sure it is. First, it assumes the witness is truthful. Second, it assumes the witness is clear headed.
No it doesn’t. Every witness and testimony has to be evaluated on its own merits.
There are a lot of innocent people doing hard time and or are sitting on death row thanks to faulty, inaccurate sworn testimony.
Absolutely a big problem, but that doesn’t lend itself to wholesale denunciation of ALL witness testimony as worthless. It says that you have to be careful when evaluating what is said, by whom and when it is said.
What, do you mean like the small problem of the 6.5x52mm round made for the Carcano? You've never wondered why it says "Carcano" on the box of cartridges? Why doesn't it say "Carcano and Mauser"?
Your lack of firearms knowledge is what is hanging you here.
You missunderstood. I wonder WHAT STUDIES you are refering to.
Gosh, you know, when a couple of pathologists cut open a dead body to determine the cause of death.
Ah, you are refering to the autopsy performed by Humes, Bosswell and Finck at Bethesda the night of the assassination. Good.
In this case they found an entry wound in the upper thorax
No, they found an entry wound in the back between the spine and the shoulder blade. Ca 4 cm deep.
that exited through the throat,
No, they did not track the bullet through the body. They
asumed it exited from the throat where the Parkland doctors described a ”small, round, punctuated entrance wound” before they performed a tracheotomy in it.
and they found a SINGLE entrance wound in the back of the skull which exited out the side front.
Correct. The entrance wound was positioned on the External Occipital Protuberance ca 4 cm from the midline and at the lowest part of the (right) back of the head. They also observed a trail of very small fragments in the x-rays of the lower part of the right brain. They also found a big gaping wound in the right back of the head.
Ca 15 years later the HSCA’s medical panel saw something completely different:
- Entry wound at the top of the back of the head, in the cowlick area in the midline ca 11 cm above where the autopsy had located it. That is a lot of realestate!
- The trail of small bullet-fragments were now observed in the top of the right brain, not the lower part.
- There where NO big gaping wound i the right back of the head. Not a scratch.
- A big round thin bullet fragment with the exact diameter as a Carcano-bullet was now found in the x-rays. Ca a centimeter beneath the NEW entrance wound and on the outside of the cranium. Something missed by the x-ray-team at Bethesda the night of the assassination?? The single biggest peace of metal inte JFK’s body. Missed by the x-ray-doctors?
- The newly found bullet fragment had to have been very neatly slized of the middle of the bullet that first had to have been split in two before entering the cranium leasing the slized of fragment on the outside of the cranium, travel through the head and landing, both of the pieces, close together on the floor beneath the front seats. Some feat.
So, who do you believe?
Almost 50 surgeons, doctors, nurses, forensic pathologists, forensic photographers, x-ray-technicians, from three hospitals, Secret Service agents and FBI agents vs. a few x-rays and a few autopsy-photographs?
It’s your call.
Fragments recovered from the brain matched the fragments recovered from the car.
How did they match and where is the secured chain of custody?
Coincidence? Had JFK been shot without his knowledge in WWII by a lone Italian marksman on a Japanese destroyer? And the bullet chose to continue its flight in the hot Dallas sun?
What?
The fiber evidence from JFK's jacket, shirt, and necktie all show a single missile entering from behind and exiting the front.
No, it doesn’t. It shows a bullet hole in the back and a scissors cut in the tie/shirt.
What they heard was dependent on where they stood. The acoustics of Dealey Plaza have been scientifically mapped a few times
Yes, and HSCA performed blind tests with subjects guessing where from a rifle shot originated. Everyone got it right everytime.
Do you have other tests with different results?
When you're a conspiracy theorists
You really love to call people names, don’t you. Feels good inside of you, doesn’t it?
all facts not in line with your theory are lies,
Wrong. Facts are facts until proven otherwise. It’s really that simple.
and all lies supporting your argument are "Science", so it becomes hard to tell what's real
Name ONE lie.
Ah, here you are again, calling people names. You really like doing that, don’t you. Makes you feel a little better, doesn’t it?
Bad excuse for good arguments, though.
