Flat Earth Internation Conference 2017!!!

[MikeG]

Wait, wait, wait. That's can't honestly be your whole strategy, right?....

Well then, I stand corrected.

What's even funnier is the number of times he's said this to actual scientists.

 

[threadworm]

Wait, wait, wait. That's can't honestly be your whole strategy, right? I mean, you can't seriously just respond to everyone with "you wouldn't know what ACTUAL "Science" was if it landed on your head, spun around, and whistled dixie" right? That would be crazy - a child's idea of a rebuttal. I'm sure you're just making a joke about that being your tactic and would never actually rely on such a weak attempt at discourse.



Oh.

Well then, I stand corrected.

I know, if only he'd said.

 

[SOdhner]

What's even funnier is the number of times he's said this to actual scientists.

But did those scientists have SCIENCE sitting on their heads and whistling Dixie? More importantly, did they know it?

As with so many of these theories, it comes down to the theorist thinking that they know science better than everyone else including actual experts. If nothing else they have great self esteem.

 

[Daniel]

Lake Pontchartrain utility towers show the curvature:

https://www.metabunk.org/soundly-proving-the-curvature-of-the-earth-at-lake-pontchartrain.t8939/

I've PUMMELED Soundly's Nonsense into the Incoherent Oblivion, personally...

The total distance of these power lines over Lake Pontchartrain is 15.9 Miles.
Per Soundly: Viewer Height was between 35 - 50 Feet, so let's say 40 Feet.
The distance between each Pylon is .18 Miles. (~88 Pylons)
I counted ~ 40 Pylons in Soundly's now infamous "P-900" shot...roughly 7 Miles, with some significant curvature.
Louisiana Length (North/South = 379 Miles)

If Soundly's Pics/Video are Accurate; THEN, we MUST LIVE ON...

"PLANET LOUISIANA" !! smh

Furthermore, according to your 'Spinning-Ball' Narrative, every point along a Tangent from your feet falls away from you in every direction at 8" per mile².

The horizon at 7 Miles from 90 degrees --- through Zero --- to 270 degrees is 21.5 MILES.

So you're saying that we see significant curvature on the Z Axis....which is at 7 Miles BUT along the X Axis...which is 21.5 MILES: It's FLAT, No Curvature ???


So to remain "COHERENT" with Soundly's Z Axis, the X Axis should look like this...

http://imgur.com/iWg9vSZ

Do you need more Gasoline with your Matches?


regards

 

[Daniel]

As opposed to anti-science ignorami parroting stupid youtube memes.

Have some pictures of Earth taken decades before any computer would be capable of producing anything like it.

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/iK7tS8q.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/12OZ6Ap.jpg[/qimg]

Please Provide the Original Source Files...?


regards

 

[Daniel]

The curve doesn't go away just because you don't see it from a different angle.

Say What?

Does the back of a house go away when you look at the front?

Nope.


regards

 

[Daniel]

How can you say that evolution is a fairytale when you don't even know what it is?

I was referring to "Nobody" knows what it is. I'll show ya...

'evolution'?? What's that...? Define evolution...?

a. Post the Scientific Theory of evolution...?
b. Post just TWO Formal Scientific Hypotheses then Experiments that concretized it into a REAL Scientific Theory...?
c. Post the Null Hypotheses that were Rejected/Falsified for each...?
d. Highlight The Independent Variables used in Each TEST...?

regards

 

[rwguinn]

Amazing how nobody has ever been able to see both Singapore and Chicago simultaneously from way up yonder in the sky, or even from the top of Mount Everest or Kilimanjaro

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[threadworm]

Please Provide the Original Source Files...?


regards

Why?

Are you under the impression that they are somehow made up? Is it news to you that there are literally thousands of images of Earth pre-dating digital imagery and CGI? If it is then you need to step out of this conversation.

Here, have a link to my personal copy of a 1968 publication containing the first image.

http://onebigmonkey.com/apollo/ephemera/americaninspace.pdf

The other one - well, how about you try and do a reverse search and see if you can work out what it is.

I've got a shelf full of publications from the 1960s and 1970s all with lots of lovely photos of Earth in them taken by Apollo, Surveyor, ATS satellites, the original Lunar Orbiter series, all way before any CGI was possible.

 

[Daniel]

They didn't have CGI in 1947.

"First Photo From Space", eh? Well you have a couple problems...

1. There is No "Space" (i.e. No "Vacuum of Space").
2. Rotate this "Photo" 90 degrees Clockwise, what do you see...?


regards

 

[Daniel]

Why?

So I can run them through Photo Forensics and Validate their Authenticity, Objectively.

Are you under the impression that they are somehow made up?

Yes, since every appeal ("Photo") of the Earth that I've run though Forensics has been Manipulated.

Is it news to you that there are literally thousands of images of Earth pre-dating digital imagery and CGI?

Post some...?

If it is then you need to step out of this conversation.

I don't think so.

Here, have a link to my personal copy of a 1968 publication containing the first image.

http://onebigmonkey.com/apollo/ephemera/americaninspace.pdf

Source File Please...?

I've got a shelf full of publications from the 1960s and 1970s all with lots of lovely photos of Earth in them taken by Apollo, Surveyor, ATS satellites, the original Lunar Orbiter series, all way before any CGI was possible.

Sure. When was CGI first Possible...?


regards

 

[threadworm]

I'll be kind, have a scan of my own dated cover to help you work out the other image I poste:

 

[threadworm]

So I can run them through Photo Forensics and Validate their Authenticity, Objectively.

You think you can do that with a paper copy?

Yes, since every appeal ("Photo") of the Earth that I've run though Forensics has been Manipulated.

Digital copies of paper images have a habit of being put through digital imaging software. The paper, on the other hand...

Post some...?

On the evidence so far there is little point. GIYF, but try this one

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710017145.pdf

Source File Please...?

That is the source file - I scanned my own paper copy.

Sure. When was CGI first Possible...?

Internet searches not working for you?

 

[Daniel]

Amazing how nobody has ever been able to see both Singapore and Chicago simultaneously from way up yonder in the sky, or even from the top of Mount Everest or Kilimanjaro

Can you be a little more specific than "way up yonder in the sky"?

Well our eyesight has limitations inherently, not even speaking to Atmospheric Conditions.

With Mount Everest at 29,029 Feet, the Horizon is at 208 Miles. Is Chicago or Singapore within 208 Miles of Mount Everest?


regards

 

[Daniel]

You think you can do that with a paper copy?

Nope.

On the evidence so far there is little point. GIYF, but try this one

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710017145.pdf

This isn't a Source File.

That is the source file - I scanned my own paper copy.

Are you kidding?

Internet searches not working for you?

Yes just fine; However, it's not "MY" Job to support "YOUR" Claims.


regards

 

[Andy_Ross]

If you measure the angle at base of the Humber Bridge towers they are 90 degrees to the ground. If you measure the distance between them they are 36 mm (1.4 inches) farther apart at the top. This is due to the curvature of the Earth.
If you measure the height of the road deck above the river Humber it is the same height right across but it is built with a curve, this is due to the curvature of the Earth.

It is a solid steel and concrete measure of the curvature compared to the bottom.

Similar length Suspension bridges such as Japan's Akashi Kaikyō Bridge and China's Xihoumen Bridge have similar characteristics.

 

[The Big Dog]

With Mount Everest at 29,029 Feet, the Horizon is at 208 Miles. Is Chicago or Singapore within 208 Miles of Mount Everest?

Sensational! You just managed to prove the earth is not flat.

 

[Dave Rogers]

With Mount Everest at 29,029 Feet, the Horizon is at 208 Miles. Is Chicago or Singapore within 208 Miles of Mount Everest?

The horizon is how distant, on a flat Earth?

Your mask slipped there. You need to get back in character.

Dave

 

[SOdhner]

So I can run them through Photo Forensics and Validate their Authenticity, Objectively.

I doubt that your "photo forensics" would remotely objective.

Yes, since every appeal ("Photo") of the Earth that I've run though Forensics has been Manipulated.

At some point you should examine the possibility that that's caused by your flawed methods.

Source File Please...?

You're setting up an impossible level of evidence. If it's new, then it's CGI. If it's old, you need to see the original negatives which obviously aren't going to be available.

Meanwhile, not only can the flat earthers not provide a *single* picture of the flat earth but they can't even come up with a map!

 

[DGM]

Sensational! You just managed to prove the earth is not flat.

He didn't mean to say that................