Gratitude, Compulsion, Idiocy or Nobility?

[Mojo]

My signature.

You are an expert in nonsense?

 

[Filippo Lippi]

It's A&F

 

[Pixel42]

But payback and investment should also match.

Payback is usually greater than investment. Otherwise there's no point in the investment.

People who grow plants for a living either make a profit, or they go out of business.

Still they are live beings.

Plants are living things, yes. And?

Moreover others such?

Moreover other what such what?

 

[Kumar]

Kumar, Newton's laws of motion describe how forces act on physical bodies, and the results of that. They are nothing to do with how intelligent beings should behave in a debate.

No. To "action". Do you want to suggest, he has wrongly mentioned "action" in his law? Should this law had to be: for every motion there is equal and opposite.....?

 

[StackOverflow]

You are wrong, as always.

 

[Kumar]

Payback is usually greater than investment. Otherwise there's no point in the investment.

People who grow plants for a living either make a profit, or they go out of business.


Plants are living things, yes. And?


Moreover other what such what?

Life esp generation life and money & efforts have no relevance. Evaluate it by own.

 

[Pixel42]

nm

 

[Kumar]

You are wrong, as always.

Obiously, dynamic thing can be odd to routine.

 

[StackOverflow]

Wrong

 

[Kumar]

Wrong

Then what?

 

[StackOverflow]

No

 

[Kumar]

No

Then what?

 

[Pixel42]

No. To "action". Do you want to suggest, he has wrongly mentioned "action" in his law? Should this law had to be: for every motion there is equal and opposite.....?

The law makes it perfectly clear what kind of action is being referred to.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA19&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

"The mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts".

These days the third law is more usually stated as "When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body."

 

[StackOverflow]

Then what?

No

 

[Kumar]

The law makes it perfectly clear what kind of action is being referred to.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA19&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

"The mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts".

These days the third law is more usually stated as "When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body."

What to do? Science is not A&F, so, so many daily changes.

Btw, How some investment and destroying whole generation is equal & opposite to each other?

When we stop a moving pendulum or bring things in its local natural Position, how this law will be applicable?

 

[Pixel42]

What to do? Science is not A&F, so, so many daily changes.

The third law has not changed. Only the language which is used to express it.

When we stop a moving pendulum or bring things in its local natural Position, how this law will be applicable?

Once again, this is a discussion forum not a teaching forum. If you want to know the answer to this question, look it up.

 

[Kumar]

The third law has not changed. Only the language which is used to express it.


Once again, this is a discussion forum not a teaching forum. If you want to know the answer to this question, look it up.

What was need to change the language? Probably whole may just be a language change, real sense was invented long back in different language.

As edited the last post:
Btw, How some investment and destroying whole generation is equal & opposite to each other?

 

[StackOverflow]

No

 

[Pixel42]

What was need to change the language?

Languages change whether anyone needs them to or not. Also people often find better ways to express the same ideas.

Probably whole may just be a language change, real sense was invented long back in different language.

If you're suggesting that someone else might have worked out Newton's third law of motion before Newton did, yes that's perfectly possible. Newton was the first person we know of who captured it in writing.

As edited the last post:
Btw, How some investment and destroying whole generation is equal & opposite to each other?

???

 

[Kumar]

Languages change whether anyone needs them to or not. Also people often find better ways to express the same ideas.


If you're suggesting that someone else might have worked out Newton's third law of motion before Newton did, yes that's perfectly possible. Newton was the first person we know of who captured it in writing.


???

Tit for tat. One who dig pit for other fall into it himself. Do regard everyone as you do to yourself....there may be some many different languages to it since long back. I do not know, how fall back electron after excitation and emitting photon, obey this rule?