• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

How Long Will Theresa May Last as Prime Minister (UK)

How long will UK Prime Minister Theresa May Last?


  • Total voters
    45
  • Poll closed .
Even the Tories aren't stupid enough to launch a leadership challenge with everything else going on. Bojo is a very clever man, a middling politician and would be dreadful as party leader. Very similar to his potential Labour opposite number.
 
I'll put this here, rather than in the Huge Fire in London thread as this clip of the British House of Cards has appeared on social media making parallels between Theresa May's response to the Grenfell Tower fire and Francis Urquart's response.

There are of course some notable similarities between both the number killed, the blame on underfunding, and the prime minister's failure to show adequate public sympathy with the victims, and May might have wished she had watched this episode recently. Although she comes across more hapless than calculating.

https://vimeo.com/222034879?outro=1
 
I'll put this here, rather than in the Huge Fire in London thread as this clip of the British House of Cards has appeared on social media making parallels between Theresa May's response to the Grenfell Tower fire and Francis Urquart's response.

There are of course some notable similarities between both the number killed, the blame on underfunding, and the prime minister's failure to show adequate public sympathy with the victims, and May might have wished she had watched this episode recently. Although she comes across more hapless than calculating.

https://vimeo.com/222034879?outro=1

Oddly I'd commented in the run up to the election that she seemed to be basing her premiership on 'To Play the King'. Obviously, Urquhart actually got a majority in his election. That coincidence hadn't occurred to me.
 
I'll put this here, rather than in the Huge Fire in London thread as this clip of the British House of Cards has appeared on social media making parallels between Theresa May's response to the Grenfell Tower fire and Francis Urquart's response.

There are of course some notable similarities between both the number killed, the blame on underfunding, and the prime minister's failure to show adequate public sympathy with the victims, and May might have wished she had watched this episode recently. Although she comes across more hapless than calculating.

https://vimeo.com/222034879?outro=1

Well the Panorama programme on the fire tonight is not going to help her. Turns out the government had been promising a review of fire safety standard after a previous fatal fire at a tower block 7 plus years ago and despite constant prodding from a parliamentary committee it never happened. The committee was still pressing the matter in April of this year.
 
Well if she keeps making things worse that push may not be long coming. Mind you anyone whose expecting a successor to do better is being wildly optimistic. Boris Johnson is a disaster waiting to happen every time he makes a comment and David Davis makes May look charismatic.

I think if there was a obviously better alternative, May would have been out the morning after the election. Problem is the Tories have a definent lack of capable leaders with public appeal. Labor is not better off in that respect.
 
Why do these fallen leaders hang on like limpets? We had Ceaucescu (remember him?), Gaddaffi, Gordon Brown, Margaret Thatcher and now the impotent automaton Theresa May, programmed to come out with annoying robotic sound bites.

Why don't they leave with dignity, like David Cameron.
 
In the case of May, I think it is because anybody significantly better is nowhere in sight in Tory Leadership.
 
Why do these fallen leaders hang on like limpets? We had Ceaucescu (remember him?), Gaddaffi, Gordon Brown, Margaret Thatcher and now the impotent automaton Theresa May, programmed to come out with annoying robotic sound bites.

Why don't they leave with dignity, like David Cameron.

Heavy is the head that wears the throne.
 
Why do these fallen leaders hang on like limpets? We had Ceaucescu (remember him?), Gaddaffi, Gordon Brown, Margaret Thatcher and now the impotent automaton Theresa May, programmed to come out with annoying robotic sound bites.

Why don't they leave with dignity, like David Cameron.
Cameron's speed leaving office, and even quitting parliament, effectively impaired his dignity. Dignified events tend to be more measured in their rhythm.

It's not very dignified to think, "Hell I lost. This is a real mess and I'm getting out of it right now. Where's the emergency exit?"
 
Cameron's speed leaving office, and even quitting parliament, effectively impaired his dignity. Dignified events tend to be more measured in their rhythm.

It's not very dignified to think, "Hell I lost. This is a real mess and I'm getting out of it right now. Where's the emergency exit?"

How long before we watch 'developing news' on tv showing a distraught Theresa May cowering in the garden of No.10, with helicopters whirring overhead, with Hammond and Osbourne with their long knives in the wings?

Tomorrow's broadsheets are saying the Conservative-DUP alliance is on the brink of falling through, with DUP making bullying noises.
 
Cameron's speed leaving office, and even quitting parliament, effectively impaired his dignity. Dignified events tend to be more measured in their rhythm.

It's not very dignified to think, "Hell I lost. This is a real mess and I'm getting out of it right now. Where's the emergency exit?"

I think it was more a case of, 'You want Brexit? Then you take responsibility for negotiating it.' Why should he have stayed on to be the whipping boy for a policy he didn't believe in?
 
Frankie Boyle was absolutely lacerating with some of his comments on May in his latest show. Hes fast becoming the closest thing we have to an actual political commentator in this country. Odd that he gets away with it on the BBC.
 
How long before we watch 'developing news' on tv showing a distraught Theresa May cowering in the garden of No.10, with helicopters whirring overhead, with Hammond and Osbourne with their long knives in the wings?

Tomorrow's broadsheets are saying the Conservative-DUP alliance is on the brink of falling through, with DUP making bullying noises.
In dealing with the parliamentary wing of the Orange Order, May seems completely out of her depth, as if she had no idea who these people are, and what they stand for. It will be to her credit (for we must give it where it's due) if she puts an end to her attempts to recruit the DUP to her cause. So maybe Her Majesty won't have to rave about poofs and Fenians after all, in her Gracious Speech.
 
In dealing with the parliamentary wing of the Orange Order, May seems completely out of her depth, as if she had no idea who these people are, and what they stand for. It will be to her credit (for we must give it where it's due) if she puts an end to her attempts to recruit the DUP to her cause. So maybe Her Majesty won't have to rave about poofs and Fenians after all, in her Gracious Speech.

May is facing a legal challenge over the DUP support as it is claimed it breaches the terms of 'impartiality' in the Good Friday Agreement.

A judicial review could go up before the supreme court, as it's to do with constitutional matters.

Theresa May is facing a landmark legal challenge over her proposed deal with the Democratic Unionist party on the grounds that it breaches the Good Friday agreement.

An experienced legal team, which has been involved in constitutional challenges, is planning to apply for a judicial review of the deal once it is announced, the Guardian has learned.

High court judges would be asked to examine whether the pact breaches the British government’s commitment to exercise “rigorous impartiality” in the Good Friday agreement.

In addition, there is a row brewing over election expenses. Unlike mainland parties, Norn parties do not have to declare donations (for security reasons), hence rumours abound about darker forces channeling funds through Norn.

As an example DUP were given £400K to take out a 'LEAVE' advert in METRO'. Plus they misdeclared their election expenses, as did the Conservative party (luckily for them, the CPS declined to prosecute).

Big question is, people TOLD May (including Sinn Fein) the alliance was a breach of the GFA. Does she not have any advisers on this?

Theresa May will be the first Prime Minister since 1974 to go into the Queen's Speech with a minority government and the first in a hundred years to delay Her Maj.

Corbyn said 11 June he would put in an opposition Queen's Speech.

McDonnell has urged a big turn out for a demo.

Today could have a interesting outcome.
 
This is from BBC News.
The Queen will arrive at Parliament in a car, rather than horse-drawn carriage
There will be no royal procession into the House of Lords chamber and the Queen will wear "day dress" rather than robes
Her crown will be driven to the Lords in its own car, but she will wear a hat instead
It is the first state opening with "reduced ceremonial elements" since 1974
This was agreed because of timing issues caused by the snap election - rehearsals clashed with Saturday's Trooping the Colour event​
I wonder if this reduction of "ceremonial elements" has been performed at the Queen's initiative, and is intended as a symbolic reprimand to Theresa May. Anyone here knowledgeable about these matters of protocol, and their hidden meanings?

ETA I note also that "Queen's Speech 2017: May promises 'humility'". Well, she has plenty to be humble about. Maybe she's trying to stop the Queen turning up in a minicab, and making the speech wearing jeans and a t-shirt.
 
Last edited:
In the case of May, I think it is because anybody significantly better is nowhere in sight in Tory Leadership.

I think it more to do with the poison chalice that she has left her successor. Who in their right minds would want to take on the job in these circumstances?
 
I think it more to do with the poison chalice that she has left her successor. Who in their right minds would want to take on the job in these circumstances?

The key point is that potential successors probably think that things could get worse; they'll want to step in when the only way is up.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom