Gratitude, Compulsion, Idiocy or Nobility?

[Kumar]

Kumar, for a person who so depends on Wikipedia for answers when it's convenient, you certainly are not very diligent in finding out things for yourself.

The Wikipedia article on the fallacy of "Begging the Question."

It took me about 20 seconds to look this up, including typing time.

If you can't be reasonable, at least don't be lazy.

MPOVs were indicated even on it. so...

 

[Kumar]

You can "insist" on whatever you want. That doesn't make it rational.



You thought it was important when you thought it was an authentic quote.



No, quote has no value unless it was said by the person you allege. Its significance and authority in an argument depends on the stature of the person who said it. Without that, all you have is an anonymous opinion that Jainism is scientific. What we have discovered, however, is that Jain authors and scholars are not above lying in order to evangelize. Are you also a liar?

No value of theory in A&F. Only practical and mass existence since long with least side affects is practical.

 

[Kumar]

Your argument was that religion should be considered always to provide benefits. You were presented with counterexamples. Now you are saying religion has good and bad elements. That concedes your claim. If religions are not universally beneficial, then you have the burden to prove yours is one of the good ones. You don't get to rely anymore on the categorical argument that you have conceded.

Lie. Nothing was provided as A&F proofs.

 

[JayUtah]

Best Justification already provided relevant to nature of substance.

Already provided and refuted. If you have nothing better, then your argument fails.

Whatever you in joint think, is your problem not mine.

If you're alleging fact, your inability to prove it is entirely your fault.

Otherwise bring Time Machine, I shall accompany and show practically.

Straw man. A time machine is not necessary to substantiate allegations of history.

 

[JayUtah]

No value of theory in A&F. Only practical and mass existence since long with least side affects is practical.

Gibberish.

 

[JayUtah]

Lie. Nothing was provided as A&F proofs.

"A&F" is your problem, not anyone else's. You did not address anything in my post. Nor have you answered the question of whether you're a scientist. Are you a scientist? Yes or no.

 

[Kumar]

None of this has anything to do with what I wrote or the question I asked. Are you a scientist? Yes or no.

How scientist is involved in Religion forum? On the contrary it is odd to it. Moreover, factual scientist and apparent scientist can be two different entities--may be opposing.

 

[JayUtah]

How scientist is involved in Religion forum? On the contrary it is odd to it. Moreover, factual scientist and apparent scientist can be two different entities--may be opposing.

Why are you evading the question? Are you a scientist? Yes or no.

 

[Kumar]

"A&F" is your problem, not anyone else's. You did not address anything in my post. Nor have you answered the question of whether you're a scientist. Are you a scientist? Yes or no.

Here, all of you are one one side, united & manipulative to hunt, I only(may be one or two more?) on other side. So yours statements are quite injustified against the playing & rational rules.

 

[JayUtah]

Here, all of you are one one side, united & manipulative to hunt, I only(may be one or two more?) on other side. So yours statements are quite injustified against the playing & rational rules.

Quit whining and answer my question. Are you a scientist? Yes or no.

 

[Kumar]

Already provided and refuted. If you have nothing better, then your argument fails.



If you're alleging fact, your inability to prove it is entirely your fault.



Straw man. A time machine is not necessary to substantiate allegations of history.

No end to aurgument. So ending after providing justifications.

 

[bruto]

MPOVs were indicated even on it. so...

You claimed that you did not know the meaning of a common expression that is easily looked up. So nothing. Doubling down on mistakes is an ugly habit.

 

[JayUtah]

No end to aurgument. So ending after providing justifications.

No, ending after your refusal to address the rebuttals to your proposed justifications. Only not ending, because you're just going to keep pontificating and ignoring the critics you can't answer.

 

[Kumar]

Quit whining and answer my question. Are you a scientist? Yes or no.

Can't say as per you.

 

[Kumar]

Why are you evading the question? Are you a scientist? Yes or no.

It can not be or anything unless A&F, can not be interpreted on one side. So...

 

[JayUtah]

Can't say as per you.

Why are you avoiding a simple question? Are you a scientist? Yes or no.

 

[Kumar]

No, ending after your refusal to address the rebuttals to your proposed justifications. Only not ending, because you're just going to keep pontificating and ignoring the critics you can't answer.

Provided but not digestible by you. You simply want, what you want. Achieve equanimity, if not at least rationality. I can understand, you can. Good luck.

 

[JayUtah]

Provided but not digestible by you. You simply want, what you want. Achieve equanimity, if not at least rationality. I can understand, you can. Good luck.

No, you quoted my rebuttal and admitted you had no better argument than the one I had already rebutted. In debate, that means you lost. Blabber all you want about "equanimity." Some questions have right and wrong answers and if you end up on the wrong side, the Jain oath of honesty suggests a different course of action than the one you're taking.

 

[Kumar]

No, you quoted my rebuttal and admitted you had no better argument than the one I had already rebutted. In debate, that means you lost. Blabber all you want about "equanimity." Some questions have right and wrong answers and if you end up on the wrong side, the Jain oath of honesty suggests a different course of action than the one you're taking.

I am neither ídiot nor compulsion alike those animals. Yes, it could had been gratitude or nobility from my part, if odds would hàd been opted by other side.
Good to become truthful or atleast rational sceptical like me but very bad otherwise. Losing placebo is nót a good thing.

 

[JayUtah]

I am neither ídiot nor compulsion alike those animals. Yes, it could had been gratitude or nobility from my part, if odds would hàd been opted by other side.
Good to become truthful or atleast rational sceptical like me but very bad otherwise. Losing placebo is nót a good thing.

Gibberish.