Probably a member of the Church of Current Day Morons!!!!She's a moron.
Probably a member of the Church of Current Day Morons!!!!She's a moron.
My wild guess is she was just trying to blame something that was not the city government/her fault!!!! And force everyone who is poor to go to Sunday School and sin no more!!!She doesn't even have to go that far. SA has a huge Catholic population; hell, they have a huge religious population. 20% of SA is living in poverty. That was an extremely dopey thing to say for the mayor of a city with SA's demographics.
Generational poverty is a leading cause of imagined relationships with creators.
Nice to see a strong black woman speaking her mind.
Amen
Why the heck did you bring her skin color into the discussion ?
No, really, why ?
Stereotype much?Why not, it is accurate isn't it? It is true that African Americans suffer disproportionately from generation poverty is it not? Therefore she is in a position to address it.
Nope.urban minority under Democrat administrations suffer disproportionately from generational poverty, agree?
Stereotype much?
"Being a white male meant he was in a great position to address the disproportionate concentration of wealth by the top 1%"
Nope.
Why not, it is accurate isn't it?
It is true that African Americans suffer disproportionately from generation poverty is it not?
http://www.gallup.com/poll/142727/religiosity-highest-world-poorest-nations.aspxEach of the most religious countries is relatively poor, with a per-capita GDP below $5,000. This reflects the strong relationship between a country's socioeconomic status and the religiosity of its residents. In the world's poorest countries -- those with average per-capita incomes of $2,000 or lower -- the median proportion who say religion is important in their daily lives is 95%. In contrast, the median for the richest countries -- those with average per-capita incomes higher than $25,000 -- is 47%.
Nope.
It is also true that the African-American community is very religious. Which kinda shoots her theory down.
This is obviously silly, and can be demonstrated in a thousand ways.
Here's one:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/142727/religiosity-highest-world-poorest-nations.aspx
I think it's pretty obvious that the causality runs from wealth --> lack of religion, as opposed to adopting religion making someone or a nation poor, but it still rejects the notion that being religious brings wealth.
It isn't religion unless it's her specific brand of Christianity, obviously. Islam is not a religion. Nor is Catholocism, to a great many fundies. Just another cult.
We're in violent agreement here. It's how the mayor sees it I'm pointing out.You're totally correct about the way Christian fundamentalists view the world, but a whole lot of poor African and Latin American countries are really, really Christian. As are some of the poorer European nations.
The country with the highest GOP is Qatar. That is not religious is it?
Hmm, UAE, Brunei....
Very religious. Very rich. Almost as if religion has a positive correlation with wealth.
Thank you Allah!
Isn't Christianity the religion around Jesus, the guy who said to give all your possessions away, and kept harping about how wealth was evil, and something about shoving a needle right throught a rich person's eye? If I worshipped a deity who said stuff like that I'd try hiding my money in a secret bank account in Hell where he couldn't find out about it.
The country with the highest GOP is Qatar. That is not religious is it?
Hmm, UAE, Brunei....
Very religious. Very rich. Almost as if religion has a positive correlation with wealth.
Thank you Allah!
So, as I understand it from a very smart guy with a M.Div. from Duke, back in the old days, there were walls around cities.
And people got around on camels.
So, at various intervals at the wall around the city, there would be an "eye of a needle" - basically, a small archway - that one would 'thread' one's camel through.
The camel had to get down on its knees and shuffle its way through. The camel had to kind of crawl.
Apparently, Biblical-age people would brick up the 'eye of the needle' when the city was likely to be under attack.
A lovely story and an excellent parable for preaching but unfortunately unfounded! From at least the 15th century, and possibly as early as the 9th but not earlier, this story has been put forth, however, there is no evidence for such a gate, nor record of reprimand of the architect who may have forgotten to make a gate big enough for the camel and rider to pass through unhindered.
... The needle in Matthew and Mark is a rafic. In Luke it is a belone. But both are synonyms for needles used in sewing, but Luke's is more likely to be used by a surgeon than a seamstress.
So, as I understand it from a very smart guy with a M.Div. from Duke, back in the old days, there were walls around cities.
...snip..
I guess that explains Mexico's poverty, it's not like nearly 90% of the population are Catholic or anything....
That's a nice story, of course there is nothing to support it and quite a bit of evidence to show it is probably baloney. The more commonly accepted view is that it was a mistranslated word - should be cable/rope not camel*.
* as in the revolting creature that should be wiped from the face of the earth and knowledge of their existence expunged from history.