Senator Al Franken Kissed and Groped Me Without My Consent, And There’s Nothing Funny

That bears no ressemblance to what Oystein said. How does that help the discussion?


Of course it does. He said explicitly that if the victims enjoyed it, it wasn't an assault, regardless of the circumstances. Take that to its logical conclusion, and you have the GOP position on sexual assault.

There is a profound double standard being waved like a flag here.

As I said before, if a pattern emerges for Franken, like it has for the others, then I would fully support and investigation and his resignation. However, I also believe that the more egregious cases and offenders should be addressed first.
 
Last edited:
Actually, they would deserve an argument. If you think they're not worth your time, you're spending a lot of it on them. Of course, we all know why.

You caught me, I am spending a lot of time pointing out that asserting that the woman who were groped were somehow tied in with Russian trolls is sub-no planer level conspiracy nonsense that must be exposed repeatedly as partisan idiocy of the lowest sort.

But you are certainly free to think that it “deserves” an argument and I am free to point out that Frankengrope was not an inside jobby job.
 
Of course it does. He said explicitly that if the victims enjoyed it, it wasn't an assault, regardless of the circumstances. Take that to its logical conclusion, and you have the GOP position on sexual assault.

It depends what you mean by "logical conclusion", or what you consider "enjoying" the act to mean. I took it to mean that they were fine with it at the time, which implies consent. I'm happy to be corrected if Oystein meant it differently.
 
Lots of innuendo and misrepresentation there. Not much worth responding to.
You're the one that said, "wrong answer." I found that offensive.

I'll just reiterate that it is obvious the Huffington Post accusers are not Russian trolls, and that bringing up Russian trolls is desperate.
You don't know what their motivation was.

Also, I know that Trump and Franken are accused of very different things, and I have said that over and over again.

I'm saying Franken is an apple, and Trump is an Orange, and then you are saying they are different.
And yet here you are asserting Franken should resign.

And stop poisoning the well all the time with things like elevatorgate. Again, you are bringing up different things to tell me that they are different.

Yes, I know that. I freakin know that.
I bring up elevatorgate because to me I see the same thing here with calling for a Senator to resign because he made a grope joke and there are some accusations which don't amount to a hell of beans.

You are more than welcome to disagree, but it's not well poisoning when it is my sincere opinion.
 
Do you see how we are miscommunicating?

I say apple and you accuse me of saying orange.

OK, my apologies, I've conflated your post with the others calling for his resignation.

What should we do then, condemn any and all grope jokes regardless of the context?
 
Gotta admire the way some folks are just going down with the ship. Reminds me of the pro-Weiner blogger who still insisted it was some plot to get him, even after Weiner fessed up.

ETA: I read Franken's book Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot. I could tell that he was trying to tell jokes, but the only one that made me laugh was when he pointed out that according to Rush Limbaugh, feminists believe that all heterosexual intercourse is rape. Al reported that he had met many feminists over the years, and only one of them agreed with that statement, and, "We've been happily married for 20 years."
Not sure if you are simply saying Franken's joke fell flat. But Limbaugh does spout that kind of hyperbole about feminists.

Franken's Lies: And the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right was also pretty good. And you have to admit lying pretty much has become the stock and trade of the alt-right and many in the GOP as well.
 
No, no no. You don't get to assign a meaning of your own concoction to my post. It wasn't an assumption or a rhetorical question. I suspect that you know this but have noticed yourself that your rape analogy was nonsense and don't want your answers to lead to that obvious conclusion.


The only one playing a game is you, with your reluctance to answer my points and questions with this pretense of precision. I made my meaning clear at all steps. That you keep adding content and meaning that isn't there isn't my problem.



Sure, things change. That still doesn't address my point about kissing your wife.



Then what's this:



You brought it up, and it was about rape.

Talk about not knowing when to stop digging!
 
Answering the question would have required a single post, rather than this long derail about how it shouldn't have been asked.
Which question are you talking about? The one that said I said something I hadn't done? I should have ignored the false statement?
 
You're the one that said, "wrong answer." I found that offensive.

You don't know what their motivation was.

And yet here you are asserting Franken should resign.

I bring up elevatorgate because to me I see the same thing here with calling for a Senator to resign because he made a grope joke and there are some accusations which don't amount to a hell of beans.

<snip>


Here's the problem, SG.

With two more women having come forward, a pattern of behavior has been shown. There has been sufficient corroboration of their claims to make it impossible to discount them.

How much it amounts to is an entirely different subject, and I have no problem with the idea that it is small potatoes when compared to things like Moore's pursuit of underage and young teenage girls, but the point is that the comparison is a different subject.

Franken has clearly shown a disrespectful pattern of behavior.

Whether or not it is one which warrants his removal from office is also a different question. If it were to result in that then I should hope that a baseline would be established which would treat more serious transgressions with appropriately more vigorous censure. I have to think that such a consequence would make more than a few other Congresscritters very nervous.

But it is a mistake to try and characterize an established pattern of behavior as insignificant. What he did was wrong. It may not have been as wrong. It may not have been nearly as wrong. But it was still wrong, and that needs to be recognized and accepted.

Then we can begin to put it in perspective.
 
Talk about not knowing when to stop digging!

What are you babbling about? I asked you a simple question, after you brought up something that is entirely irrelevant to my point. Will you answer it or not?

Which question are you talking about? The one that said I said something I hadn't done? I should have ignored the false statement?

Damn, you can be so obtuse when you want to. I don't know what this achieves for you.
 
Last edited:
Which question are you talking about? The one that said I said something I hadn't done? I should have ignored the false statement?

Argumemnon asked, "Do you really believe that I have to ask my wife's permission to kiss her every time?"

You could have just answered "no" rather than insist he is dishonest in asking this simple yes/no question. His question would have been more neutral if he had omitted "really", but all you had to do was say "no" and explain your answer, if necessary.
 
Argumemnon asked, "Do you really believe that I have to ask my wife's permission to kiss her every time?"

You could have just answered "no" rather than insist he is dishonest in asking this simple yes/no question. His question would have been more neutral if he had omitted "really", but all you had to do was say "no" and explain your answer, if necessary.

Well he can't really do that, see, because he absolutely has to answer "no" to the question, which of course then makes his rape analogy null and void. He brought it up by assuming that the idea of "implied consent", which had been used to justify rape in the past, was just as spurrious here. However, he can't defend that last bit, and he doesn't want to admit to his mistake, hence the misdirection about my wording.
 
I cannot believe that Russian trolls infiltrated the USO ten years ago.

They are far more clever than I gave them credit for.

Frankengrope is an Inside Job.
 
Here's the problem, SG.

With two more women having come forward, a pattern of behavior has been shown. There has been sufficient corroboration of their claims to make it impossible to discount them.

How much it amounts to is an entirely different subject, and I have no problem with the idea that it is small potatoes when compared to things like Moore's pursuit of underage and young teenage girls, but the point is that the comparison is a different subject.

Franken has clearly shown a disrespectful pattern of behavior.
He's actually the only one that has been respectful.

Pattern of behavior - you do need to look at his actual pattern you know. Not just the accusations by themselves.

From the latest HuffPo article:
In a statement to HuffPost, Franken said, “It’s difficult to respond to anonymous accusers, and I don’t remember those campaign events.”
The second woman told HuffPost that Franken cupped her butt with his hand at a 2008 Democratic fundraiser in Minneapolis, then suggested the two visit the bathroom together. She spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear that the allegation could affect her position at work....

“I can categorically say that I did not proposition anyone to join me in any bathroom,” Franken told HuffPost.

...But it is a mistake to try and characterize an established pattern of behavior as insignificant. ...
Just like it's a mistake to conclude these accusations show an actual pattern other than grope jokes have been common in Franken's comedy career.

One woman in this story did not tell HuffPo who she was so that the story could be verified. I can see not wanting HuffPo to reveal the name, but to just call up and make this anonymous accusation, that Franken flatly denies, and we still don't have an actual pattern. We are supposed to believe Franken secretly grabs asses and no one knows about it that is around him all the time.


And then there's this one:
The first woman, a 38-year-old book editor who was living in Minneapolis at the time, told HuffPost that she had just finished performing with a feminist choir at the Women’s Political Caucus event, which Franken and his wife, Franni Bryson, attended. After the ceremony, she and other members of the choir approached him for photos.

“My mother loves Al Franken. She listened to Air America [on which Franken had a radio show] every day,” the first woman said. ”I saw him and asked if we could take a photo together for my mother, and we stood next to each other ... and down his hand went.”

HuffPost spoke to two sources close to the first woman who corroborated her account.
"Down went his hand" :rolleyes:

I can see any number of scenarios here.
1) An innocent placement of a hand where people put arms around each other for a group photo and an overzealous feminist who is sure it was a purposeful butt grab. Heaven knows we've seen that in our own skeptic community.

2) Franken is a serial butt grabber: when his wife is around, when the women's husbands are around. :rolleyes:

3) Outright lies with a political motive.​
I don't find #2 credible at this point. And I'm not going to be PC'd into it lest someone accuse me of a double standard, especially given, BTW, many of those same people admit this is not anything like the other sexual harassment scenarios.

And that should be a clue here. With the rest of these guys we have actual sexual abuse and harassment, including multiple reports that "everybody knew". There is no questionable couple of seconds that may or may not have been valid perceptions in the other cases.

In addition Franken has decades of supporting women and women's causes, no history of serial affairs cheating on his wife, coworkers willing to support him from two different work settings, justification for kissing in the skit in question, Tweeden's double standard re grope jokes, Franken's very sensitive-to-the-accuser apology ...

No, I won't be PC'd into ignoring all the facts in Franken's case and jumping on the 'OMG he's one of them' bandwagon.
 
Last edited:
I will not be PC’d into not accusing the four women of lying in a decade long con that includes infiltrating the USO by trolls under the control of the Russian government.

Frankengrope was an Inside Job.
 
Argumemnon asked, "Do you really believe that I have to ask my wife's permission to kiss her every time?"

You could have just answered "no" rather than insist he is dishonest in asking this simple yes/no question. His question would have been more neutral if he had omitted "really", but all you had to do was say "no" and explain your answer, if necessary.
I didn't suggest he was dishonest? Where has that come from?
 

Back
Top Bottom