New telepathy test, the sequel.

Nay_Sayer said:
Your difficulties are yours alone.

It's pretty easy to get frazzled when you claim people wanting you to better than a 1-4 (once a 1-3) chance word game and you start your flippancy.

However, I have thought of a way to do this that would only require one word being thought of, Granted you don't get to cherry-pick the results which is a big issue, I'd type it out in full but using my psychic power I know it will lead to the same spot we are at now.

[ For Michel]: I AM USING THE TERM PSYCHIC IN A COMEDIC SENSE HERE I DO NOT HAVE ANY PSYCHIC OR TELEPATHIC POWERS

my apologies for the font disruption, But, it's really needed in this case.
Click to expand...

He's straight-up gonna cite you in confirmation.
 
Matthew Ellard said:
There you go. You now have more evidence of your schizophrenia. You are making up facts to maintain your delusional framework. You don't actually know anything about SKEPP and its protocols to test your fraudulent claim of telepathy and are too frightened to contact them to actually find out.


Originally Posted by calwaterbear "I do indeed have ESP, and know for a fact that he wrote 2!" It means a person on a forum is teasing you. Are you going to make another delusional claim and claim no person on a forum is ever sarcastic? That would be completely nuts.


It is obvious you are very aware you are not telepathic. The first obvious evidence for this is that your stories keep changing. You initially stated you heard other people's voices ("Kill yourself, Kill yourself")
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110320143839AAdd8JS

...and then you got changed your mind and claimed animals and people heard your voice. However, we know you are lying. I wrote your full name on this forum and you demanded it was removed, which it was. If people all heard your thoughts we would all know your full name anyway , so it would not matter if I wrote your full name. That was the clear evidence you are lying.

You are simply procrastinating to avoid accepting that you suffer a common and curable psychiatric illness. You are simply upset because you want to be something special so you can keep trolling forums telling people you might be telepathic.
Click to expand...
Michel H, could you address the highlighted?

If everyone reads your thoughts then why are you bothered about personal details on a public forum?
 
p0lka said:
Michel H, could you address the highlighted?

If everyone reads your thoughts then why are you bothered about personal details on a public forum?
Click to expand...
It seems to me that, psychologically, there is a big difference between involuntarily communicating thoughts (including one's last name) through ESP on the one hand, and giving one's full name on a forum, on the other hand.
 
Last edited:
Michel H said:
It seems to me that, psychologically, there is a big difference between involuntarily communicating thoughts (including one's last name) through ESP on the one hand, and giving one's full name on a forum, on the other hand.
Click to expand...

Oh, this is rich! Yes. Using a forum actually transmits one's name. Beaming it from one's noggin merely fails to.
 
Michel H said:
Perhaps you are too modest, I have not forgotten that you were undoubtedly the main star of a telepathy test I did very recently on this forum:
Click to expand...

Well, you did score 0% and I was able to tell everyone how you'd ignore the test results.

I give the assist to everyone else who told you the same thing.
 
Matthew Ellard said:
There is an international organisation of people, who believe in telepathy, who can help you establish a proper scientific experiment. It is called the Parapsychological Association. Even better, you have already exchanged communication with Craig Weiler from this organisation in one of your internet telepathy tests.
Click to expand...
http://www.parapsych.org/users/cweiler/profile.aspx

Michel H said:
I fail, however, to understand why you see contradiction where there is none.
Click to expand...
Craig Weiler from the Parapsychological Association, who believes in telepathy and wants to prove its existence, stated your "test" was fundamentally flawed and needed more than 4 choices. You ignored him and offered no counter argument, because you know you are not telepathic and wan't to avoid any such test as that would end your excuse for trolling science forums. It is quite obvious.


Michel H said:
If the Parapsychological Association had done its job properly, telepathy would be universally recognized
Click to expand...
Yet simultaneously you claim to be the world's only provable telepathic person and refuse to be tested by them. That is because you know you are not telepathic and will fail the test. We all know that.

You have run out of you poor excuses for avoiding any proper test . Either do the test or go away.
 
Michel H / PIN No# for banking

As many of you have guessed Michel H is not telepathic and we can't all secretly read his mind. I'm going to prove this with one final experiment.

The "End this crap claim" Experiment
When Michel H next enters his bank account no#, PIN and password into his computer, I want everyone to attempt to clear his bank account. :)

The first person to clear Michel H's bank accounts wins!
 
Matthew Ellard said:
As many of you have guessed Michel H is not telepathic and we can't all secretly read his mind. I'm going to prove this with one final experiment.

The "End this crap claim" Experiment
When Michel H next enters his bank account no#, PIN and password into his computer, I want everyone to attempt to clear his bank account. :)

The first person to clear Michel H's bank accounts wins!
Click to expand...

Actually it can be much less personal and more simple than that, again I'm not bothering to lay out the details but if you're interested I had made this: projectharpoon.wixsite.com/telepathytest
 
Last edited:
Results of a new test

I have recently done a new test on Yahoo Answers.

My question was:
I recently wrote and circled one of the three letters: "A", "B", and "C", on my paper.

I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it).

Thank you for participating.
Click to expand...
I was able to obtain more answers than on this forum (!) since five people quickly participated. Three persons gave the correct answer ("C", in the case of this simple test). This gave a hit rate of 60%, much higher than the 33% of random chance.

The best answer rates (Note: On Yahoo Answers, the best answer rate of a member gives a rough idea of this member's quality) of people who gave incorrect answers were:
Ela the Elephant: 3%
ice: 7%
The best answer rates of those who answered correctly were:
SHAMe: 7%
DRDEATH: 7%
Wayf: 13%

Clearly, those who answered correctly had a better average best answer rate.
 
Michel H said:
I have recently done a new test on Yahoo .
Click to expand...
No Michel. We have collectively, already dismissed your flawed internet polls as worthless.

You have internet banking and enter your account no#, password and PIN numbers on a regular basis.

You claim we can all read your thoughts.

You simultaneously claim that we are dishonest.

Please explain why no one has cleared your bank account?

In reality, you know you are not telepathic and are simply using your ridiculous internet tests as a weak device to avoid seeing a general medical practitioner concerning your probable schizophrenia.
 
Michel H said:
I have recently done a new test on Yahoo Answers.

My question was:

I was able to obtain more answers than on this forum (!) since five people quickly participated. Three persons gave the correct answer ("C", in the case of this simple test). This gave a hit rate of 60%, much higher than the 33% of random chance.

The best answer rates (Note: On Yahoo Answers, the best answer rate of a member gives a rough idea of this member's quality) of people who gave incorrect answers were:
Ela the Elephant: 3%
ice: 7%
The best answer rates of those who answered correctly were:
SHAMe: 7%
DRDEATH: 7%
Wayf: 13%

Clearly, those who answered correctly had a better average best answer rate.
Click to expand...
Link of the test: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20170521143338AAEEoVr
 
Kid Eager said:
The test protocols for that test are pathetic. Only 3 options in your sample set, one of them being the default choice where you don't know an answer (and was also your choice)? Absolutely and utterly fraudulent.

I feel sad and embarrassed for you, that you think your "test" does anything except confirm your mistaken preconceptions.
Click to expand...
Telepathy test protocols don't need to be complicated, I have gradually simplified them (and I have also dropped the "I don't know" option). The target in this test (chosen by the random number generator I used via the correspondence 3 → C) was "C", not "I don't know".

The small number of options is not a problem from the point of view of statistical evidence because I usually get several answers, and tests may be repeated. It has the fundamental advantage of making tests easier for people (both technically and psychologically).

There were a few unusual things about Wayf's answer, can you find them?
 
Last edited:
Michel, what level of confidence do you attach to the answer, "C - for crock of *****. This isn't your goddamned experimental site"? Since this is clearly a hostile response, have you chosen to discount it on those grounds, or have you decided to suspend your customary assignation of a low confidence level to a hostile or non-serious answer because in this case it happens to match the answer you wanted to get?

Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom