Game Over - we have a Death Bed Confession for WTC7!

Oystein

Penultimate Amazing
Oystein
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
18,903
Three days ago at YouNewsWire.com - News. Truth. Unfiltered.

CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: ‘We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11’

79-year-old retired CIA agent, Malcom Howard, has made a series of astonishing claims since being released from hospital in New Jersey on Friday and told he has weeks to live. Mr. Howard claims he was involved in the “controlled demolition” of World Trade Center 7, the third building that was destroyed on 9/11.
...
Trained as a civil engineer, Mr. Howard became an explosives expert after being headhunted by the CIA in early 1980s. Mr. Howard says has extensive experience in planting explosives in items as small as cigarette lighters and as large as “80 floor buildings.”
...
Mr. Howard says he was part of a cell of 4 operatives tasked with ensuring the demolition was successful.
...
Explaining how the building was bought down, Mr. Howard says, “It was a classic controlled demolition with explosives. We used super-fine military grade nanothermite composite materials as explosives. The hard part was getting thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms into the building without causing too much concern. But almost every single office in the Building 7 was rented by the CIA, the Secret Service, or the military, which made it easier.”
Click to expand...

I first spotted this at 911Blogger - although poster "wildbill" in my opinion is the second-sanest person there among those who still have posting privileges.

Let's see where this pops up now! :D
 
"That's right, we did it exactly the way all the untrained Internet Speculators thought we did it! Turns out, 40 years of covert experience in explosives isn't worth as much as you'd think..."
 
Ray Brady said:
And he has made these claims to... whom, exactly?
Click to expand...

I'd guess to Baxter Dmitry, who "covers politics, business and entertainment" for YourNewsWire and "has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one".

He's one of the fine staff of investigative journalists which also include Sean "Cyrus" Adl-Tabatabai, Carol "Phytoforce" Adl and Edmondo "Vince" Burr.

Baxter has given us such fine reads as
All within just one month!
 
So 4 operatives managed to wire the building for demolition. riiiiiiight....

This is back to the old Loose Change forums claims that 4 guys with backpacks could easily run into the burning WTC7 and rig it up for demolition in a couple of hours.

....riiiiiiight....
 
Hey! fake news:

http://www.snopes.com/cia-agent-confesses-wtc7/

There was no truth to the story, which originated with YourNewsWire, a fake news site. As is often the case with fake news, the article lacked critical details such as when and where the confession occurred (other than the vague reference to its taking place “at home”), YourNewsWire provide no explanation of how they alone (and no other news source) learned of this confession, and we found nothing documenting the existence of a former CIA agent named Malcom Howard outside of the just-published YourNewsWire piece.
 
Haha! :D
I tried a reverse-image-search for the photo of the elderly man in intensive care. Found mostly "alt-news" site reblogging the article. Among them James Fetzer on July 13.

And here is a response by Fetzer's archenemy, Kevin Barrett on July 14:
Kevin Barrett said:
Today’s False Flag Weekly News did NOT cover the “bombshell” story of the supposed WTC-7 demolition confession by a dying CIA agent. Why not? Because it’s OBVIOUS ********.

If you can’t tell that this is a made-up story from the way it’s written, you need to take your BS detector in for a tune-up. That’s right, Jim Fetzer, this means you!
Click to expand...
I love it! :D

The funniest thing is that Barrett attributes the article to a "Cass Sunstein agent" journalist "Jay Greenberg", because he found the same article, published on NeonNettle July 14, under that name. Of course the "original" (?) YourNewsWire article ran on July 13.

Jimbo Fetzer adorned his July 13 article with a disclaimer, probably after he saw that Barrett is right:
James Fetzer said:
[Editor's note: Bear in mind that, should this be disinformation, the depiction presented of the demolition of WTC-7 (with the possible exception of the role of "military grade" nano-thermite) bears a striking resemblance to how it was done, as I have elsewhere explained in some detail.]
Click to expand...
Hahaha what brilliant logic! Because the story reads juuust like a 9/11 Twoofer made it up, it is credible?! :D:D
 
Another intellectual bigship of the Twoofment, Paul Craig Roberts, was at least temporarily fooled: On July 15, he blooged:

I have taken down the Baxter Dmitry article
which implies, he first blogged it.
PCR said:
I have taken down the Baxter Dmitry article. Apparently, he is one of these people who like to make practical jokes out of serious matters. PCR
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
By the way, I'm currently engrossed in this new book, "The Exile: The Stunning Inside Story of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda in Flight":

https://www.amazon.com/Exile-Stunning-Inside-Story-Flight/dp/1620409844

The opening chapters detail bin Laden's problem getting satellite TV reception TO WATCH THE NEWS ABOUT HIS ATTACK ON THE WTC. He had to watch it later. Also detailed are the extensive evacuations by key Al Qaeda personnel to avoid being targeted after the attacks.

Which is a all weird if they didn't do it...(which they did).
 
Incidentally...... I don't believe Al Qaeda ever claimed responsibility for the collapse of building 7.............


:boxedin:
 
Last edited:
But you have to admire the NWO for its commitment to equal opportunity. Who else would pluck a middle-aged noodge out of total obscurity, turn him into a top-flight assassin and demolition expert, and let him live out his last days in peace after he confesses to blowing up WTC 7? :crazy:
 
Here's what I'm wondering. If the CIA was responsible for the bombing, and the majority of the office space was rented by the CIA...which made it easier to plant the bombs...then what was the reason for imploding the building? Why would the CIA need to implode their own building?
 
Macgyver1968 said:
Here's what I'm wondering. If the CIA was responsible for the bombing, and the majority of the office space was rented by the CIA...which made it easier to plant the bombs...then what was the reason for imploding the building? Why would the CIA need to implode their own building?
Click to expand...

The Truther line is that they blew up the building to destroy documents...because we all know that the CIA is really bad at destroying, erasing, or misplacing important incriminating evidence.

My question is: Why isn't secretly rigging a high-rise with explosives and leveling it without warning not terrifying enough on its own?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom