Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dr. Keith said:
There are 11 GOP nominees scratching their heads thinking "****, I wish I had thought of that."
Click to expand...


Don't forget that while Killary had the DNC in her pocket already, she was plotting to get the media to cover the more extreme "pied piper" GOP candidates - like Teh Donald - to make them look as representing the opponent. As Assange is pointing out. She got what she wanted, the stupid turd.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Don't forget that while Killary had the DNC in her pocket already, she was plotting to get the media to cover the more extreme "pied piper" GOP candidates - like Teh Donald - to make them look as representing the opponent. As Assange is pointing out. She got what she wanted, the stupid turd.
Click to expand...

Is this satire? If not how would this stand out from the usual politics involved in running for office? I don't see this as immoral or stupid: you try to focus public discussion on the most negative aspects of the opponent party. And indeed her opponent for the election was....

Are you suggesting that Hillary's focus on Trump helped him obtain the Republican nomination? If so I would be curious as to the evidence for this.
 
Bob001 said:
Ex-DNC chair Donna Brazile describes how Clinton seized control of the Democratic party long before the primaries:

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...e949da-c000-11e7-97d9-bdab5a0ab381_story.html
Click to expand...

Nope.

Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to violate the DNC's obligation of impartiality and neutrality through the Nominating process. All activities performed under this agreement will be focused exclusively on preparations for the General Election and not the Democratic Primary. Further we understand you may enter into similar agreements with other candidates.
Click to expand...
 
Stacko said:
<snip>

Nope.

Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to violate the DNC's obligation of impartiality and neutrality through the Nominating process. All activities performed under this agreement will be focused exclusively on preparations for the General Election and not the Democratic Primary. Further we understand you may enter into similar agreements with other candidates.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


I'm thinking that this little excerpt isn't going to be getting a lot of airtime or other exposure by certain media outlets.
 
Last edited:
IxHGk5Y.jpg


K5beNqX.jpg
 
Giordano said:
Is this satire? If not how would this stand out from the usual politics involved in running for office? I don't see this as immoral or stupid: you try to focus public discussion on the most negative aspects of the opponent party. And indeed her opponent for the election was....

Are you suggesting that Hillary's focus on Trump helped him obtain the Republican nomination? If so I would be curious as to the evidence for this.
Click to expand...


It's in the leaked emails referenced by Assange in my link. The campaign used their influence with the media to deliver Trump some of the huge amount of free bad publicity on which he rode. The stupidity is not in the attempt to shine bad light on opponents, but in her gross misinterpretation of the effects, and of her own standing. As to "immoral" ... we shouldn't talk about morality in connection to Killary.
 
PhantomWolf said:
That's it, Hillary should be impeached and never allowed to stand for public office again!

Now let's concentrate on the same for Trump!
Click to expand...


It isn't even cute how thin-skinned you lot are about the continuation of talking about Killary. It's outright revealing. No, the world will not stop for many years to discuss the events leading up to the guy you are so conditioned to hate becoming the legitimately elected "leader of the free world", if you are into that kind of terminology. No blank slate for you.
 
Childlike Empress said:
It isn't even cute how thin-skinned you lot are about the continuation of talking about Killary. It's outright revealing. No, the world will not stop for many years to discuss the events leading up to the guy you are so conditioned to hate becoming the legitimately elected "leader of the free world", if you are into that kind of terminology. No blank slate for you.
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with being thin skinned, it has to do with this being a pointless distraction. Why is there any reason to keep bringing up a has been politician that has quit politics after losing to a idiot like Trump? I mean seriously, what is the point in it? I don't recall people still bringing up McCain or Kerry or Romney nearly a year after their loses, heck even Gore had been allowed to toddle off into the sunset by now, and that was a very controversial Election.

Hillary is done, she lost, she's quit politics, it's over, you're beating a dead horse. Stop wasting your time and get involved in something that is actually important.
 
PhantomWolf said:
It has nothing to do with being thin skinned, it has to do with this being a pointless distraction. Why is there any reason to keep bringing up a has been politician that has quit politics after losing to a idiot like Trump? I mean seriously, what is the point in it? I don't recall people still bringing up McCain or Kerry or Romney nearly a year after their loses, heck even Gore had been allowed to toddle off into the sunset by now, and that was a very controversial Election.

Hillary is done, she lost, she's quit politics, it's over, you're beating a dead horse. Stop wasting your time and get involved in something that is actually important.
Click to expand...


Yeah, Gore, that's decades ago now, and you have more than enough Trump threads to express your hate.

Just let us with a longer attention span work to feature the long but straight way to locking her up in a Siberian labour camp. Together with her shills. There she can finally bee queen. ;):cool:
 
Last edited:
Giordano said:
Is this satire? If not how would this stand out from the usual politics involved in running for office? I don't see this as immoral or stupid: you try to focus public discussion on the most negative aspects of the opponent party. And indeed her opponent for the election was....

Are you suggesting that Hillary's focus on Trump helped him obtain the Republican nomination? If so I would be curious as to the evidence for this.
Click to expand...

Twas more Hillary saying "oh don't throw me into the Trump patch"
 
PhantomWolf said:
It has nothing to do with being thin skinned, it has to do with this being a pointless distraction. Why is there any reason to keep bringing up a has been politician that has quit politics after losing to a idiot like Trump? I mean seriously, what is the point in it?
Click to expand...

I will stipulate that the main motivation for Trump to emphasize it now is distraction.

But to be fair, are there not many preaching that the whole “Russia Thing” has the higher goal of shining a light on all forms of foreign involvement in US elections? For all parties involved?

As such, should we not also pay attention to Democratic wrongdoing as well as Republican? If not wearing partisan blinders, that is.
 
Fast Eddie B said:
I will stipulate that the main motivation for Trump to emphasize it now is distraction.
But to be fair, are there not many preaching that the whole “Russia Thing” has the higher goal of shining a light on all forms of foreign involvement in US elections? For all parties involved?

As such, should we not also pay attention to Democratic wrongdoing as well as Republican? If not wearing partisan blinders, that is.
Click to expand...

You're giving him too much credit.
 
WilliamSeger said:
Yeah, two lame, recycled Hillary pseudo-scandals in two weeks -- very distracting for people who desperately want to be distracted.
Click to expand...

Elizabeth Warren admitting that the 2016 primary was rigged a few days ago is a "recycled" pseudo-scandal??

'k.
 
The Big Dog said:
Elizabeth Warren admitting that the 2016 primary was rigged a few days ago is a "recycled" pseudo-scandal??

'k.
Click to expand...


Better check under your bed tonight. Hillary might be under there.


And check the smoke detector. The LED safety light might have been replaced by a webcam from one of Hill's Shills™.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom