Cont: JFK Conspiracy Theories V: Five for Fighting

Status
Not open for further replies.
MicahJava said:
Showing an irrefutable problem with the official JFK story to lone nutters:
Click to expand...

More like an example of you using logical fallacies to 'buttress' your argument.

Show us the next scene, where your arguments get set on fire, blown up, and you scurry off through a hole in the roof.

To go back to work no doubt. ;)

Hank
 
Last edited:
BStrong said:
Historical origin of the CTist mindset:



MJ is either the Black Knight or the invisible horses, take your pick
Click to expand...

MicahJava can't be the Black Knight, because unlike the Black Knight, he never offers to call it a draw.

Like CTs everywhere, when defeated, he changes the subject, then waits a while to do a fringe reset and bring up anew the issue he just lost his arms and legs over.

Hank
 
Last edited:
MicahJava said:
I already explained how that could happen acoustically. Supersonic ammunition with a noise-suppressed rifle shot can confuse where witnesses will determine the origin of the noise.
Click to expand...
Now you just need evidence of that rifle, that ammunition and that shooter. As you've been told before.

Or are you "going to work" again? Hilarious!
 
Last edited:
HSienzant said:
MicahJava,

Have you figured out what incisions in the scalp in the coronal plane mean yet?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12039049&postcount=2002

Hank
Click to expand...

Is this how desperate you've gotten? Linking to you plugging your ears as if I have to answer that? You do know that I have cited common medical sources for everything I say about how to remove a human brain. And I found that neuroscientist who agrees with my arguments about that exactly.
 
MicahJava said:
Is this how desperate you've gotten? Linking to you plugging your ears as if I have to answer that? You do know that I have cited common medical sources for everything I say about how to remove a human brain. And I found that neuroscientist who agrees with my arguments about that exactly.
Click to expand...

Answer the questions asked. Otherwise, you're still losing by "going to work".
 
MicahJava said:
Is this how desperate you've gotten? Linking to you plugging your ears as if I have to answer that?
Click to expand...

Asking you to explain yourself is somehow me plugging my ears now? No, it's just you thinking the best defense is a good offense. So you explain nothing and move on to claiming I'm somehow asking improper questions.


MicahJava said:
You do know that I have cited common medical sources for everything I say about how to remove a human brain.
Click to expand...

"A" brain. None of which deals with the particular circumstances of the removal of JFK's brain, and what the autopsists said they found and what they did. You ignore all that, and pretend those particular circumstances -- that reminds me, did you ever figure out what 'comminuted fractures' were? -- didn't exist.

So now you're going to ignore the coronal plane incisions and the comminuted fractures part of JFK's autopsy when pretending there was only a five inch hole through which to remove the brain? Is that right?


MicahJava said:
And I found that neuroscientist who agrees with my arguments about that exactly.
Click to expand...

Was that neuroscientist at JFK's autopsy and did he assist in the autopsy in any fashion? Why quote someone who wasn't there while ignoring the procedures and findings recorded in the autopsy report by those who were there?

Here's the points you're ignoring still:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12039049&postcount=2002

As I pointed out therein, you have no medical expertise, and your fumbling around trying to explain your arguments by sourcing your own opinion is laughably worthless: You and which forensic pathologists say that? Oh, it's just you.

Hank
 
Last edited:
HSienzant said:
Asking you to explain yourself is somehow me plugging my ears now? No, it's just you thinking the best defense is a good offense. So you explain nothing and move on to claiming I'm somehow asking improper questions.




"A" brain. None of which deals with the particular circumstances of the removal of JFK's brain, and what the autopsists said they found and what they did. You ignore all that, and pretend those particular circumstances -- that reminds me, did you ever figure out what 'comminuted fractures' were? -- didn't exist.

So now you're going to ignore the coronal plane incisions and the comminuted fractures part of JFK's autopsy when pretending there was only a five inch hole through which to remove the brain? Is that right?




Was that neuroscientist at JFK's autopsy and did he assist in the autopsy in any fashion? Why quote someone who wasn't there while ignoring the procedures and findings recorded in the autopsy report by those who were there?

Hank
Click to expand...

Rhetorical questions, no doubt.
 
bknight said:
Rhetorical questions, no doubt.
Click to expand...

Not in the least. I'd really love to see his answers.

The problem is he has none.

He ignores all the inconvenient facts and all the inconvenient rebuttals and all the inconvenient questions he cannot answer.

Hank
 
HSienzant said:
MicahJava can't be the Black Knight, because unlike the Black Knight, he never offers to call it a draw.

Like CTs everywhere, when defeated, he changes the subject, then waits a while to do a fringe reset and bring up anew the issue he just lost his arms and legs over.

Hank
Click to expand...

It will be hard for MJ to top the ventriloquist sound suppressor in the ridiculous claim Hall of Shame, but I'm certain he's up to the challenge.
 
MicahJava said:
Why do you LNers pretend to not understand that the HSCA interpretation of the skull photographs is physically impossible? That's a whole brain that they said somehow fit through a five-inch skull cavity. The only way that could be the true interpretation of the photographs is if they placed a previously-separated portion of the skull back, but that contradicts all witness statements on the photographing of the skull.
Click to expand...
Dunno. Why do CTers make up crap? explain me that?
 
HSienzant said:
Five inches apart when the wound was first examined. Not when the brain was removed.




No, you want us to think the HSCA wants us to think that. I asked you to cite for that claim multiple times in the past. You never have.

There's a reason. They never said it. You're guilty of making stuff up.

Look, another strawman!

Hank
Click to expand...

What do you think I'm getting wrong here? Do you think the skull photographs were taken with previously-removed skull fragments placed back?
 
HSienzant said:
And we're still waiting for you to elaborate on your defense of Mark Lane. I asked you for that before you went back to work here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12036824&postcount=1948

I even gave an example of one of Mark Lane's deceptive treatments of an issue.

Your response: crickets chirping.

Hank
Click to expand...

For one, any explination of the jacket and shirt bunching issue is timeless. It shows that the back wound was lower than the throat wound.
 
MicahJava said:
What do you think I'm getting wrong here? Do you think the skull photographs were taken with previously-removed skull fragments placed back?
Click to expand...

I think we can all see what you're getting wrong here. You're assuming that parts of the skull can only exist in one or other of two possible conditions: rigidly fixed in place, or completely removed.

Dave
 
MicahJava said:
For one, any explination of the jacket and shirt bunching issue is timeless. It shows that the back wound was lower than the throat wound.
Click to expand...

I'm having trouble relating that reply to the post it was replying to. Is there a connection, or are you just posting stuff at random the moment it pops into your head?

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
I think we can all see what you're getting wrong here. You're assuming that parts of the skull can only exist in one or other of two possible conditions: rigidly fixed in place, or completely removed.

Dave
Click to expand...

How could I forget Anatomy 101?

IcQNIR5.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom