• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged All things Trump + Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.
This list is in need of update. Here's the mounting evidence, additions in blue.

  • Trump flat out lied about his relationship with Putin
  • Trump flat out lied about his role in GOP platform concerning Ukraine
  • Manafort flat out lied about his/Trump role in GOP platform
  • Manafort flat out lied about his deep Russian relationships
  • Manafort received money from Russian contacts
  • Trump is pretending that Manafort was minimally involved in the campaign
  • Flynn received money from Russian contacts
  • Flynn flat out lied about his Russian contacts
  • Despite knowing that Flynn was under investigation for Russian (and Turkish) ties, and having been warned that Flynn was a serious security risk, Trump appointed Flynn NSA, fired him only when the facts went public, and continues to coddle him.
  • Trump lied by omission about Flynn's contacts
  • Sessions flat out lied about his Russian contacts
  • Carter Page flat out lied about his Russian contacts
  • Various campaign officials lied about Page's relationship with the campaign
  • Roger Stone flat out lied about his Russian contacts
  • Trump Jr acknowledged significant Russian money coming into the business, but Trump now denies
  • Trump openly encouraged Russia to hack Clinton
  • Trump fired Comey to impede the investigation, and bragged about it to the Russians
  • Kushner omitted meetings with Russians on his security clearance form
  • Don Trump Jr, along with Kushner and Manafort, met with a Russian operative for the purpose of obtaining dirt on Clinton. Don Jr lied about this meeting on multiple occasions. Kushner failed to disclose it on his security clearance form.
 
Last edited:
So let's update the math: 0 + 0 + 0 + ... + 0 + 0 = yup, that's still exactly zero ***** given by anybody who isn't on a bizarre witchhunt

If this is a witch hunt then there's more than enough circumstantial evidence to justify waterboarding Trump until he confesses to cursing his neighbors cattle, riding pigs and other farm animals through chimneys straight to Blåkulla and engaging in carnal knowledge with the devil.
 
The Trumper's response includes the usual contradictions:

The dirt was Russians donating to the DNC. (DT Jr)
The dirt amounted to nothing, meeting ended up about adoptions. (DT Jr)
I didn't change my story. (DT Jr)
It was a setup by the DNC to entrap Trump, like the dossier was. (Prebius)
It's a nothing burger (as if this is all the evidence there ever was). (Chaffetz and DT Jr)
The reason Kushner didn't disclose the meeting on his security clearance form was the form was submitted too soon. (Gorelick, Kushner's attorney)
 
And even if the meeting was about adoptions, said adoption program had been shut down by Putin in retaliation for the Magnitsky Act, which placed sanctions on various Russian officials. There was no way that that adoption program would get back on track, unless it also meant sanctions were being lifted.
 
So let's update the math: 0 + 0 + 0 + ... + 0 + 0 = yup, that's still exactly zero ***** given by anybody who isn't on a bizarre witchhunt
As you might imagine, I find this preposterous.

In the universe I occupy, people on the hot seat who lie like there's no tomorrow do so because they're concealing something. Until now, I suspected we would never get rock solid evidence of collusion, because I would think it's achievable with a wink wink, nudge nudge. These clowns are so inept, now I'm not so sure about that.

Ultimately, I suspect it will have more to do with dirty Russian money coming into Trump's business, and Putin using it to his advantage.
 
As you might imagine, I find this preposterous.

In the universe I occupy, people on the hot seat who lie like there's no tomorrow do so because they're concealing something. Until now, I suspected we would never get rock solid evidence of collusion, because I would think it's achievable with a wink wink, nudge nudge. These clowns are so inept, now I'm not so sure about that.

Ultimately, I suspect it will have more to do with dirty Russian money coming into Trump's business, and Putin using it to his advantage.


You have been fooled so often in the recent past, been so spectacularly wrong as a result, and never saw that those who lie are those who you allow to condition you with their mountains out of molehill junk, that there is little hope that that will change anytime soon. Keep on obsessing over nothing. It's kind of fun to watch, especially combined with your high horse attitude.

btw, New Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally, Not Hacked

Now there's a surprise. :rolleyes:
 
Let me get this straight....

1) Some web site that most people have probably never heard of,
2) quotes an individual who's name is not released (just noted as "The Forensicator"... I thought Trump was supposed to be against "anonymous sources")
3) who is basing the analysis on file timestamps (something that can easily be messed up, if files are copied/repacked/regenerated on computers with incorrect clock settings)
4) and who's analysis contains many statements about possibilities and how things COULD have been done (i.e. they produce no strong proof but only some vague guesses)

And you consider that to be some sort of proof that there was no Russian hacking.
 
It's kind of fun to watch, especially combined with your high horse attitude.

Considering your constant crying and moaning about how unfairly old Trump and Putin is treated i find it really hard to believe you are having much fun at all. No one is falling for your charades.
 
Let me get this straight....

1) Some web site that most people have probably never heard of,
2) quotes an individual who's name is not released (just noted as "The Forensicator"... I thought Trump was supposed to be against "anonymous sources")
3) who is basing the analysis on file timestamps (something that can easily be messed up, if files are copied/repacked/regenerated on computers with incorrect clock settings)
4) and who's analysis contains many statements about possibilities and how things COULD have been done (i.e. they produce no strong proof but only some vague guesses)

And you consider that to be some sort of proof that there was no Russian hacking.


In case you failed to find the analysis, here's the direct link. It includes a link to the Guccifer files, so you have everything to reconstruct what is done there, if you have the skills. If you know the website or the real name of the analyst is obviously completely irrelevant.
 
Do you consider yourself part of the left, or do you consider yourself centrist?

I consider myself Argumemnon. I'm a centrist because of my beliefs and goals, but if you want to run an average and say I'm on the left, go ahead. However averaging opinions sounds very silly since they don't have mathematical values. Let's just say that I'm far from automatically siding with the left on all issues.
 
You have been fooled so often in the recent past, been so spectacularly wrong as a result, and never saw that those who lie are those who you allow to condition you with their mountains out of molehill junk, that there is little hope that that will change anytime soon. Keep on obsessing over nothing. It's kind of fun to watch, especially combined with your high horse attitude.
This "nothing" just won't go away, will it? And it's not just one chewy toy, it's one thing after another.
It's pathetic, but as you imply, no surprise.
 
Donald Trump Jr faces calls to testify before Senate over Russia meeting
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/10/donald-trump-jr-russia-meeting-clinton-statements

Donald Trump’s son is facing calls to testify before the US Senate about his meeting with a Russian lawyer who promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton during last year’s presidential election, and a leading Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee said he wanted to speak to him.

Trump Jr, meanwhile, tweeted: “Happy to work with the committee to pass on what I know”.
This augurs very well. So far everything he's said has simply made things worse, and now they're really bad. It's anybody's guess how deep he'll dig the hole under questioning.

Born way beyond his natural pay-grade if you ask me.

Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said on Monday the Kremlin did not know Veselnitskaya and “cannot keep track” of every Russian lawyer who holds meetings in Russia or abroad.
I so bet they can, and do.
 
In the universe I occupy, people on the hot seat who lie like there's no tomorrow do so because they're concealing something. Until now, I suspected we would never get rock solid evidence of collusion, because I would think it's achievable with a wink wink, nudge nudge. These clowns are so inept, now I'm not so sure about that.
I'm thinking there's every chance.

Ultimately, I suspect it will have more to do with dirty Russian money coming into Trump's business, and Putin using it to his advantage.
While Congress and what passes for the Trump defence team are occupied with the collusion issue, Mueller and his forensicating accountants quietly prepare the killer case. The good old Capone Play.

If the Boesky case is anything to go by (and I think it is) Mueller will find people falling over each other to sell out their friends for a light sentence. My hope is that it spills over the Pond to London and all the dodgy Russian money in the property market there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom