• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Happy 70th UFO Anniversary!

EHocking said:
Utterly brilliant.

All you need to do now is get the UFO to stay in between the two mirrors and four lenses and then get all observers to stand within 2 or 3 degrees of the centreline of the device lens/mirror array and HEY PRESTO! you have a . . . . uh, . . . . I dunno . . . . uh, nup, still can't think of anything.
Click to expand...


Check this out.

http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/52f2899569bedd0f6467dd52-480/quantum-stealth.png

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5



Actually, the UFOs in question continue to fly in our skies and are tracked every week by our deep space surveillance assets and multiple dissimilar ground-based radar systems. In one incident, a UFO was in clear view of residents of the LA area in 1942. The Army attempted to shoot down the saucer with 1420 rounds of anti-aircraft shells but failed. The saucer was first detected by radar as it approached the West Coast of California. The object then slowed down and took its time flying along the coast while being fired upon. The saucer continued to fly as if nothing happened. The saucer reversed course and headed in the opposite direction where it came under fire once again. Eventually, the saucer turned west and headed back over the sea. There were deaths associated with this incident.

http://latimesphoto.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/1942verson6001.jpg

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5


http://www.trbimg.com/img-58ac6a2c/turbine/la-1487694453-mlk5byc8l6-snap-photo/750/750x422

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5


http://latimesphoto.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/1945version600.jpg

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5


http://www.rense.com/1.imagesD/hdlnn.jpg

http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/4376/798/1600/172619/Mystery Air Object Seen in Sky Over LA.jpg

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5


https://www.historyanswers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/war_extra_la_examiner.png

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5


http://www.sott.net/image/image/1494/la_ufo_article.jpg

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5


http://www.sott.net/image/image/1495/la_ufo_article_2.jpg

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5


https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qtGd0Evy...sjg5gCLcB/s1600/Foto_Frank_Warren_Detalhe.png

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-SrGzas0y...TSUsACLcB/s1600/Foto_Frank_Warren_Analise.png

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to turn hotlinked picture into a link for rule 5



CBS Reports Video of the UFO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUjVsq3_6is
 
Last edited by a moderator:
smartcooky said:
Why would they even come here in the first place?
Click to expand...


Why does mankind send spacecraft to other planets, the moon and into the far reaches of outer space?

Eventually, the sun will burn out in a few billion years, so let's say that mankind is still around. Knowing that the sun will cease to exist, what will mankind do? Build huge spacecraft and leave earth or simply stay and become extinct?

The sun is only a middle-aged star meaning there could be alien civilizations that are thousands or even millions of years more advanced than mankind who have faced the scenario I've just mentioned.

The Wright Brothers flew their heavier-than-air airplane in 1903 and in less than 70 years later, men were walking on the moon. Where will mankind be in one thousand years or even 1 million years from now technologically speaking? If in 3 thousand years from now that mankind determined that a black hole was heading toward earth, what would mankind do?

We know more about the surface of the moon than we know what's beneath our oceans.

.
 
Last edited:
John Jones said:
Or the reports were part of a Hollywood publicity stunt to promote the movie - which seems more likely to me.
Click to expand...


If you see the movie, "Earth vs. the Flying Saucers," look for the name: Major Donald Keyhoe in the credits. It was Major Keyhoe who was about to reveal what the government knew about flying saucers on Live TV on January 22, 1958.
 
skyeagle409 said:
If you see the movie, "Earth vs. the Flying Saucers," look for the name: Major Donald Keyhoe in the credits. It was Major Keyhoe who was about to reveal what the government knew about flying saucers on Live TV on January 22, 1958.
Click to expand...

I don't care about any Major Donald Kehoe, and It's going to take a lot more than appeals to authority fallacies to convince me of any ET hypothesis for the origin of UFOs.
 
skyeagle409 said:
I wanted to post something about this movie because not many people know that actual saucer events over Washington D.C. was the basis for this movie. Air Force jets was scrambled and one of the Air Force pilot's sent to intercept the saucers was himself surrounded and he called for help to ground controllers as radar operators watched the encounter between the UFOs and his F-94 unfolded on their radar scopes.


Earth vs. The Flying Saucers

The 1952 D.C. incident was made prominent in a classic expose book called "Flying Saucers From Outer Space" by Marine Corps retired Major. Donald Keyhoe, and this later formed the basis for the screenplay of "Earth Vs. The Flying Saucers".

https://www.amazon.com/review/R24E39I4FXPJRQ

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049169/
Click to expand...


You're saying it's a documentary?
 
arthwollipot said:
Can I make a request that you please not post such large and disruptive pictures (which may be hotlinked, which is against the rules)?

Please make your case in words.
Click to expand...


I can go for that and state with these few words; I know the UFOs are those of ET and you know the story behind my sighting. My assistant, when I was employed by Raytheon Aerospace, was involved in the Bentwaters UFO case.

Over the years, the US has been slowly releasing declassified UFO files from the National Archives in preparation for the big story and my prediction is that within our lifetime, ET reality will be revealed at the United Nations, not from the White House, but that is years down the line.
 
John Jones said:
I don't care about any Major Donald Kehoe, and It's going to take a lot more than appeals to authority fallacies to convince me of any ET hypothesis for the origin of UFOs.
Click to expand...


Well, you should because he was the person who was going to reveal ET visitation reality on Live TV before he was cut off by CBS.
 
skyeagle409 said:
I know the UFOs are those of ET...
Click to expand...
No you don't. You think you know, but that's not the same thing. You have excised all doubt from your mind and have interpreted what you have witnessed in that framework. Any evidence anyone else presents - like the undeniable fact that these phenomena can only be explained by incorporeal ghosts - you dismiss out of hand without even stopping to consider whether they might be right.
 
arthwollipot said:
No you don't. You think you know, but that's not the same thing.
Click to expand...


I have been a pilot for 48 years to know what is ours, and what is not ours based on what I observed, the declassified documents I have on hand and radar data listed below, which firmly confirms the object is not that of mankind for which the following radar data applies.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seconds after Heading Speed Altitude lock-on (degrees) (knots) (feet) 00 200 150 7000 01 200 150 7000 02 200 150 7000 03 200 150 7000 04 sharp 200 acceleration 150 6000 05 turn 270 = 22 g 560 6000 06 270 560 6000 07 270 570 6000 08 270 560 7000 09 270 550 7000 10 210 560 9000 11 210 570 10000 12 210 560 11000 13 210 570 10000 14 270 770 7000 15 270 770 6000 16 270 780 6000 17 270 790 5000 18 290 1010 4000 19 290 1000 3000 20 290 990 2000 21 290 990 1000 22 300 990 0000 22.5 300 980 0000 Break lock
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is physically impossible for any aircraft to perform the maneuvers as depicted in the above radar data and stay intact which simply means the craft was not anything devised by mankind.

In addition, I have known for many years that UFOs were being tracked in deep space by satellites, and ground-based deep space surveillance systems. The only reason why the public is not aware of such observations is because the information is classified. However, two cases have been made public, one of which I brought up in regards to the 1984 incident that was confirmed to me by Ron Regehr. That UFO was tracked heading straight for earth at 22,000 mph before it maneuvered near the DSP satellite before heading back into deep space and the only reason why anyone knew about that incident is because that incident was leaked.

Another case involving his DSP satellite was the 1976 Iranian UFO encounter that was also confirmed by a DSP satellite. Such tracking of UFOs in space are quite common yet classified, which is why the public never hear of these encounters. In other words, you can deny the existent of these extraterrestrial objects, but denial won't change the reality that the objects are not those of mankind.
 
Last edited:
skyeagle409 said:
Check this out.

[qimg]http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/52f2899569bedd0f6467dd52-480/quantum-stealth.png[/qimg]...
Click to expand...
WOW!!!!

A 2012 photoshopped mock up of what the material might be able to do if it existed!!!!!
Apparently you can buy these at a discount when you also buy a certain bridge they also have happen to "have" for sale. . . . :rolleyes:

<snip Battle of LA hyperbole that has already been discussed to death>
:big::crazy: ...quoting Bruce Maccabee as an authority... :crazy::big:
 
Last edited:
skyeagle409 said:
It was significant that the finding concluded the EMP came from outside the shielded cable, and what are UFOs known to generate? EMP. What was reported by Air Force security personnel at the time of the shutdown? A UFO hovering overhead.
Click to expand...

I think you misunderstood.

Why would anyone suspect the EMP to come from within the shielded cable? That's nonsense.

An EMP is supposed to come from outside...that's the point of the shielding. Consequently, since the Minutemen were themselves inside
their silos (themselves shielded), this must have been a massive EMP...which leads me to:

skyeagle409 said:
We can take a look here.
Click to expand...

Again, I think you misunderstood my question. Since the EMP must have been massive to have got through the protection and fried the circuits, someone somewhere must have detected it outside of the base itself. Indeed, as an EMP it must have toasted other electrics around there.

And yet the report you cite seems to not mention any of that.
 
skyeagle409 said:
If you see the movie, "Earth vs. the Flying Saucers," look for the name: Major Donald Keyhoe in the credits. It was Major Keyhoe who was about to reveal what the government knew about flying saucers on Live TV on January 22, 1958.
Click to expand...
Why are all your cases so old? Why nothing since the advent of high quality photography in everyone's hand? Why hasn't any government broke the veil of conspiracy silence? Why no great photos from amateur astronomy, plan spotters?
 
RoboTimbo said:
By what means did the aliens kill people?
Click to expand...


In self defense as was the case when Cuban lost one of its Mig-21's that attempted to fire on a UFO. You can read the report here:

The 1967 Cuban Jet Incident

http://www.nicap.org/reports/cuban1.htm


A number of pilots were lost to UFOs and another famous case was the lost of a F-89 that was sent to intercept a UFO. Take a look at these links and understand that aircraft have been lost trying to intercept UFOs. The lucky ones are those who've encountered UFOs and lived to tell about their chilling experiences.


F-89 Crew disappear without a trace while intercepting a UFO

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/09/GeneMonclaMarker.JPG


The Kinross Incident: Did a UFO abduct an Air Force jet interceptor and its crew in 1953?

http://www.ufoevidence.org/Cases/CaseSubarticle.asp?ID=615
 
Last edited:
Cosmic Yak said:
More on the super- convincing and really really real Iran UFO incident.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4315
Click to expand...


As a pilot of 48 years, I find it peculiar that skeptics think that pilots were chasing stars and planets and dismissing the fact the UFOs the pilots encountered were tracked on airborne and ground-based radars, which common sense would rule out celestial bodies as responsible for those UFOs.

The US government didn't think the Iranian pilots were chasing stars or planets. Check out US government documents on the 1976 Iranian UFO encounter, which I might add, was tracked overhead by a U.S. DSP satellite and that the White House was notified of this incident.


Document 1

http://www.nicap.org/reports/iran22.htm

Document 2

http://www.nicap.org/reports/iran23.htm

Document 3

http://www.nicap.org/reports/iran24.htm
 
Last edited:
Tolls said:
I think you misunderstood.

Why would anyone suspect the EMP to come from within the shielded cable? That's nonsense.
Click to expand...


Investigators were looking at all things internally to explain the shutdowns and none were found. It was eventually determined that EMP was responsible for the shutdowns and system evaluations ruled out anything to do with the missiles or the system. The only source of that EMP disruption came from an external source.

* What was reported overhead during the missile shutdowns? A UFO

* What are UFOs known to generate? EMP
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom