• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Delvo said:
Anybody still want to pretend she's done hurting the party and the cause with her Trump-scale narcissism yet?
Click to expand...

I guess you ignored this part....

"If she's willing to go into those districts she won, she would be extraordinarily helpful," former Democratic Representative Steve Israel of New York told The Hill in December. "Trump's numbers have only fallen in those districts, so you start there. It would be such a loss if she sat it out and a double loss if she didn't go into those districts."
Click to expand...
 
WilliamSeger said:
I had to laugh at the phrase "her Trump-scale narcissism." I wonder if future psychiatrists will use the Trump Scale to measure the severity of the disorder.
Click to expand...


A Trump Scale, with Trump at the high end, would have to be a logarithmic one. like the moment magnitude scale they use for earthquakes.

Otherwise, the next closest on the scale would be measured in fractions approaching zero.
 
The hallmark of a successful politician is not that they lack narcissism, but that they have learned a modicum of discretion.

But whatever. Does this latest news mean that Hillary is done? Or that she's not done? Is she done if she only goes to districts she won last time, and that are probably safe anyway?
 
theprestige said:
The hallmark of a successful politician is not that they lack narcissism, but that they have learned a modicum of discretion.

But whatever. Does this latest news mean that Hillary is done? Or that she's not done? Is she done if she only goes to districts she won last time, and that are probably safe anyway?
Click to expand...

Well considering that the article notes that she's going to be working behind the scenes to help and support candidates, that she's not taking an "up front" role, it seems that this would indicate that as far as her own political career, yes, as far as being involved in politics, which has pretty much been her life since she was 16, then no. That makes sense, she's a former 1st lady and in some parts of the country well liked. Her support in those areas would be a great boost to the candidates there just as Laura Bush or Michelle Obama are likely to have some influence in certain areas of the country.
 
PhantomWolf said:
Well considering that the article notes that she's going to be working behind the scenes to help and support candidates, that she's not taking an "up front" role, it seems that this would indicate that as far as her own political career, yes, as far as being involved in politics, which has pretty much been her life since she was 16, then no. That makes sense, she's a former 1st lady and in some parts of the country well liked. Her support in those areas would be a great boost to the candidates there just as Laura Bush or Michelle Obama are likely to have some influence in certain areas of the country.
Click to expand...

More importantly, she knows the people who write big checks on a first name basis.
 
The Big Dog said:
like Harvey, Anthony and Burns....
Click to expand...

Whom are not likely to be on anyone's donor list anytime soon.

But hey, never miss an opportunity to smear Clinton with someone else's crimes, eh? It's what you do when you don't have real dirt.
 
Mycroft said:
Whom are not likely to be on anyone's donor list anytime soon.
Click to expand...
People like that aren't likely to be on anyone's donor list?

Are you sure about that? Because I think if there's one thing we've learned recently, it's that donor lists -- which are essentially lists of the rich and powerful -- are *full* of people like that. Do you think Harvey Weinstein is the only rich, venal, entitled donor Hillary knows personally?

I mean, I dunno, but I suspect she may be acquainted with a certain William Jefferson Clinton, if nothing else.
 
Mycroft said:
Whom are not likely to be on anyone's donor list anytime soon.

But hey, never miss an opportunity to smear Clinton with someone else's crimes, eh? It's what you do when you don't have real dirt.
Click to expand...

Oh dear, when they were writing big *********** checks, they were the Bee's Knees.

But after their disgrace? How dare you point out that Harvey Weinstein was writing those huge checks for years, that Anthony Weiner had Hillary's emails on the same laptop he solicited he minor girls on, and Burns Strider was so worthwhile that Hillary overruled the people who wanted his disgusting ass fired.

Say, those seem like Hillary's problems.

Just think how happy we all will be when that scumbag is really done, huh?
 
theprestige said:
People like that aren't likely to be on anyone's donor list?

Are you sure about that? Because I think if there's one thing we've learned recently, it's that donor lists -- which are essentially lists of the rich and powerful -- are *full* of people like that. Do you think Harvey Weinstein is the only rich, venal, entitled donor Hillary knows personally?

<snip>
Click to expand...


Probably not. I expect she knows a lot of Republicans.
 
The Big Dog said:
Oh dear, when they were writing big *********** checks, they were the Bee's Knees.

But after their disgrace? How dare you point out that Harvey Weinstein was writing those huge checks for years, that Anthony Weiner had Hillary's emails on the same laptop he solicited he minor girls on, and Burns Strider was so worthwhile that Hillary overruled the people who wanted his disgusting ass fired.

Say, those seem like Hillary's problems.

Just think how happy we all will be when that scumbag is really done, huh?
Click to expand...

Harvey Weinstein was an isolated case. None of the *other* rich and powerful elites in Hillary's rolodex would *ever* be involved in such things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom