What is a "globalist"

in response to the original question "globalist" is often used as a thinly disguised euphemism for "International Jew".
 
Saggy said:
A truly remarkable display of idiocy, the source for the article is Ynetnews
Click to expand...

I disagree completely, dudalb's comment was a very accurate summation of your posts in this thread.

It only appears as idiocy as this is a function of your resolution of cognitive dissonance arising when the outside world contradicts what you want to believe about yourself and your ideas.
 
Praktik said:
So you think it IS "just sour grapes" and "envy"?

I just think thats probably too dismissive of the dynamics at play here... but maybe we're arguing over a characterization that would be hard to demonstrate either way.
Click to expand...

Not just that, it's also a useful bogeyman for native elites to use to deflect attention away from themselves.

"I'm not the one oppressing you, it's those nasty globalists that are stealing your jobs by moving their factories overseas, not me..."
 
Praktik said:
So you think it IS "just sour grapes" and "envy"?

I just think thats probably too dismissive of the dynamics at play here... but maybe we're arguing over a characterization that would be hard to demonstrate either way.
Click to expand...



I'm sure there are plenty of "globalists" who are completely unethical, and will bend or break any law they can in order to generate profit, and that the extra complexity of international trade probably provides them ample opportunities for such. I'm also sure that most of them don't do this, but would be accused of it anyway, even if they were all paragons of virtue. I'm also pretty sure that this exact same dynamic has existed since we invented the concept of money.

I'd be willing to bet that, if we could time-travel back to ancient Sumer, we'd find some people complaining that all those inter-city traders were conspiring to create some sort of "Empire" in order to kill off all the ordinary folks who just lived in City-States, the way The Gods intended them to!
 
Jim_MDP said:
Your reply focuses on the holocaust, when I said genocide.
That's my fault for not being specific.
In other words... I was thinking of the period after WWII..
Click to expand...

In that case, you are even more confused than I originally thought. Since WW II the Jews have invaded an occupied an area of Palestine, slaughtering or driving out the original inhabitants, and to this date are trying to increase the extent of the territory they control, which involves killing or driving into exile the remaining Palestinians. That is, since the end of WW II, the Jews have not beem the victims of the genocide, they have been the perpetrators of the genocide of the Palestinians, see

https://ccrjustice.org/genocide-palestinian-people-international-law-and-human-rights-perspective

Here we can see the Israelis 'brutally resisting genocide' as the Israeli military bombs helpless civilians in Gaza as the Jews watch and applaud from a nearby ridge
hQd8eIT.jpg
 
Last edited:
When you come to think about it, Israel the first and only state created by the global community. That is, the genesis of the state is a long story going back to the Balfour declaration made during WW II whereby Britain ceded the land to the Jews, and finally culminating with the UN sanctioning the state in 1948. So there we can see the power of the globalists at work.

jMFt7WR.jpg
 
Last edited:
When will Saggy fit Gal Gadot, an Isreali, playing Wonder Woman into his conspiracy theory?
 
Saggy said:
When you come to think about it, Israel the first and only state created by the global community. That is, the genesis of the state is a long story going back to the Balfour declaration made during WW II whereby Britain ceded the land to the Jews, and finally culminating with the UN sanctioning the state in 1948. So there we can see the power of the globalists at work.

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/jMFt7WR.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

I remain unconvinced that you do much thinking.

The winning side of WWII rewrote the map of Europe after the Nazi's went TU.

The U.N. had a say in the partition of both Korea and Vietnam.

The U.N. had a bit to say about the map of Europe when communism lost it's lease.
 
Saggy said:
When you come to think about it, Israel the first and only state created by the global community. That is, the genesis of the state is a long story going back to the Balfour declaration made during WW II whereby Britain ceded the land to the Jews, and finally culminating with the UN sanctioning the state in 1948. So there we can see the power of the globalists at work.

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/jMFt7WR.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Poppycock. There are innumerable states created by the international community.
Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Georgia, Armenia, Lebanon- all formed from the break-up of the Ottoman Empire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_the_Ottoman_Empire

Then there's Africa:

https://www.theatlantic.com/interna...-continent-africas-separatist-problem/262171/

What about East Timor?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_East_Timor

You really should study some history before making such silly statements.
 
Saggy said:
When you come to think about it, Israel the first and only state created by the global community.
Click to expand...

Except the divided Koreas, the divided Vietnams, the map of the Middle East post WWI, the map of Europe post-Versailles, the map of Europe after the Congress of Vienna, etc.

That is, the genesis of the state is a long story going back to the Balfour declaration made during WW II whereby Britain ceded the land to the Jews, and finally culminating with the UN sanctioning the state in 1948.
Click to expand...

First, the Balfour Declaration was made during WWI (1917). Second, it did not cede the land to the Jews. Third, the UN didn't sanction the creation of Israel, it recognized that it existed because the people their brought it into being.

So there we can see the power of the globalists at work.
Click to expand...

All I see is your ignorance of history.
 
But Saggy gave a beautiful demonstration of my point about how Globalist is often used as thinly disguised euphemism for "The Jews".
 
Saggy said:
Think international Jew. For a concise intro to the topic, see this article by Churchill ....


http://library.flawlesslogic.com/ish.htm

"International Jews
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race.
..............
It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. "
Click to expand...

Wow, that cherry is rancid, nearly a 100 years old opinion piece. Why not use facts and evidence, instead of BS you cherry pick to support BS you believe due to bias and hate. We can drop the useful part for Holocaust deniers. Brush up on history, stop making up BS out of thin air.
 
Saggy said:
International Jews at work ....
Click to expand...

Is the current crop of Jew haters so inept that that they have to rely on Solzhenitsyn quotes for their propaganda?

His opinion on the subject is just that and no more, regardless of the weight you wish to assign to it.

Whatever happened to the good old days of Jew hatin' where the only question was:

"Boy, are you red? or Red, White and Blue!"

Quoting Solzhenitsyn back then would have gotten a man exiled from the pointy-hat club and they'd repossess the guy's lynchin' rope that he only owed five more payments on to the Grand Dragon, or whatever grand sounding white trash title those inbred ******** could dream up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom