Not a terribly long CV.
I'd say that is he decides to run, this guy as a pretty good shot, and the best thing is that since he's from Texas, his running could really throw a lot of chaos into the election by turning Texas Blue!
Franken still has a shot.
I've seen people mention the Rock, but to what extent is this a serious suggestion?
Of course, I realize we are now in the universe where a total joke candidate has already been elected president, and if Donald Trump is not beyond the pale it is quite difficult to know who is, but still. Is there any serious consideration that The Rock's celebrity status is what is needed to dislodge The Comb-over Con-artist?
Just come up with someone without the baggage of a Clinton. I want you guys to get a better candidate. Not Warren for gawds sake, not Harris, not anybody I can think of off the top of my head.
Get a new face. I don't want to see anyone who made a headline in the last election because they all have the smell of Hillary on them. They are tainted and it won't work.
The Rock? Don't be stupid. Chelsea? If you want to lose.
If you guys had an even marginally better candidate I'd have voted Dem. Not that it would have mattered here in California. This time you're going to need someone better than "marginally".
And you/the left along with CNN and the gang kinda need to stfu a little and stop being whiny bitches. It's annoying. Change your delivery and pick your battles. My attitude in this post directly reflects my annoyance with the left in general right now. It's really bad. Just my opinion.
And you/the left along with CNN and the gang kinda need to stfu a little and stop being whiny bitches.
Just come up with someone without the baggage of a Clinton. I want you guys to get a better candidate. Not Warren for gawds sake, not Harris, not anybody I can think of off the top of my head.
Martin O'Malley. He's the guy I would have voted D for. Of course, you know what that means; he's the snowball trying to mountain bike through hell. It's like when the libs tell you they would have voted for what's his name--the former governor of Utah if he had been the nominee. I could look it up, but it's not the point. These guys are always going to be what's his name or alternately, what's her name.
And if there's one thing I can guarantee you, the Democrats will not nominate a moderate the next time around. I don't care if the economy is roaring and the Dow at 35,000, they are going to nominate somebody from the left flank. Bernie or Elizabeth; realistically I cannot imagine anyone else. Even if the economy is roaring (a distinct possibility with nothing coming out of Washington these days) I cannot imagine the base holding their nose for another establishment candidate.
And you/the left along with CNN and the gang kinda need to stfu a little and stop being whiny bitches. It's annoying. Change your delivery and pick your battles. My attitude in this post directly reflects my annoyance with the left in general right now. It's really bad. Just my opinion.
Well, I'm going to take a page from the right wing trolls on Twitter and various newsfeeds....
Good! It's working.
Yeah, 71 year old Elizabeth Warren, after just losing an election with another pushy broad running? Or 79 year old New York Socialist Jewboy.
As I said, these threads are helpful in seeing Republican wet dreams. Neither will be in consideration for 2020.
No, I would definitely much rather have a moderate Democrat win the nomination than a radical like Warren or Sanders. I don't expect Trump to be an exceptionally strong candidate the next time around and would like to hedge my bets.
But that's exactly why the left wing will push for a fire-breather.
"Castro"! The conspiracy theories will be awesome!
Trump is such damaged goods, I don't think the Dems need to play to their base here. A moderate Dem with a resume just long enough to be qualified but not long enough to have baggage could be the perfect choice.