Merged General Holocaust denial discussion Part IV

[smartcooky]

Saggy you already brought this up before - several times -

Yeah, but he has posted such a stunning array of utter bollocks in the mean time, that he has probably forgotten, or hopes that we have!

 

[Border Reiver]

Who he?

Some guy who attaches the handles to knives, daggers and swords.

 

[LemmyCaution]

Yeah, but he has posted such a stunning array of utter bollocks in the mean time, that he has probably forgotten, or hopes that we have!

He's been very busy looking for that pesky link to the Zisblatt video.

 

[Saggy]

Recall that we have a standing challenge for the hoaxers - to post any example, a photo would be nice, of physical evidence of the holohoax.

Thus far, nada. Don't they teach you anything in hasbara school but insults and idiocy?

I'll even try to help you out, I think I can find a photo of some very incriminating shoes.

 

[zooterkin]

Recall that we have a standing challenge for the hoaxers - to post any example, a photo would be nice, of physical evidence of the holohoax.

There is only one 'hoax', which is the big lie you're attempting to promulgate. The burden of proof is on you. You're probably too young and remote, but there are people on this forum whose relatives lived through the war and post-war clean-up; possibly even one or two who did themselves.

 

[Saggy]

There is only one 'hoax', which is the big lie you're attempting to promulgate. The burden of proof is on you. You're probably too young and remote, but there are people on this forum whose relatives lived through the war and post-war clean-up; possibly even one or two who did themselves.

I can give you an example of physical proof of the the hoax, no problem, here it is ...

https://i.imgur.com/v4eaFPP.jpg?1

Now, let's see you give one instance of physical proof of the 'holocaust'. It cannot be done, because there is no physical evidence of an event that never happened. Just Jewish lies.

Edited by Loss Leader: 

Edited to change image to URL. Do not repost the same images multiple times. Use the [IMGW=x] tag for large images, where x equals the size of the picture (400 works well).

 

[LemmyCaution]

How many times, O Lord, how many times?

There's a lot more than photos, as you've been schooled repeatedly, but if it's photos you want to see again, here you go:
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2009/03/photographic-documentation-of-nazi.html
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/10/mass-graves-and-dead-bodies.html
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.de/2016/04/photographic-evidence-of-exhumed.html
http://kehilalinks.jewishgen.org/lodz/gfhphoto.htm
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=25822&p=521792#p521792
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.de/2008/10/photographic-evidence-of-mass-shootings_10.html
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=24383
http://sobibor.info.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Report-by-Y.Haimi-Autumn-2013.pdf
http://blogs.staffs.ac.uk/archaeolo...urvey-at-treblinka-ii-the-extermination-camp/

IIRC all this material has been linked to and/or posted in one of our 4 threads previously.

 

[LemmyCaution]

I can give you an example of physical proof of the the hoax, no problem, here it is ...

debunked repeatedly - and you refuse to deal with the posts showing your attempted chicanery on this, it gets boring

Just Jewish lies.

This reminds me that you still haven't answered the question I asked you here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11998072&postcount=74. Which of the sources are (a) pathological, (b) degenerate, (c) preposterous, (d) absurd, or (e) all of the above?

 

[Hans]

He seems to be trying, by endlessly repeating himself, to get us to throw up our hands and stop talking to him - therefore scoring some sort of victory in the 'Hitler was a good guy world', is that going to happen? No Saggy it isn't.

 

[Saggy]

He seems to be trying, by endlessly repeating himself, to get us to throw up our hands and stop talking to him ....

I'm setting you up. You know, jab, feint, jab, feint, .... jab, feint, .... then .... boom

Keep your guard up !

Of course, you drop the peek-a-boo defense and try to actually present some physical evidence. That would be entertaining.

 

[LemmyCaution]

I'm setting you up. You know, jab, feint, jab, feint, .... jab, feint, .... then .... boom

Keep your guard up !

Yeah, you wrote the same thing about Babi Yar right before falling silent when we posted a lot of evidence you couldn't handle and a critique of your claims that was over your head.

Of course, you could try to actually present some physical evidence. That would be entertaining.

Maybe you could stop ignoring that which we have presented . . . oh, whoops, sorry: that would bring an end to your little game.

Carri on.

 

[LemmyCaution]

He seems to be trying, by endlessly repeating himself . . .

More likely that's all he's got.

 

[Belz...]

Recall that we have a standing challenge for the hoaxers

Your challenge is not standing. It's been beaten to a pulp. It's no one's fault but your own if you simply ignore the evidence presented, and even admit to doing so.

 

[Hans]

I'm setting you up. You know, jab, feint, jab, feint, .... jab, feint, .... then .... boom

Keep your guard up !

Of course, you drop the peek-a-boo defense and try to actually present some physical evidence. That would be entertaining.

Taunting? My my how childlike.

No your knowledge of what you are trying to deny is so utterly inept all you can do is repeat the few things you've seen on line and are copying and pasting.

You simply ignore or dismiss without reason all evidence provided - plus with a few clicks you can find tons of evidence, which you can then deny in private.

lol

 

[Nessie]

The only hoax here, is that millions more Jewish people survived the war than historians and governments admit and they lived on, in an undisclosed location. There is no evidence at all that happened.

 

[Hans]

More likely that's all he's got.

I wasn't kidding when I said he should just number his 'arguments'. It would save time.

 

[Dash80]

I can give you an example of physical proof of the the hoax, no problem, here it is ...

https://i.imgur.com/v4eaFPP.jpg?1

Now, let's see you give one instance of physical proof of the 'holocaust'. It cannot be done, because there is no physical evidence of an event that never happened. Just Jewish lies.

That door is not original, I doubt even the DOORWAY is either.

Also, the Krema 1 morgue was adapted as a gas chamber during the period where very few Jews were present in the camp. The victims of early gassings were sick Poles and Soviet POWS. Testimony for those gassings comes from primarily Polish/German inmates and German guards.

So, how is that a Jewish lie?

Not to mention that the Nazis had been gassing people (sick and disabled) for almost two years before that, mostly in the Euthanasia centres.

Edited by Loss Leader: 

Edited quote to conform.

 

[Hellbound]

King Arthur Forum: "I've cut your arm off!"
Black Knight Saggy: "No you haven't!"
Forum: "What's that, then?!"
Saggy: "It's a flesh wound! Have at you!"

 

[Jeffk 1970]

I'm setting you up. You know, jab, feint, jab, feint, .... jab, feint, .... then .... boom

Keep your guard up !

Of course, you drop the peek-a-boo defense and try to actually present some physical evidence. That would be entertaining.

Did you just knock yourself out? Is that why you haven't posted in a while?

Saggy, why don't you present evidence of a "hoax?" We can fool around all day with you mocking witness testimonies and posting cute pictures. You basically just ignore anything we post that contradicts you. That is getting old.

I posted this thread at Skeptics back when we actually had deniers. They scuttled off in the meantime so I'll post it for you.

http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=27177

Now, I'd be happy to speak up for you at Skeptics but I need you to let me know if you want me to do that.

But, if you don't I still think the thread is valuable for you, a starting point if you will.

Now, it's simple. If you claim forgery you have to prove it, if you claim torture you have to prove it.

I look forward to your results, Saggy.

 

[Hans]

Did you just knock yourself out? Is that why you haven't posted in a while?

Saggy, why don't you present evidence of a "hoax?" We can fool around all day with you mocking witness testimonies and posting cute pictures. You basically just ignore anything we post that contradicts you. That is getting old.

I posted this thread at Skeptics back when we actually had deniers. They scuttled off in the meantime so I'll post it for you.

http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=27177

Now, I'd be happy to speak up for you at Skeptics but I need you to let me know if you want me to do that.

But, if you don't I still think the thread is valuable for you, a starting point if you will.

Now, it's simple. If you claim forgery you have to prove it, if you claim torture you have to prove it.

I look forward to your results, Saggy.

Well said but I don't think Saggy is really here to try and present rational arguments, he's just flouncing about awhile pretending he is accomplishing something.