• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

They claim hurrican augmentation

What's your point, Bubba? Who is Mike Adams, what won't he "buy", and what is on the video? You've been told endlessly about posting vacuous OPs. I predict less than a dozen responses because you haven't constructed anything worth responding to, and in particular, haven't given a summary of the video, and your opinion.
 
What's your point, Bubba? Who is Mike Adams, what won't he "buy", and what is on the video? You've been told endlessly about posting vacuous OPs. I predict less than a dozen responses because you haven't constructed anything worth responding to, and in particular, haven't given a summary of the video, and your opinion.

Mike Adams (aka The Health Ranger) an alt-health whackaloon. Natural news is his website. Visit it if your bored and want to laugh and point at an idiotic quack.
 
Yes, the hurricane was augmented. We just did it in a very roundabout way. First, we started the industrial revolution...
 
One thing for sure, if weather could be weaponized in any way, the usual nutbags would be on it.

Note: I did not say weather has been weaponized. I think bad guys with means would if they could.
 
One thing for sure, if weather could be weaponized in any way, the usual nutbags would be on it.

Note: I did not say weather has been weaponized. I think bad guys with means would if they could.


The amount of energy that would be required to move a hurricane far far exceeds the total amount of energy that the world produces. It's just CT's being Ct's.
 
The amount of energy that would be required to move a hurricane far far exceeds the total amount of energy that the world produces. It's just CT's being Ct's.




The HAARP crank site theory isnt simply about moving "a hurricane far far"

So, I'd say A+ for a good example of a classic straw man.
 
The HAARP crank site theory isnt simply about moving "a hurricane far far"

So, I'd say A+ for a good example of a classic straw man.
That is exactly what your crank sources claim. For example...

Denying the reality of these daily manmade weather events is akin to denying the existence of the combustion engine, and it is just as easy to prove. If you can understand boiling water, you can understand where trillions of gallons of water vapor come from that create and fuel the daily trillion-gallon floods we see washing a different community away, somewhere in the world. This isn’t debatable, and it is as easy to observe as sunrise.

For ten years, I have been proving the irrefutable reality of daily manufactured flash flood deluge and severe weather – every single day. Denying the reality of these daily manmade weather events is akin to denying the existence of the combustion engine, and it is just as easy to prove.
That is the lunacy you seem to be endorsing.
 
Harvey isn't unusual when you look at the full picture with placement of high and low pressure systems, neither can be controlled by men.

Harvey was a tropical depression that blew into the Texas coast at the exact right time, and at a painfully slow speed.
 
The amount of energy that would be required to move a hurricane far far exceeds the total amount of energy that the world produces. It's just CT's being Ct's.

But they do move, already... somehow. If they are moving without utilizing energy produced in this world we are left contemplating the possibility hurricanes move through some other, extra-natural agency.

Is it Hell-fire?
I'm gonna need a cite.
 
The HAARP crank site theory isnt simply about moving "a hurricane far far"

So, I'd say A+ for a good example of a classic straw man.

Reading comprehension fail. Complete fail, Bubba.

The "far far" doesn't relate to the distance a hurricane was moved. It refers to how much the energy required to move it exceeds the energy production of the world. "It far far exceeds the total amount of energy that the world produces".

Honestly, most 5 years old wouldn't struggle with that. There is plenty in Macgyver1968's post you could have argued with (energy isn't produced, for a start), but instead you chose to make a hash of reading it.
 
Another JAQing thread, throwing out a crackpot source with a crackpot article citing other crackpots, without having the honesty to state one's credence for the cited material.

"...Gore and the climate alarmists directly tell us that we created Hurricane Harvey and all the other “extreme” weather events anyone sees..."

Nope. No one claims global warming "created" Harvey. But here these idiots are ranting about giant nonexistent machines steering and amplifying a hurricane, even though it's meandering path was predicted pretty well ahead of time.

Epic, drooling, halfwittery at it's worst.

Exactly why, Bubba, do you keep citing such drivel, that appears to be the results of a botched amateur lobotomy, and pretend you're just asking about it rather than trying to promote it? Do you think you're fooling anyone with the JAQ routine?

And do you just enjoy having your intelligence insulted by such idiots in the first place?
 
The HAARP crank site theory isnt simply about moving "a hurricane far far"

So, I'd say A+ for a good example of a classic straw man.

Absolutely classic Bubba passive-aggressive willful misinterpretation of what someone very clearly said. Do you really think you're fooling anyone pretending to be that stupid?
 
Absolutely classic Bubba passive-aggressive willful misinterpretation of what someone very clearly said. Do you really think you're fooling anyone pretending to be that stupid?


The honest to god truth sts60, is I miss you so much that I will go to almost any length just to hear you say my name. As nectar, it is.

Please take me back. I beg you. I promise I will stop reading pulps and stop visiting the naughty places.
 
Last edited:
It's all my fault. I purchased some butterflies from China and they escaped when they were being packaged.
 

Back
Top Bottom