Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
PhantomWolf said:
Your reading comprehension seems to be lacking. Perhaps you need to look up why authors include things in quotation marks, and then actually read the article you keep going on about. It doesn't say what you think it does.
Click to expand...

Hmmmm, lets see, they are typically use when "quoting" someone, but here there is no reference to a person being quoted.... wait a tick!

They are also used to set off idioms and the like, such as "home brew" server! Say, you and I are a hell of a team, you keep throwing softballs and I keep blasting them out of the park!
 
The Big Dog said:
Hmmmm, lets see, they are typically use when "quoting" someone, but here there is no reference to a person being quoted.... wait a tick!

They are also used to set off idioms and the like, such as "home brew" server! Say, you and I are a hell of a team, you keep throwing softballs and I keep blasting them out of the park! wiffing and perpetually striking out.
Click to expand...


The Alpha Wolf is here to fix that for you.
 
plague311 said:
The big dog should read up on SSL certs and how that plays into server management. Might not hurt to brush up on the role of a physical firewall, which apparently she has as well.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Reads up on ssl certs and firewalls and all sorts of nifty technical stuff!

Say, plaque311, can you tell us what that has to do with compliance with foia/investigation/subpoenas?

Because the last time someone asked a technical question, I answered it, yet "curiously" no one ever, you know, explained the significance of the technical details they were asking about. It almost seemed like a blatant diversion into meaningless technical ********. Therefore:

I cede the floor to you to regale the assembled body with just how all of that fits together.

Excited.
 
Argumemnon said:
For someone who's done, for realz this time, she sure does gets the Republicans to spend a lot of ink on her.
Click to expand...

Say, you know you don't have to "print" out the internet, right.

Now if you want to talk about a waste of *********** ink, you might want to take a gander at a little book called It was my turn, it's not fair, people are stupid it wasn't my fault Russia/comey/Misogyny! What Happened.
 
The Big Dog said:
Say, you know you don't have to "print" out the internet, right.
Click to expand...

Say, you know that ink can be used for manuscripts as well, right?

Gee, dodging points is fun!

Now if you want to talk about a waste of *********** ink, you might want to take a gander at a little book called It was my turn, it's not fair, people are stupid it wasn't my fault Russia/comey/Misogyny! What Happened.
Click to expand...

Should Hillary simply vanished from the surface of the planet? She's done, politically. So why do you keep talking about her? Who gives a **** about her book?
 
Argumemnon said:
Say, you know that ink can be used for manuscripts as well, right?

Gee, dodging points is fun!

Should Hillary simply vanished from the surface of the planet? She's done, politically. So why do you keep talking about her? Who gives a **** about her book?
Click to expand...

Golly, I guess it sure can!

Heck of heck of a point! Folks we missed the fact that "manuscripts" can be "printed" using "ink."

I want to apologize for missing that "excellent" "point" about "manuscripts."

I also agree: who gives a **** about Hillary's awful, awful book?

Solid points all around from you.

:thumbsup::D:thumbsup:
 
The Big Dog said:
I also agree: who gives a **** about Hillary's awful, awful book?
Click to expand...
A double awful. Is that sort of like two thumbs down from Siskel and Ebert?

So that readers know how much weight to assign to your critique... Have you actually read it? Or just excerpts floating around the right wing echo chamber?
 
The Big Dog said:
Golly, I guess it sure can!

Heck of heck of a point! Folks we missed the fact that "manuscripts" can be "printed" using "ink."

I want to apologize for missing that "excellent" "point" about "manuscripts."
Click to expand...

Gee, it really is fun, since you continue to deliberately miss the actual point. First of all, I'm sure plenty of conservative paper publications spent ink on her since the elections; and second, as you know full well I was mainly refering to virtual ink i.e. blogs and forums and such. Hell, even Youtube videos.

As I said above, you know that. You just used the presence of the word "ink" as an excuse to dodge the point. Belz...'s Third Law of Diversions , indeed.

It'd be nice if you could post honestly once in a while.
 
Argumemnon said:
Gee, it really is fun, since you continue to deliberately miss the actual point. First of all, I'm sure plenty of conservative paper publications spent ink on her since the elections; and second, as you know full well I was mainly refering to virtual ink i.e. blogs and forums and such. Hell, even Youtube videos.

As I said above, you know that. You just used the presence of the word "ink" as an excuse to dodge the point. Belz...'s Third Law of Diversions , indeed.

It'd be nice if you could post honestly once in a while.
Click to expand...

Weird, I just fulsomely praised your now virtual point that you are "sure" of.

Let it ring throughout the internet: I fully agree with Argumemnon's point about his being sure that people spilled ink and virtual ink on Hillary's new awful, awful book, which I have skimmed at the library the last two weekends and laughed laughed and laughed at its complete lack of self awareness.

I started with the chapter called "“Those Damn Emails." Oh the mirth!
 
The Big Dog said:
Let it ring throughout the internet: I fully agree with Argumemnon's point about his being sure that people spilled ink and virtual ink on Hillary's new awful, awful book, which I have skimmed at the library the last two weekends and laughed laughed and laughed at its complete lack of self awareness.
Click to expand...

Don't you think that Hillary being out of any future political race makes spending all that real and virtual ink and breath kind of pointless?

I mean, speaking of self-awareness.
 
Argumemnon said:
Don't you think that Hillary being out of any future political race makes spending all that real and virtual ink and breath kind of pointless?

I mean, speaking of self-awareness.
Click to expand...

Sounds like victim blaming, I and the "conservative media" did not make her write an awful book and go on a hilariously lame book tour where she charged people to stand in line at Costco to get her awful book.
 
The Big Dog said:
Sounds like victim blaming
Click to expand...

Are conservatives now poor victims of Hillary and her awful, awful book?

I and the "conservative media" did not make her write an awful book and go on a hilariously lame book tour where she charged people to stand in line at Costco to get her awful book.
Click to expand...

No but that doesn't explain why you waste so much time on someone who is now irrelevant.
 
Argumemnon said:
Are conservatives now poor victims of Hillary and her awful, awful book?



No but that doesn't explain why you waste so much time on someone who is now irrelevant.
Click to expand...

Say, you know what would be awesome? A gif of an irony meter blowing up that I could place right in this message box, as an appreciation.... nay an HOMAGE to your tireless, tireless efforts to tell us how we are wasting our time writing about someone "who is now irrelevant."

Really blows the wind under my, hell, all of our skirts to have someone so tirelessly, repetitively posting about it.

A tip of the hat and a jaunty:

WELL DONE SIR!

to you.
 
The Big Dog said:
Say, you know what would be awesome? A gif of an irony meter blowing up that I could place right in this message box, as an appreciation.... nay an HOMAGE to your tireless, tireless efforts to tell us how we are wasting our time writing about someone "who is now irrelevant."
Click to expand...

How is it ironic to tell you that you're being hypocritical? Hillary is done but I just can't stop talking about her!

You're a Clinton addict!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom