• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Michael Flynn charged

WilliamSeger said:
That Flynn only got charged with lying to the FBI because Mueller couldn't pin anything else on him, so QED no collusion. That's a really stupid argument.
Click to expand...

Lol

No that wasn’t it at all. Because Flynn was charged with lying, that makes him a terrible witness. That is what Dershowitz’s point was.
 
logger said:
Lol

No that wasn’t it at all. Because Flynn was charged with lying, that makes him a terrible witness. That is what Dershowitz’s point was.
Click to expand...

No, that was just a lame attempt to buttress his main point:

I’m sure the prosecutor was trying to indict him for some scheme or conspiracy that involved other people in the White House, but there is nothing there, and he had to, finally come down and indict him for lying, which makes him a useless witness. So, this is not a show of strength by the prosecutor. It’s a show of weakness. It’s a show that they really have nothing on anybody above of Flynn and that Flynn made the terrible mistake about lying about something he could have told truth about.
Click to expand...
 
NoahFence said:
If it's on britebart, it's worthless.

But it was you who said they were just relaying the news. I simply corrected you.
Click to expand...

Corrected me about what? You said just as you did in this quoted post that Breitbart is worthless, I simply informed you they’re just reporting the news, the news being an opinion piece by Dershowitz.

As usual.

They were printing someone's opinion.[/QUOTE]
No ****!
 
logger said:
Corrected me about what? You said just as you did in this quoted post that Breitbart is worthless, I simply informed you they’re just reporting the news, the news being an opinion piece by Dershowitz.

As usual.

They were printing someone's opinion.
Click to expand...
No ****![/QUOTE]

Again you think that opinion and news are the same.

They're NOT.

Again and again you have been corrected. Any more and i start charging for your education.
 
NoahFence said:
No ****!

Again you think that opinion and news are the same.

They're NOT.

Again and again you have been corrected. Any more and i start charging for your education.
Click to expand...

Lol

Dershowitz’s opinion on this issue is actually news. ;)
 
logger said:
Lol

Dershowitz’s opinion on this issue is actually news. ;)
Click to expand...

Your posting style reminds me of Breitbart's managing editor. He tends to let out a little involuntary snicker of derision before responding to (or dodging, deflecting or obfuscating) a question.
 
NoahFence said:
It's an opinion piece.

That is not news. You DO know there's a difference, don't you?
Click to expand...

Saw Dershowitz on CNN today as a pundit. He's going around giving his biased opinion claiming it is based on his legal expertise. It's not. He was called out by another pundit as being totally biased toward the request for the delayed resolution against Israel.

It's like Trump not caring if Russia interfered in the election, Trump won. Dershowitz was all for the Russian intervening, because he wanted the outcome about the resolution against Israel deferred.

Cheating is OK as long as you benefit.:rolleyes:

The Hill: OPINION | Dershowitz is wrong about Mueller and Russia
"Attorney Alan Dershowitz says special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia 'endangers Democracy.'”

"The idea of trying to create crimes just because we disagree with [Trump] politically, and target him, really endangers democracy. [It] reminds me of what the head of the KGB said to Stalin: 'Show me the man, and I will find you the crime,'" Dershowitz told John Catsimatidis on New York's AM 970 in an interview that aired on Sunday.
Click to expand...
 
logger said:
It wasn’t posted as proof, it was posted as more news. It’s my opinion it is a nothing burger. ;)
Click to expand...

Why has this "nothingburger" compelled so many Trump associates to lie to the
FBI and congress?

No need to lie about nothing. OTC, there is a need to not lie to the FBI. Especially about nothing.

Just doing your job won't get you 5 years, but lying to the FBI might get you 5 years.
 
Toontown said:
Why has this "nothingburger" compelled so many Trump associates to lie to the
FBI and congress?

No need to lie about nothing. OTC, there is a need to not lie to the FBI. Especially about nothing.

Just doing your job won't get you 5 years, but lying to the FBI might get you 5 years.
Click to expand...

You might want to familiarize yourself with what Papa and Flynn lied about? Then simply ask yourself, does this prove collusion? ;)
 
logger said:
You might want to familiarize yourself with what Papa and Flynn lied about? Then simply ask yourself, does this prove collusion? ;)
Click to expand...

It seems they were lying to cover up or minimize contacts they had had with Russians.

This at a time when their boss was asserting that “the Russia thing” was “a ruse”, and that no one on his team had made such contacts.

Theory 1: They lied on their own out of a sense of loyalty.

Theory 2: The had instructions or pressure to lie in order to validate Trump’s assertions.

I assume the investigators are in search of evidence to support or refute either of these theories.

If the evidence confirms Theory 2, the question will be a paraphrase of Watergate’s: “What did the President order, and when did he order it?”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom