Here's more reporting from the same group visiting the country, for your amusement:
What We Saw in North Korea Goes against Everything Western Media Wants Us to Believe
Oh Jesus! Some people will believe anything.
Rarely do we listen to the North Korean side. Yet it should be no surprise that they have a distinct perspective on the successive Japanese and American attacks, invasions and occupations that have defined their past century. Even when UN commissioned 'human rights' reports are prepared, it is not thought necessary to get the North Korean view, or even to visit the country.
Actually, many people spend a great deal of time listening to what North Korea says. You could try B.R Myers, for example, who reads the North Korean domestic propaganda or others who are in no doubt that what North Korea wants is to take over South Korea. People, such as Barbara Demick, also spend a lot of time talking to North Korean people to find out what it is like to live in a repressive regime which mismanages its economy in such a way that most people outside the capital are hungry and need to travel to China just to get enough to eat. And many refugees, such as Kang Chol-Hwan, have written books about what it is like to either live in the gulags there or to fall out of favour with the ruling class and have everything taken from them. Maybe
Eva Bartlett Tim Anderson could write a People's History of North Korea, rather than simply pedaling the government script given to gullible Westerners on Korean Friendship Association Tours (I don't know if that's who
she went with, but
her his reporting has the feel of something Alejandro Cao de Benos might say).
Popular western history blames North Korea for starting the Korean war (1950-53). By this story the US is said to have intervened (killing more than 4 million, according to the DPRK) to 'protect' South Korea from 'communist aggression'.
However the North Koreans themselves, and many socialist historians, point to US military planning for complete annexation of the peninsula, as spelt out by the 1949-50 head of US occupation forces, General Roberts.
Prime example of DPRK line, and supported by some "socialist historians" - presumably someone like Bruce Cumings. Of course, since this narrative has been constructed, some of the Soviet archives have been opened showing Kim Il-sung begging Stalin to greenlight his invasion of South Korea. Besides, if the US wanted to start a war with North Korea in the late forties and early fifties then it would have made no sense for President Truman's mass demobilization of the military and leaving South Korea and Japan under the supervision of a bunch of Twinkie-eating teenagers, for that was pretty much what the US Army in those countries consisted of at the time.
With two colleagues I visited the DPRK in late August. It is a beautiful, lush country with warm, friendly people. I was struck by the confidence and self-assurance of the many well educated North Koreans we met, in particular the women. That self-confidence seems to reflect the state slogan 'we envy nothing in this world', linked to an official _Juche _philosophy which stresses human creativity and self-reliance.
Fascist countries do tend to be self-confident, it is true, and North Korea is no exception. They also tend to simultaneously believe in their own superiority and claim perpetual victim status. North Korea is no exception. Oh, and Juche is not a coherent philosophy, and certainly makes no sense if it is supposed to claim self-sufficiency and whine about isolation and sanctions at the same time. But that's fascism for you.
Between visits to schools, hospitals and farms we visited meticulously documented history museums.
"meticulously documented history museums" which leave out the fact that Korea was liberated by the Soviet Union, while Japan was being defeated by the United States, and North Korea was saved by China in the Korean War. The museums claim that Kim Il-sung and his buddies pulled this off with a mere token assistance from allies.
The capital's museums display evidence of Washington's use of chemical and biological weapons against the Korean people, and of 8,000 US breaches of the 1953 armistice, notably the captured US spy ship USS Pueblo.
What chemical and biological weapons are we talking about here?
Also, do you think that
Eva Bartlett Tim Anderson would usually condone the time of beatings and other tortures that the crewmen of the USS Pueblo suffered if they weren't American or if Americans perpetrated these beatings? I think not, but in this case I doubt she's particularly worried.
Carrying out 'vox pop' interviews with professionals, students, workers and farmers we often met statements such as that of rural co-op worker Ms Song Myong Oh: 'of course we do not want war, but we are not begging for peace'. Most seem proud that their country is standing up to an imperial power that has occupied their country for a lifetime, while invading dozens of others.
"Vox pops"! LOL! Through my government supplied minder, I asked questions of local people selected for me by my government supplied minder, who faithfully translated back and forth to give a remarkably consistent view held universally among all people in the areas of Pyongyang we were permitted to visit.
We visited a new 300 bed Children's Hospital, across the road from Pyongyang's Maternity Hospital. A boy was having a cranial CT scan with a German Siemen's machine. That test, like all health services, is free and at state expense. But the new sanctions regime means that
the DPRK can no longer buy such machines or parts for them. North Koreans put a brave face on their self-reliance, and they do produce most of their essential medicines; but individual doctors expressed outrage.
Has this guy ever heard of Potemkin villages? And has this guy thought about how a denuclearization of North Korea would allow the country to buy more equipment for hospitals and to invest in industry and various other things the country is crying out for? Has he considered that the reason why North Korea is building nuclear weapons is that the regime's legitimacy is based solely on military might and that if it actually tried to do well by its citizens then the glaring disparity in wealth between the North and the South would reveal the incompetence of the regime?
Therefore the only thing that keeps the regime in power is to continually reference World War Two and the Korean War as though they were both yesterday and as though victory in the Korean War is right around the corner if everyone will just sacrifice what they can for the war effort. That is what Songun is about, and that is what the nuclear weapon program is about.