Senator Al Franken Kissed and Groped Me Without My Consent, And There’s Nothing Funny

PhantomWolf said:
What effect? Have the pictures altered anyone's opinion as to her credibility? The only effect I have seen of it is that you have carried on with this one horse stage show for 9 pages now instead of joining in with the rest of the conversation. All you have done in the last nine pages is scream "slut shaming".

Do you think that the NSFW photos damage her credibility? Does anyone here? If not, then why are you still going on about this after other 450 posts in this thread. Seems that the one with the issue here might be you because you are the one that keeps bring it up.
Click to expand...

Curious, you did not actually address my post that you quoted. Huh.

Or the post I was replying to.

Curious
 
PhantomWolf said:
What effect? Have the pictures altered anyone's opinion as to her credibility? The only effect I have seen of it is that you have carried on with this one horse stage show for 9 pages now instead of joining in with the rest of the conversation. All you have done in the last nine pages is scream "slut shaming".

Do you think that the NSFW photos damage her credibility? Does anyone here? If not, then why are you still going on about this after other 450 posts in this thread. Seems that the one with the issue here might be you because you are the one that keeps bring it up.
Click to expand...

Because it was classic slut shaming and instead of condemning it, people are still trying to defend it.
 
PhantomWolf said:
Do you think that her posing in scantily clad photos damages her credibility?
Click to expand...

No, because it’s completely normal. If she was totally naked, does that give a man the green light to do what he likes?

Why is this so difficult for those on the left to understand?
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I thought 'dong' among other words were worse. By all means do tell us the PC word I should have used.

Penis I guess, I'll try not to offend you. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Hmm, If the offensiveness of the C word is to call a woman that, inferring that woman are only sex organs, I guess you shouldn't call a guy a Dick. But "C" as a substitute for vagina is about like calling a guys parts Junk, don't you think? There's Johnson, Prick(too weapon-ish?) , Package (for the whole ensemble),... lots of works more neutral than Junk. Dong is a bit jokish, I see why you didn't go with it.

Anyway, lets drop the tah-tahs and get out uglies back on subject. :D
 
logger said:
Lol

Just as telling people he WASNT wearing a red dress is a lie too? Can’t make this stuff up folks!
Click to expand...

Not surprisingly, nuances don't work real well with you.

The fact is the records do not say Roy Moore Wasn't Banned or Roy Moore Was Banned because the records don't exist.

If one is a lie the other is, too. You wish to call one (the evil librul one) a lie, and the other not. Neither is proven. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Might be evidence of absinthe, but that's another thread.
 
PhantomWolf said:
Curious, you did not answer a single question in my post. Huh.

Curious.
Click to expand...

Nothing curious about it.

But yeah, the single solitary purpose in bringing up her history and her nsfw pictures was to blatantly attack her credibility even though it was utterly irrelevant to her claims and the *********** scumbags despicable conduct.

You dig?
 
angrysoba said:
Does her history of working at Hooters or posing nude for Playboy have any relevance to her allegations against Franken?

I think it is a dangerous route to go down.
Click to expand...
Yes, it is relevant and you don't have to agree, but it's bull **** to claim my point has anything to do with slut shaming.

Two things, if your whole adult life has included men objectifying you, it's possible you interpret men's actions through that bias about men.

And two, listening to this woman's obsession over the last 10 years (her statement is that this has been burning her up for 10 years) with this one USO tour and this one man, one has to ask why is that? Was Franken really that offensive or does Tweeden's hate for him color her perception?

The complaint is that the skit he wrote was offensive. That makes him a jerk for not asking if she was OK with the skit or noticing she wasn't. And we have her claim he used his tongue (it's my understanding actors don't use their tongues in kissing scenes). If Franken used skits to get tongue kisses I expect we should see other victims coming forward. We still haven't.

As for the grope joke, I'm sorry but a grope is not the same as a pretend one.

You don't have to agree but like I said, it's bull **** to claim this has jack to do with slut shaming. At least get the argument right.
 
casebro said:
Hmm, If the offensiveness of the C word is to call a woman that, inferring that woman are only sex organs, I guess you shouldn't call a guy a Dick. But "C" as a substitute for vagina is about like calling a guys parts Junk, don't you think? There's Johnson, Prick(too weapon-ish?) , Package (for the whole ensemble),... lots of works more neutral than Junk. Dong is a bit jokish, I see why you didn't go with it.

Anyway, lets drop the tah-tahs and get out uglies back on subject. :D
Click to expand...

"Junk" doesn't have any ugly connotations. Never has. Guys use it all the time,... affectionately.

No. You're wrong. Incorrect. Misinterpretation. Whatever. Drop it.
 
Foolmewunz said:
Not surprisingly, nuances don't work real well with you.

The fact is the records do not say Roy Moore Wasn't Banned or Roy Moore Was Banned because the records don't exist.

If one is a lie the other is, too. You wish to call one (the evil librul one) a lie, and the other not. Neither is proven. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Might be evidence of absinthe, but that's another thread.
Click to expand...

Actually you’re wrong again. The only reason I’ve been posting about this lie is because of all the uninformed people on here saying he was banned when in fact there is no proof of that. The fact that the people posting the lie are liberals should also help you with your other earlier accusations.
 
The Big Dog said:
Nothing curious about it.

But yeah, the single solitary purpose in bringing up her history and her nsfw pictures was to blatantly attack her credibility even though it was utterly irrelevant to her claims and the *********** scumbags despicable conduct.

You dig?
Click to expand...

Do you think that her credibility was damaged because of the pictures?
 
PhantomWolf said:
Has anyone in this thread stated that she is less credible because she posed for scantily clad photos?
Click to expand...

:eek:

Is this serious???

Why do you think they brought it up. She worked at hooters, she got groped before, hmm, why would she attack poor al franken? Hmmm.

Here are some nsfw photos to prove she probably got groped, while working at hooters. Did I mention she worked at hooters.
 
PhantomWolf said:
Do you think that her credibility was damaged because of the pictures?
Click to expand...

I absolutely have shown that was the intent in bringing up those grossly irrelevant history and photos.

You find the argument why they were brought up convincing?

You said, no, right? Right.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Yes, it is relevant and you don't have to agree, but it's bull **** to claim my point has anything to do with slut shaming.

Two things, if your whole adult life has included men objectifying you, it's possible you interpret men's actions through that bias about men.
Click to expand...

Lol
Except when a butt ugly Senator shoves his nasty tongue down your throat and grabs your boobs when you’re asleep. I suspect she’s interpreting it correctly. That you think she off in her interpretation is again, wait for it, CLASSIC SLUT SHAMING!!!!
And two, listening to this woman's obsession over the last 10 years (her statement is that this has been burning her up for 10 years) with this one USO tour and this one man, one has to ask why is that? Was Franken really that offensive or does Tweeden's hate for him color her perception?
Click to expand...

Because the victim should like her attacker? Holy ****
Anyone want to defend this one?
The complaint is that the skit he wrote was offensive. That makes him a jerk for not asking if she was OK with the skit or noticing she wasn't. And we have her claim he used his tongue (it's my understanding actors don't use their tongues in kissing scenes). If Franken used skits to get tongue kisses I expect we should see other victims coming forward. We still haven't.
Click to expand...

With witnesses, somehow she’s lying? Frankestein couldnt have used his tongue because actors don’t use their tongues. Lol

You don't have to agree but like I said, it's bull **** to claim this has jack to do with slut shaming. At least get the argument right.
Click to expand...
It’s classic slut shaming and you’re still doing it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom