New telepathy test, the sequel.

I have no reason to object to your explanations about that game.


I see that you received my thoughts about the silly quiz. It would be better for you to admit it. Your great discomfort when confronted with my telepathic powers is making you very agressive.


It's nasty and very low-level though (the phone calls did not happen like that). I think that this forum has a problem with reality.


Sadly, you have reverted to your outright aggression. You continue to score very low on credibility.
 
Actually, people have called me and told me I am telepathic, but this happened after telepathy tests on the phone, after I had put an ad in newspapers,
where I had given my phone number
(they did not have to divine it).

Is this response supposed to be a joke? How many phone calls did you get before you handed out your phone number in a publication? Let me guess! None!

Norm
 
Is this response supposed to be a joke? How many phone calls did you get before you handed out your phone number in a publication? Let me guess! None!

Norm
Yes, of course, none. I put ads in newspapers asking people to participate in telepathy tests on the phone with me, and gave my phone number. Then people rang, we did the test, and then I asked my question about being "telepathically special".
 
But once people have guessed the number of my temporary phone (if that happens), the next step is to guess the numbers of my fixed and mobile phones. No, thank you.

Nobody would have to guess anything. You'd be telling them, with your thoughts.

Unless you projected your other numbers, nobody would know what they are. Unless you can't help projecting them, in which case everybody already knows what they are.

It would be less natural, I think. I don't want to urge people to become super-telepaths (but nothing would probably happen, anyway).

I thought you were the telepath, not other people.
 
If this is the only evidence you can present for your alleged telepathic superpowers, I don't think many people will be convinced, even on a ... hum ... more "advanced" site or forum. One annoying aspect of my apparent telepathic singularity (which I don't see as a superpower) is that I often hear voices who are trying to convince me to kill myself. And this is definitely not a superpower.

I know that you don't want to hear that you're schizophrenic, but what you're describing is a common symptom of schizophrenia.
 
I see that you received my thoughts about the silly quiz. It would be better for you to admit it. Your great discomfort when confronted with my telepathic powers is making you very agressive.
...
I did not "receive your thoughts" about the quiz. I read your explanations, and I think you did an very impressive job in a short time (actually you helped me understand the question about medal placing, that I had not understood). However, I am a little bit puzzled about your sudden grandiose idea of being a "super-telepath" and thought broadcaster. I don't want to be nasty myself but ... bad reaction to meds, or what?
 
Last edited:
I did not "receive your thoughts" about the quiz. I read your explanations, and I think you did an very impressive job in a short time (actually you helped me understand the question about medal placing, that I had not understood). However, I am a little bit puzzled about your sudden grandiose idea of being a "super-telepath" and thought broadcaster. I don't want to be nasty myself but ... bad reaction to meds, or what?

This post scores very low in credibility. You continue to be aggressive and nasty and your verbosity betrays a tendency towards telling fibs. You used "...an very..." when it should have been "...a very...". You're obviously projecting your own nastiness and bad reaction to meds.
 
I often hear voices who are trying to convince me to kill myself.

Logic Problem
When Michel H hears someone's voice, he is the only one who hears it. Otherwise billions of people would have received the message "Kill yourself"

So Michel H then claims we all hear his voice, which means he is making this story up.
:)
 
I did not "receive your thoughts" about the quiz. I read your explanations, and I think you did an very impressive job in a short time (actually you helped me understand the question about medal placing, that I had not understood). However, I am a little bit puzzled about your sudden grandiose idea of being a "super-telepath" and thought broadcaster. I don't want to be nasty myself but ... bad reaction to meds, or what?



You are getting more and more aggressive. This shows me, according to your own rules, that you are not trustworthy. Thus, you deny that I broadcast my thoughts when you know perfectly well that I did.

You consider my claim to be telepathic to be "grandiose" and a "bad reaction to meds" while you continue to make the exact same claims. It is disappointing that your fear and jealousy of my ability is causing you to act like this. Maybe you should take some time to really examine how badly you feel about my powers.

Incidentally, I just want to tell one of the posters here: it's under the sink. He knows which one he is.
 
If this is the only evidence you can present for your alleged telepathic superpowers, I don't think many people will be convinced, even on a ... hum ... more "advanced" site or forum. One annoying aspect of my apparent telepathic singularity (which I don't see as a superpower) is that I often hear voices who are trying to convince me to kill myself. And this is definitely not a superpower.

Seek help. You are not telepathic. You are schizophrenic. There is no reason for you to live with these voices.
 
So, are you saying now that your "famous" correct answer of four years ago:

was actually genuine and serious (not a lie), and that you really did use telepathy? (I suppose this is roughly true btw, but you did not always say so).
Loss Leader has made it abundantly clear on several occasions that the post of his you keep quoting was intended sarcastically, and that he can no more hear anyone's thought (including yours) than anyone else can, ie not at all. As you have refused to accept this he has decided to adopt a different, interesting tactic: he will pretend that your interpretation is correct, and take this interpretation to its logical conclusion: he will claim that he is even more telepathic than you are.

It is perfectly clear to everyone else what he is doing. Ask yourself why you cannot see it, or the obvious sarcasm in his original reply (he even used "it's almost as though", a clear signal that the comment is meant sarcastically).
 
Michel,




***


Whatever you do

It is CRUCIAL that you




DO NOT THINK OF YOUR PHONE NUMBER






***


Be safe up there, in your head.
 
... You used "...an very..." when it should have been "...a very...". ...
Yes, that's right. Unfortunately, I can no longer edit this post. I believe it would be much better if members could still edit their posts even several days after submitting them to correct errors (with a possibility for all members to review previous versions of any post). I have already made this suggestion on this forum, but it was not accepted by the management.
 
You are getting more and more aggressive. ...
I am sorry if I sound sometimes a little rude but my own ethical rules require me to always try to tell it "like it is", to say the truth as I understand it (while acknowledging positive contributions from others), instead of a behavior which might be perceived as more socially acceptable. Should my own rules conflict with the rules of this forum, I would hope the moderator team will take the context into account. I am getting a lot of attacks, so it is normal that I fight back.

Sometimes, I feel a little, on this forum, like a person who would be trying to sell "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins in Vatican City (the "Vatican City" of Skepticism, here, on this forum). Not the most comfortable of situations.
 
I am sorry if I sound sometimes a little rude but my own ethical rules require me to always try to tell it "like it is", to say the truth as I understand it


No, you are saying what you convince yourself of because you are afraid to confront the fact that I am a true telepath and that you have no special powers. By your own rules, this causes you to lie. That is what you are doing now.


Sometimes, I feel a little, on this forum, like a person who would be trying to sell "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins in Vatican City (the "Vatican City" of Skepticism, here, on this forum). Not the most comfortable of situations.


This is extraordinarily hostile. It shows that you continue to lack credibility. Stop lying.
 
Last edited:
I am sorry if I sound sometimes a little rude but my own ethical rules require me to always try to tell it "like it is",
No, your ego requires that you rudely and aggressively attack those who challenge your fragile beliefs. You know you have no special powers but you feel the need to insult others, destroying your credibility.

to say the truth as I understand it (while acknowledging positive contributions from others), instead of a behavior which might be perceived as more socially acceptable. Should my own rules conflict with the rules of this forum, I would hope the moderator team will take the context into account. I am getting a lot of attacks, so it is normal that I fight back.
No, your beliefs are being challenged and you see that as am attack on you personally. You've just lost more credibility.

Sometimes, I feel a little, on this forum, like a person who would be trying to sell "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins in Vatican City (the "Vatican City" of Skepticism, here, on this forum). Not the most comfortable of situations.
Why do you feel the need to type on an Internet forum? Just think at us. Oh, that's right, you know you don't have any powers.
 
Sometimes, I feel a little, on this forum, like a person who would be trying to sell "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins in Vatican City (the "Vatican City" of Skepticism, here, on this forum). Not the most comfortable of situations.

That's not a good analogy because sceptics are not ideologically opposed to the existence of telepathy and have no emotional investment in its non-existence. On the contrary if objective evidence of telepathy's existence was produced most sceptics would be delighted, as it would open up a new and exciting field of study. A sceptic is simply someone that doesn't accept claims if there is no objective evidence to support them. We're mostly a bunch of nerds who enjoy science fiction and are actually a bit disappointed that telepathy, and other such potentially interesting phenomena, do not exist.
 

Back
Top Bottom