Gratitude, Compulsion, Idiocy or Nobility?

[Mojo]

All that's been proved here is that you haven't a clue about science. You are claiming that something based on dogma is scientific.

That is A&F. Nothing can deny it that beneficial affects from faith and those religious practices are scientific and so religion has scientific basis. I feel, Jay others in ego may be avoiding to reply those questións due to this reason. But appreciation for them who replied truly.

Res ipsa loquitur.

 

[Kumar]

All that's been proved here is that you haven't a clue about science. You are claiming that something based on dogma is scientific.

That is A&F. Nothing can deny it that beneficial affects from faith and those religious practices are scientific and so religion has scientific basis. I feel, Jay others in ego may be avoiding to reply those questións due to this reason. But appreciation for them who replied truly.

 

[Kumar]

Res ipsa loquitur.

That, refer to my those two questions and true replies to those. Leave irrational skepticism.

 

[Mojo]

That, refer to my those two questions and true replies to those.

No, it very clearly doesn't.

 

[Kumar]

No, it very clearly doesn't.

No one can deny except skeptics in ego.

 

[Peregrinus]

That is A&F.

For the hundred and twoth time, there is no such thing.

religion has scientific basis.

That's not even wrong.

 

[StackOverflow]

That is A&F. Nothing can deny it that beneficial affects from faith and those religious practices are scientific and so religion has scientific basis. I feel, Jay others in ego may be avoiding to reply those questións due to this reason. But appreciation for them who replied truly.

No

 

[Filippo Lippi]

You tend to talk, just one sided/your sided thing without looking other sided presentations. Be equanimious pls. More, proof you can find on following quote:

Lord Mahavira
Name: Vardhamana

Birth: 599 B.C.

Birth Place: Kshatriyakund, Vaishali (in modern day Bihar)

Parents: Kingh Siddhartha and Queen Trishala

Spouse: Yashoda

Children: Priyadarshana (daughter)

Titles: Mahavira, Trirthankar, Jina

Age of Attaining Kevala Jnana: 42 years

Ideology: Jainism

Death: 527 B.C.

Age of attaining Moksha: 72 years
He preached that the real path leading to attainment of liberation from the cycle of Karma is through Samyak Darshana (right faith), Samyak Jnana (right knowledge) and Samyak Charitra (right character). These three basic principles were further elaborated by the Gandhar Gautama Swami into the twelve parts sacred scriptures known as the 12 Agamas. Sermons of Lord Mahaveera were compiled in the Agam Sutras by his disciples and were passed on to the common people through oral recitations.

These scriptures prescribe 5 basic vows that should be observed by monks and common disciples alike. These five basic vows are
http://www.culturalindia.net/indian-.../mahavira.html

Hi Kumar,

this omniscient guy, what did he invent? What great inventions have flowed from other omniscient Jains?

Fil

 

[MRC_Hans]

You tend to talk, just one sided/your sided thing without looking other sided presentations. Be equanimious pls. More, proof you can find on following quote:

You tend to talk, just one sided/your sided thing without looking other sided presentations. Be equanimious pls. More, proof you can find on following

Lord Mahavira
Name: Vardhamana

Birth: 599 B.C.

Birth Place: Kshatriyakund, Vaishali (in modern day Bihar)

Parents: Kingh Siddhartha and Queen Trishala

Spouse: Yashoda

Children: Priyadarshana (daughter)

Titles: Mahavira, Trirthankar, Jina

Age of Attaining Kevala Jnana: 42 years

Ideology: Jainism

Death: 527 B.C.

Age of attaining Moksha: 72 years
He preached that the real path leading to attainment of liberation from the cycle of Karma is through Samyak Darshana (right faith), Samyak Jnana (right knowledge) and Samyak Charitra (right character). These three basic principles were further elaborated by the Gandhar Gautama Swami into the twelve parts sacred scriptures known as the 12 Agamas. Sermons of Lord Mahaveera were compiled in the Agam Sutras by his disciples and were passed on to the common people through oral recitations.

MMM, forgot to mention this. So this guy was born in 599 BC and died in 527 BC, which happens to be 28 years later. Yet he attained "Moksha" (whatever that is) at an age of 72. How does that work, Kumar? OK maybe just a typo or something, but are we still to trust this source as something even resembling proof?

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

That is A&F. Nothing can deny it that beneficial affects from faith and those religious practices are scientific and so religion has scientific basis.

Very funny. SO if someone says water is wet, he is a scientist?

Don't be ridiculous, Kumar.

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

Sorry. I accept my mistake. That post about odd skepticism is not meant for you though you have also interacted. You mostly contributed to me. Pls do not mind.

OK, but I mind. Almost everybody here has tried to seriously argue with you. Sure the form varies, but didn't you say that language does not matter? Why are you not equianimous and realize that by insulting one you insult everybody?

Hans

 

[MRC_Hans]

It is not nécessary, one who need to practice religión, can not do roútine works for his need. The issue is whether he is involved in good practice or not. Wealthy life or poor life is not relàted to relígióus life because ít does not need more money.

It does not matter to you that the adherents of your idea of the right life can only pursue it by exploiting others who must to the work for them? Well, I think it matters a lot. It means that your idea of the right life is not available to all.

Anyway màin issue:
So it is confirmed that religións çreate faith and varióús healthfúl activíties. So both of these have scientifically proved benéfits so it alsó proves religións, jainism or other have scientific benefits, so scientific. So claims made by Jay and other that Jainism ís not scientific are proven false.

This is beyond ridiculous. So because a religion (together with numerous other religions) made an observation that was later confirmed by science, the religion is scientific? SO where are the scientific studies that led them to this?

OK, simply, Kumar, you have shown you don't know what science is about.

Hans

 

[Filippo Lippi]

You tend to talk, just one sided/your sided thing without looking other sided presentations. Be equanimious pls. More, proof you can find on following




MMM, forgot to mention this. So this guy was born in 599 BC and died in 527 BC, which happens to be 28 years later. Yet he attained "Moksha" (whatever that is) at an age of 72. How does that work, Kumar? OK maybe just a typo or something, but are we still to trust this source as something even resembling proof?

Hans

Might want to check your figures there

 

[MRC_Hans]

Might want to check your figures there

Ya right . Well ... so "Moksha" means death. Cool. Still, all is conjecture.

Hans

 

[Kumar]

Hi Kumar,

this omniscient guy, what did he invent? What great inventions have flowed from other omniscient Jains?

Fil

Do google search for more. Morality, sprituality, humanity, health, non violence, truth, ratiónals...means all really good for beings to extreme are few of hís works.

 

[Kumar]

Hi Kumar,

this omniscient guy, what did he invent? What great inventions have flowed from other omniscient Jains?

Fil

Might want to check your figures there

Beauty of taking things with equanimity. Thanks.

 

[Kumar]

Very funny. SO if someone says water is wet, he is a scientist?

Don't be ridiculous, Kumar.

Hans

Origionally, who told, he was. However, by just oné rain drop, if anyone can predict rain is following, yes he is a scientist.

 

[Kumar]

You tend to talk, just one sided/your sided thing without looking other sided presentations. Be equanimious pls. More, proof you can find on f



MMM, forgot to mention this. So this guy was born in 599 BC and died in 527 BC, which happens to be 28 years later. Yet he attained "Moksha" (whatever that is) at an age of 72. How does that work, Kumar? OK maybe just a typo or something, but are we still to trust this source as something even resembling proof?

Hans

Good example of odd preception. Avoid.

 

[Kumar]

OK, but I mind. Almost everybody here has tried to seriously argue with you. Sure the form varies, but didn't you say that language does not matter? Why are you not equianimous and realize that by insulting one you insult everybody?

Hans

Good example of cordinate movement ín courtesy. Deal indepentaly.

 

[Kumar]

Ya right . Well ... so "Moksha" means death. Cool. Still, all is conjecture.

Hans

Good example of acceptance of truth but also of ego.