Merged General Holocaust denial discussion Part IV

Dash80 said:
Are you done being childish?

http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/index-of-published-evidence-on.html?m=1
Click to expand...

Childish? Cans of Zyklon-B, a commercially insecticide available and used all over Europe, are often cited as evidence of the holohoax. You can watch the Cole vid for verification.

But, hey, if you have photos of any 'real', you know, real, evidence of the hoax, let's see it .....

I've heard there are some very incriminating piles of shoes to be seen ????
 
Saggy said:
Childish? Cans of Zyklon-B, a commercially insecticide available and used all over Europe, are often cited as evidence of the holohoax. You can watch the Cole vid for verification.

But, hey, if you have photos of any 'real', you know, real, evidence of the hoax, let's see it .....

I've heard there are some very incriminating piles of shoes to be seen ????
Click to expand...

It'd be nice if you had anything beyond arguments from incredulity.
 
Saggy said:
Childish? Cans of Zyklon-B, a commercially insecticide available and used all over Europe, are often cited as evidence of the holohoax. You can watch the Cole vid for verification.

But, hey, if you have photos of any 'real', you know, real, evidence of the hoax, let's see it .....

I've heard there are some very incriminating piles of shoes to be seen ????
Click to expand...

Would you therefore be willing to try an experiment and eat/breathe/otherwise consume some Zyklon?

Why or why not?
 
LemmyCaution said:
Which members do you claim are hasbaras? What is your proof?

Saggy said:
An excellent question. The total duplicity and lack of shame for all posters supporting the hoax, coupled with the abject stupidity of many, convinces me that all are, shall we say, hoaxers.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

So you have no evidence and no proof. Just your own opinion.

Hank
 
Last edited:
HSienzant said:
Begging the question. How do you know that?

Hank
Click to expand...

Read the thread Hank, from the Zisblatt post. Try to understand what you've read. See if that helps.

Here's who to look for ....

P3rL6Zv.jpg


Along the way see ....

gJcxLFz.jpg


IBMCGjg.jpg


A8051MD.jpg


And the kindergarten teacher who told the truth ....

c5reIXh.jpg
 
Last edited:
Saggy said:
Childish? Cans of Zyklon-B, a commercially insecticide available and used all over Europe, are often cited as evidence of the holohoax. You can watch the Cole vid for verification.

But, hey, if you have photos of any 'real', you know, real, evidence of the hoax, let's see it .....

I've heard there are some very incriminating piles of shoes to be seen ????
Click to expand...

Zyklon can and will kill humans, your heroes figured that one out. In fact they tested it on sick Poles and Soviet POWS FIRST.

But you won't address that will you, because it sort of destroys your Jewish invention nonsense. As does the Euthanasia program.
 
Saggy said:
Read the thread Hank, from the Zisblatt post. Try to understand what you've read. See if that helps.

Here's who to look for ....

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/P3rL6Zv.jpg[/qimg]

Along the way see ....

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/gJcxLFz.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/IBMCGjg.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/A8051MD.jpg[/qimg]

And the kindergarten teacher who told the truth ....

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/c5reIXh.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

*Raises hand*

Oh I know this one! Pick me!
It's because they're Jewish, isn't it?
 
HSienzant said:
So you have no evidence and no proof. Just your own opinion.

Hank
Click to expand...

There's a famous saying amoung mathematicians, that is 'you can't prove anything to a rock', which I can't attribute. But, none the less, there it is.
 
Last edited:
HSienzant said:
Begging the question. How do you know that?

Hank
Click to expand...
When Saggy writes that "All the 'eyewitnesses' are pathological and degenerate liars," he has a special definition of the word "all": for Saggy it means "a few that I've found and don't believe." Saggy has found - well, been handed by someone - also a few unreliable witnesses - memory shot after many years? - and a few outright imposters - in Saggy's world, these are "all the 'eyewitnesses." No other witnesses are to be considered . . .

By the same token, "pathological" and "degenerate" seem to refer to witnesses who mostly relate what the Germans did.

It's very odd, but that's what we have here.
 
LemmyCaution said:
When Saggy writes that "All the 'eyewitnesses' are pathological and degenerate liars," he has a special definition of the word "all":
Click to expand...

Each of the phony eyewitnesses I've discussed has been very heavily promoted by the hoax industry. I haven't even mentioned one of the most idiotic, and that's saying something, that being Elie Wiesel, and he was the first director of the USHMM and won a Nobel Peace Prize, if you can believe it.

But, rather than have a Hilter loving denier pick the phony eyewitnesses, let's let Steven Spielberg, with his collection of 50,000 testimonies, choose the best and most compelling .....

Hey, wait a minute, Spielberg has already done that, and he made an Academy Award winning mockumentary, oops, documentary movie about them titled 'The Last Days'.

To see his collection of degenerate idiots disassembled to their constituent idiocies, watch the vid by Eric Hunt,

Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big Lie
 
Saggy said:
Each of the phony eyewitnesses I've discussed has been very heavily promoted by the hoax industry. I haven't even mentioned one of the most idiotic, and that's saying something, that being Elie Wiesel, and he was the first director of the USHMM and won a Nobel Peace Prize, if you can believe it.

But, rather than have a Hilter loving denier pick the phony eyewitnesses, let's let Steven Spielberg, with his collection of 50,000 testimonies, choose the best and most compelling .....

Hey, wait a minute, Spielberg has already done that, and he made an Academy Award winning mockumentary, oops, documentary movie about them titled 'The Last Days'.

To see his collection of degenerate idiots disassembled to their constituent idiocies, watch the vid by Eric Hunt,

Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big Lie
Click to expand...

Saggy you already brought this up before - several times - repeating the same stuff that is absent of content and context is a waste of everyone's time.

I mean you're entire argument consists of about 20 posts, why not just number them and say instead: I say #3 and & #4 and this is the 42nd time!!!

That is what you are doing. So why no make it easier on you and us.
 
Saggy said:
Each of the phony eyewitnesses I've discussed has been very heavily promoted by the hoax industry. I haven't even mentioned one of the most idiotic, and that's saying something, that being Elie Wiesel, and he was the first director of the USHMM and won a Nobel Peace Prize, if you can believe it.

But, rather than have a Hilter loving denier pick the phony eyewitnesses, let's let Steven Spielberg, with his collection of 50,000 testimonies, choose the best and most compelling .....

Hey, wait a minute, Spielberg has already done that, and he made an Academy Award winning mockumentary, oops, documentary movie about them titled 'The Last Days'.

To see his collection of degenerate idiots disassembled to their constituent idiocies, watch the vid by Eric Hunt,

Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big Lie
Click to expand...

Name ONE historian who relies on Spielberg, go on.
 
Saggy said:
Don't quibble D. When 'debating' with the hasbara the idiotic lies are endless.
LemmyCaution said:
Which members do you claim are hasbaras? What is your proof?
HSienzant said:
So you have no evidence and no proof. Just your own opinion.
Saggy said:
There's a famous saying amoung mathematicians, that is 'you can't prove anything to a rock', which I can't attribute. But, none the less, there it is.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Sorry, unless you're having a conversation with a rock (and why would you do that?) you haven't proven anything. To anyone. In fact, you haven't even tried. You cited your opinion, then alluded to me being a rock. Not the best of starts. Why not take a step back, consider what you claimed, marshall your evidence, and try to prove your claim?

Hank
 
Saggy said:
. . . rather than have a Hilter loving denier pick the phony eyewitnesses, let's let Steven Spielberg, with his collection of 50,000 testimonies, choose the best and most compelling ....
Click to expand...
No, let's stick to the witnesses whose testimony historians have used to reach their conclusions. And, since you claimed "all" witnesses lie, and are degenerate, pathological, etc, what's keeping you from discussing the witnesses we say are credible? Oh, they're credible and your game is up . . . got it.

Just because a witness was taped and included in Spielberg's collection doesn't mean the witness's testimony is useful for proving the Holocaust, or even accurate. Which I've explained to you - along with how an academic conference last year sponsored a visit to the archive for discussion of how to make use of and evaluate what's in it.

P.S. - By the way, you never answered the question I asked you here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11998072&postcount=74. More dodging, eh? Come on, tell me, which are (a) pathological, (b) degenerate, (c) preposterous, (d) absurd, or (e) all of the above?
P.S.S. - Eric Hunt still repudiates his Holocaust denial.
 
Last edited:
LemmyCaution said:
No, let's stick to the witnesses whose testimony historians have used to reach their conclusions. And, since you claimed "all" witnesses lie, and are degenerate, pathological, etc, what's keeping you from discussing the witnesses we say are credible? Oh, they're credible and your game is up . . . got it.

Just because a witness was taped and included in Spielberg's collection doesn't mean the witness's testimony is useful for proving the Holocaust, or even accurate. Which I've explained to you - along with how an academic conference last year sponsored a visit to the archive for discussion of how to make use of and evaluate what's in it.

P.S. - By the way, you never answered the question I asked you here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11998072&postcount=74. More dodging, eh? Come on, tell me, which are (a) pathological, (b) degenerate, (c) preposterous, (d) absurd, or (e) all of the above?
P.S.S. - Eric Hunt still repudiates his Holocaust denial.
Click to expand...

Question: about how many Germans, who were loyal to the Hitlerite regime until it collapsed, gave testimony or left written records confirming genocide against the people of Europe?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom