Destroyed Atlantis = Menorah

[Craig4]

So, there ARE sunken ruins at Tarshish. I've posted the pictures.

Are there volcanic quarries with red and black stone nearby?

---

Would simple core samples that indicts the presence of red and black volcanic stone, be convincing evidence?

Why do you think the ruins are Tarshish?

 

[King of the Americas]

We have documentation to indicate how, when and why those traditions were adopted. Where's your evidence of Atlantis being tied to a menorah? I'm at a loss as to why you feel you get to skip the step of actually documenting the association of the menorah and your Atlantis.

Watch the video, review this thread, the evidence you seek has been provided.

 

[King of the Americas]

Why do you think the ruins are Tarshish?

As with all real-estate ....location location location.

 

[Craig4]

Watch the video, review this thread, the evidence you seek has been provided.

I am aware of no mention of a menorah in any of Plato's works.

 

[Craig4]

As with all real-estate ....location location location.

When you've been in Rome, have you noticed how hard it is to find anything with the letters SPQR on it?

 

[King of the Americas]

I am aware of no mention of a menorah in any of Plato's works.

Please, pretty please, review this thread, THEN ask a question.

 

[King of the Americas]

When you've been in Rome, have you noticed how hard it is to find anything with the letters SPQR on it?

Rome never left the map, right?

 

[Craig4]

Rome never left the map, right?

You miss my point. If you are in Rome it's hard not to see that you're in Rome because there are messages telling you that you're in Rome. Everywhere you look you see SPQR. Can you point to anything like that in what you say is Tarshesh?

 

[Craig4]

Please, pretty please, review this thread, THEN ask a question.

I have. You just can't associate with menorah with your Atlantis. You have some wishful thinking you've communicated and some rather odd non sequiturs but your work is poor and you fail to make any substantive connection.

 

[King of the Americas]

You miss my point. If you are in Rome it's hard not to see that you're in Rome because there are messages telling you that you're in Rome. Everywhere you look you see SPQR. Can you point to anything like that in what you say is Tarshesh?

It's underwater, covered by the ocean...

I think a more apt comparison is the Sri Lanka.

 

[King of the Americas]

I have. You just can't associate with menorah with your Atlantis. You have some wishful thinking you've communicated and some rather odd non sequiturs but your work is poor and you fail to make any substantive connection.

If you disagree that a symbol can be adopted, like the Nike Swoosh, without the adopter ever having heard of the phrase "Just Do It.", Michael Jordan, or Tiger Woods, then say so...

Also, this isn't 'my' research or me claims. They belong to James Cameron and National Geographic.

 

[Craig4]

If you disagree that a symbol can be adopted, like the Nike Swoosh, without the adopter ever having heard of the phrase "Just Do It.", Michael Jordan, or Tiger Woods.

Also, this isn't 'my' research or me claims. They belong to James Cameron and National Geographic.

Learn the difference between "could" and "were".

 

[King of the Americas]

Learn the difference between "could" and "were".

Symbols HAVE, and are still being adopted.

The shape, location, date, AND biblical record prove the menorah WAS in fact just such a symbol, adopted without "provenance."

 

[John Jones]

I simply don't understand your difficultly with symbol adoption...

Those who adopted it, 'turned it INO the menorah' because they didn't have access to its original meaning.

How does an upside down menorah make sense to you?

HaHaHaHa! That's some funny **** right there!

 

[John Jones]

I don't understand [...]

Obviously.

 

[Craig4]

Symbols HAVE, and are still being adopted.

The shape, location, date, AND biblical record prove the menorah WAS in fact just such a symbol, adopted without "provenance."

Which is another way of saying that you can't establish a relationship between a menorah and your Atlantis.

 

[Craig4]

If you disagree that a symbol can be adopted, like the Nike Swoosh, without the adopter ever having heard of the phrase "Just Do It.", Michael Jordan, or Tiger Woods, then say so...

Also, this isn't 'my' research or me claims. They belong to James Cameron and National Geographic.

Their work sucks as bad as yours. Yes symbols can be adopted. You just can't prove it happened in this case.

 

[King of the Americas]

HaHaHaHa! That's some funny **** right there!

Call it a bucket of bull butter...no censorship needed.

 

[King of the Americas]

Which is another way of saying that you can't establish a relationship between a menorah and your Atlantis.

You mean, except the "shape, date, and location"...?

*yawn*

 

[King of the Americas]

Their work sucks as bad as yours. Yes symbols can be adopted. You just can't prove it happened in this case.

"What we have here, is a failure to communicate."

Saying work sucks isn't an argument.