The Trump Presidency (Act V - The One Where Everybody Dies)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Funny that not 48 hours after he chided Republican senators about being afraid of the NRA, The Hair is back to being their bitch.

Another example of his "last in, next out" mentality. It really is just down to the last person he listened to.
 
Funny that not 48 hours after he chided Republican senators about being afraid of the NRA, The Hair is back to being their bitch.

Yep. Guns? Was someone talking about guns? Say, I think I'll put some tariffs on steel and aluminum. And how fat is that Rosie, huh?
 
Just a coincidence I assume.

Although strangely enough, Trump hasn't bragged about how great the DOW is doing lately. Someone should remind him to tweet about that more often.

Actually I think its brilliant... add tariffs on steel and aluminium, ignite a trade war, crater the economy. Then, claim they need to cut taxes on corporations and the rich even more in order to stimulate the economy out of the mess caused by the trade war. Trump becomes the savior.

And Trump's voter base is probably dumb enough to believe it.
 
Putin brags about powerful new nukes that he calls invulnerable.

Trump tweets about 'Alex' Baldwin’s SNL impersonation.
 
Maryland is in the process of passing a new law that would remove President Donald Trump, or any candidate for that matter, from the ballot who refuses to publicly release their federal income tax returns.

http://news.groopspeak.com/presiden...he-election-ballot-in-maryland-under-new-law/

If it is something voters want to know, there is no need for the law. Those who won't vote for a candidate who doesn't can do so, and those who don't think it matters can. Why does it need a law?
 
Is there any evidence they are related to the tariffs?

You keep asking me questions like this. Why don't you read the articles and see what they say? Then you'll have just as much information on the subject as I do and you won't need to ask any questions of me. I put links rather than just making statements so that people can read the articles. Why not avail yourself of that opportunity?
 
Is there any evidence they are related to the tariffs?

No, there is no evidence that two are related at all, that would satisfy the requirements of a court. This is merely an activity in "what ifs", which is perfectly healthy in any form of debate between skeptical people. The evidence contained in the link is all there is at this moment.

Thanks, moving on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom