Merged A God of Love / The Living God

[Johanabrahams]

Well you have to see it from our perspective.

It seems like your perspective.

As far far as we know, your former wife had to be protected from you as did your kid/s (one, maybe two, you're kind of fuzzy on that?) Your entire township eject you and sought the protection of the law due to your violence, as is recorded in court records as you agree.

Yep. According to you I am a very "violent" man. Everybody is just in fear because of my terrible "violence"

And you made contact with Robertson. And you came back with "violence". That is no fact. Can you please tell us about this "violence" and what it consists off. We are waiting expectantly on your facts.

You believe in a god which you are unable to provide the slightest evidence for.

I am His evidence.

You claim variously to be that god, or the wife of that god, or the son of that god, or all of our mothers, or who knows what.

Oh! You have seen. So why are you still fumbling?

At this point, it's hard to tell what your claims might be.

I am the evidence. And here is some more.

https://web.facebook.com/photo.php?...35366343.36890.100002775263058&type=3&theater

My son. Sitting with his very violent Mother. Seemingly without fear. Amazing!

And so I return to my question. Can you demonstrate that any god of any description actually exists? So far, the answer is no, you cannot.

That is your answer.

 

[Johanabrahams]

God fail

"Sorry, this content isn't available at the moment
The link you followed may have expired, or the Page may only be visible to an audience that you aren't in."

In the other one I just see a drunk guy and his drunk friend.

Look for the one with his Mother in it.

 

[abaddon]

Wrong. They asked me not to identify individuals for fear of your violence.

And what "violence" is that?

Tough. I know what you actually did, but the mods here have determined that it is not appropriate material for discussion. Believe it or not, you have not that power here, to compel anything. Frankly, you should abandon this line of enquiry. The mods have deemed it off limits for this site. I am not willing to discuss this any further.

Bollocks. I have made no "pact with evil". That is entirely in your lurid imagination.

To do things behind somebody's back which you agreed not to speak about and then come here and say how bad it was without facts. Making my name bad without facts is evil.

You spoke behind my back and got "evidence" behind my back. And you were silenced to say nothing. You made a "pact with evil".

Wrong. Again. And again, I am not going to buy a ban just for your glory. The mods have determined that this is not an allowable topic, so please drop it.

Load of rubbish.

Nope. You said so yourself.

I did? Where exactly was that?

Yes. I know what you did. It wasn't godly.

And what was that?

Once again, The mod team have determined this to be not allowed. Please stop, cease, desist.

And what do you do with true accusers?

Where are they?

All around you. Can you stop with this nonsense now?

Meaningless bible-babble.

Nope.

Yep, babble.

It is a matter of record. I made no agreement with anyone in this matter.

You said so yourself.

The only agreement I made was to respect others privacy. But you don't like that.

How does it feel? Satisfying. Pointing out internet cranks and their abject nonsense is not only justified, I consider it a moral imperative.

So go ahead.

No soup for you. You think I would fall for that? Really?

Is it? Then why are you running away from demonstrating that any god exists? Let alone your borked version of god.

You looking at him.

No, I am looking at a wodge of text and that's it.

Really? Why are you so scared at the prospect that any god exists let alone your messed up version? Why can't you answer that?

I exist.

Prove it. How do I know you are not a bot?

No, he didn't

Says you.

Says he.

Sorry, barfing random gigle quotes means nothing.

Do you not understand it or do you not want to understand what I am saying?

Well that's easy. Your gibberish claims are gibberish. You are god? Really? You are everyone's mother? Really?

Wow. Abject racism. No, your former pastors, neighbours and family have rejected you and you plainly cannot handle it.

Rejected me for what? And how do you see that I can not handle it?

Seriously? Start with the court orders you are so proud of.

So how about you demonstrate that any god exists, let alone your peculiar god? You seem to be avoiding that.

As I said. You re looking at Him.

Except that I'm not. I am not looking at you, nor god, nor anything of that style of kidney. I am looking at text. On a screen. With a computer.

 

[Johanabrahams]

Still broken. You really are unable to figure out this internet stuff. Which is odd, because you claim "god" as your guide. So god can't figure out the internet either.

Actually what we need to look at is you knowing what is wrong. And you not telling me. When somebody needs help in something that you know about you should help him. Not to help him but to just enjoy him fumbling is selfish. That is bad.

So do you know what is wrong and how to correct it or don't you?

Wow. That's incoherent.

So what is "incoherent" there with me and my son sitting together right there in the eyes of the whole world. Just waiting for anyone that wants to comment on it.

So how about you provide evidence for any god at all? You keep avoiding this question. Why? Don't you have any?

Look at the difference.

My evidence right there on Facebook for everyone to see. And yours together with my wife and the "white Robertson" just like ghosts.

Now what is going to be fun is me linking this post with those comments there on Facebook. So take a look there again. Let us see what they think. Maybe they will even come here and speak to you because they do not seem to be controlled by "fear" like your friends in Robertson. Maybe you should make better friends.

-----------------------------------------------

Here is the link.

https://web.facebook.com/photo.php?...5366343.36890.100002775263058&type=3&theater#

And you will see there that I told them about you and your "ghosts" and how my son Zola is an example to you and your "ghosts". Now you should tell your "ghosts" also that they have an example now of the correct way of giving evidence. They should stop their "back speaking" which is slandering and come into the open and thus will be restored from their "ghostly" status.

 

[Belz...]

The spirit is the area where feelings/spirits/angels have contact with the body.

No, feelings are chemical. They make contact because they're part of it. I'm asking you what part of this "spirit" of yours operates outside of biology.

There you perseive feelings. Some call it your heart because it appears to be in the center of your body. Approximately where your heart is situated. That is far from your brain.

When I hit you on the hand, you feel pain in the hand, don't you? Yeah, but it's the brain doing the feeling. Same thing with the impression that the heart is doing any feeling. We've known this for quite a while now.

Nope I said I have Godly thoughts now.

They seem pretty faillible for godly thoughts.

In your judgment yes.

In the judgment of everything humans know for a fact.

Why not?

Because I have no obligation to keep your secrets. If you make claims, support them with facts open for all to see.

 

[abaddon]

Well you have to see it from our perspective.

It seems like your perspective.

It is, and justifiably so.

As far far as we know, your former wife had to be protected from you as did your kid/s (one, maybe two, you're kind of fuzzy on that?) Your entire township eject you and sought the protection of the law due to your violence, as is recorded in court records as you agree.

Yep. According to you I am a very "violent" man. Everybody is just in fear because of my terrible "violence"
And you made contact with Robertson. And you came back with "violence". That is no fact. Can you please tell us about this "violence" and what it consists off. We are waiting expectantly on your facts.

I made contact with Robertson in order to verify the facts. It's what skeptics do. And it makes you uncomfortable. I can understand why.

You believe in a god which you are unable to provide the slightest evidence for.

I am His evidence.

Make up your mind. Are you god? Or everyone's mother and the wife of god?

You claim variously to be that god, or the wife of that god, or the son of that god, or all of our mothers, or who knows what.

Oh! You have seen. So why are you still fumbling?

I have seen you fumbling with malformed ideas. That's it.

At this point, it's hard to tell what your claims might be.

I am the evidence. And here is some more.

https://web.facebook.com/photo.php?...35366343.36890.100002775263058&type=3&theater

Your evidence is a broken link to nothing. How apropos.

My son. Sitting with his very violent Mother. Seemingly without fear. Amazing!

Not really, the link provided goes nowhere.

And so I return to my question. Can you demonstrate that any god of any description actually exists? So far, the answer is no, you cannot.

That is your answer.

Then why should anyone believe in any god?

 

[Johanabrahams]

And here you are now with no evidence that any god exists.

It is amusing that you refuse to defend the existence of your deity of choice, let alone any of the other thousands of claimed deities.

Why is that?

Well the evidence of the "ghost" are there so why is it so difficult to see the existence of God which is reality.

Evil vs Good.

Ghosts vs God.

 

[Belz...]

Well the evidence of the "ghost" are there

Ah, great. So can you present what you consider to be the single most convincing piece of evidence for the "ghost"?

 

[kali1137]

My evidence right there on Facebook for everyone to see. And yours together with my wife and the "white Robertson" just like ghosts.

Just so I have this clear in my head...............links to random facebook posts is proof that god not only exists but is you? Going by the rules and burden of proof set down by you, I shall now link to a random person on facebook to declare that I am Cleopatra.

 

[Johanabrahams]

Yet have produced nothing. Why have you produced nothing?

Wrong. I produced Zola and you produced ghosts.

Slavery, you god loves it enough to write it in your bible. Including instructions as to how to perform it. Sure, you will claim that the NT obviated that but it doesn't. The NT endorses it. But this is no surprise.

Actually He corrects it. And now He is busy with Internet slavery. What do you say about that?

You think the "blicks" are subhuman and feel you can happily exploit them. You have stated so. Your words, not mine.

So who are the "blicks"? Your ghosts again?

Evidence? Do you believe in the Jerusalem zombie apocalypse as the bible states?

So tell me about it.

Jesus, Jesus, Jesus. Turns out you are flat out wrong. Jesus. As far as I am concerned, Jesus can go take an unlikely anatomical excursion for all I care.

Just to make the point clear. Jesus. Jesus. Jesus. Jesus. Jesus. Jesus. Jesus. Jesus.

Oh! You can say Jesus. But why do you say it so many times? Still on your "nerves"?

I cannot help that you are unable to identify outright mockery.

So what is the reason for "mockery"?

Yup. And I will say it again. Jesus was a total dick. And an utter moron. Your bible tells us that.

Nope the Bible does not say it. You say it.

Really? Then what do you want? Even your co-religionists reject your baloney. What do you expect from atheists?

Well they but "religionists".

No, you know nothing.

Nope. I do. Just take some time to get it through. Heavy stuff this. Not everybody can understand quickly.

Because your deity of choice endorses slavery, genocide, infanticide, rape, human sacrifice and all such horrors. By defending such abject crap you also condone such baloney.

Actually He corrects all those. And now present day slavery. Take a look there at "My Workplace" and of course God's forum.
http://forums.delphiforums.com/king

 

[halleyscomet]

Well the evidence of the "ghost" are there so why is it so difficult to see the existence of God which is reality.

Evil vs Good.

Ghosts vs God.

That presumes ghosts to be evil, which is an absurd assertion to make in the absence of evidence. Many cultures have accounts of ghosts with benign or even benevolent intentions towards the living. These are no less authoritative than your bald assertions about the nature of the supernatural.

I direct you to The "Hungry Ghosts" episode of the Uncanny Japan podcast. It touches on just a few of the types of Gaki in Japanese folklore and mythology. The position of the Gaki on the Wheel of Life is not a pleasant one, yet it is still a point where a soul has opportunities to once again ascend. Your simplistic view of mythology would dismiss all Gaki as evil in and of themselves.

 

[halleyscomet]

Here is the link.

https://web.facebook.com/photo.php?...5366343.36890.100002775263058&type=3&theater#

And you will see there that I told them about you and your "ghosts" and how my son Zola is an example to you and your "ghosts". Now you should tell your "ghosts" also that they have an example now of the correct way of giving evidence. They should stop their "back speaking" which is slandering and come into the open and thus will be restored from their "ghostly" status.

Clicking the link produces this:

Sorry, this content isn't available right now
The link you followed may have expired, or the page may only be visible to an audience you're not in.

There's a theological metaphor in there somewhere, but all I can come up with at the moment is, "Johanabrahams gets a 404 error when he tries to prove his claims."

 

[Johanabrahams]

Yet he killed them anyway. Jesus was a dick.

Nope. It was not about the killing of the pigs. It was about handling evil.

Yet he sole the pigs from their herder, killing the pigs for no reason and rendering the herder unemployed and unemployable. How pleasant. Jesus was a total dick.

Nope. There was a reason. You just do not understand it.

Or he could have simply made the out of season fig tree bloom. Jesus was a dick.

It was not about the fig tree. I spoke on this already.

Yet all those people think that your scurrilous aspresions upon Jesus are sufficient to chuck you right out. Why?

These links are about true freedom in Internet forums. Read again.

Please address my query. Demonstrate that any deity exists. Why are you unable to do that?

I am busy.

 

[halleyscomet]

Nope. It was not about the killing of the pigs. It was about handling evil.

By murdering animals and destroying the property of an innocent bystander.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r65C367hCVI

As for the fig tree, did the person who OWNED the fig tree really deserve to have his tree destroyed so some wandering, homeless rabbi could make a theological point?

 

[Johanabrahams]

And there you go again, tossing the bible under the proverbial bus. Bacon is biblically verboten.

Yep. But the laws changed. Since we became gods we have no laws. We make them now.

How about you address my question? Can you demonstrate that any god exists?

Yep. We make the laws now for you.

I keep asking, and you keep dodging.

Nope. You just do not see. Some are faster and some slower. Just keep on.

If you could then you would have done so already. It seems clear that you cannot, since this is the ninth time of asking and so far, you have nothing to offer, it is clear that, frankly, you have nothing.

Nope. It is you that do not see. Stick to it. It creates perseverance.

I do not care which deity you choose. Yours, someone else's, whatever. Demonstrate that even one of the thousands of claimed deities actually exists.

And patience.

 

[Johanabrahams]

Then why do you make empty claims?

They are not empty. I said they are empty "to you".

You have conceded that you cannot provide any evidence for any god, or jesus or much of anything.

Nope. I said that because of me He is.

In actual fact, you refuse to even make the attempt.

Not necessary. Here I am.

All you are left with is the trivial argument that it must be so because you say it is so. That is a stupid position for anyone to take.

Nope. You do not see. I said that it must be so because "here I am".

 

[Johanabrahams]

Then why do you make empty claims?

They are not empty. I said they are empty "to you".

You have conceded that you cannot provide any evidence for any god, or jesus or much of anything.

Nope. I said that because of me He is.

In actual fact, you refuse to even make the attempt.

Not necessary. Here I am.

I am that I am.

All you are left with is the trivial argument that it must be so because you say it is so. That is a stupid position for anyone to take.

Nope. You do not see. I said that it must be so because "here I am".

I am that I am.

 

[abaddon]

Yet he killed them anyway. Jesus was a dick.

Nope. It was not about the killing of the pigs. It was about handling evil.

And you, being "god" could think of no better method of dealing with "evil" than to inflict it upon innocent animals? Really?

Yet he sole the pigs from their herder, killing the pigs for no reason and rendering the herder unemployed and unemployable. How pleasant. Jesus was a total dick.

Nope. There was a reason. You just do not understand it.

Nope. Bible god is a dick by any reasonable measure. You simply don't like that.

Or he could have simply made the out of season fig tree bloom. Jesus was a dick.

It was not about the fig tree. I spoke on this already.

The fig tree is dead. I suspect it might disagree. Besides, the message clearly is "I am god therefore irrational hissy fits are my right"

Yet all those people think that your scurrilous aspresions upon Jesus are sufficient to chuck you right out. Why?

These links are about true freedom in Internet forums. Read again.

Why should I? It was truly awful at the first go around.

Please address my query. Demonstrate that any deity exists. Why are you unable to do that?

I am busy.

Wow. So you are unable to demonstrate any god. Glad you admitted it. Progress of a sort, I guess.

Now move along. Why exactly should I or anyone else believe in this god that you admit you cannot demonstrate?

 

[halleyscomet]

Not necessary. Here I am.

Nope. You do not see. I said that it must be so because "here I am".

Congratulations. You can prove your own existence. So what? You're no more a god than anyone else here. I'd argue that your lack of demonstrable accomplishments would make you LESS of a deity than say, Linus Torvalds or Bill Bixby. If you're a "god" you're something of a sad, dollar store deity. We all know the kinds of things you find at the dollar store:

 

[Johanabrahams]

Where is any evidence for that wild claim? You have none.

Zola vs ghosts.

I suspect you have fallen for the creationist bollocks.

Nope. I do not fall for anything.

And you provided exactly zero evidence of anything. So you have no evidence. If you did then you would have presented it, but you didn't. Why not? Where is your deity of choice? You seem unable to say.

I am that I am.