Let's see how the EU deals with the really tough questions, is the holohoax just another genocide, or is it unique in world history ????? From 'EUROPEAN HISTORICAL MEMORY: POLICIES, CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES':
"Public debate during
the Historikerstreit (“historians’ quarrel”) in the second half of the 1980s were thus
highly charged with emotion, after
German right-wing historians had raised the issue of the comparability of Nazi Germany crimes with those of the Soviet Union. At the heart of what developed into a
bitter controversy with intrinsic political dimensions was the question of the
singularity of Auschwitz: while a group of conservative historians, most prominently Ernst Nolte and Andreas Hillgruber, essentially
argued that the Holocaust was not fundamentally different to other experiences of state terror and mass extermination in the 20th century, this view was vehemently repudiated by mainstream left-wing intellectuals who insisted on the uniqueness of the “Final Solution” and
denounced the historians’ writings as politically charged and revisionist.80"
Now, let's ask ourselves the question that troubles the best minds of the EU, is 'the holohoax fundamentally different from other experiences of state terror and mass extermination'? Answer: yes, the holohoax is fundamentally different from examples of other state sponsored terror save one, the only extensively studied historical event comparable to the holohoax is the Salem witch trials.
And now ..... let's watch the mice scurry