Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator

[LTC8K6]

Brilliant Light has solved the theory, confirmed Hydrino reaction products by many analytical techniques, and identified Hydrino as the pervasive dark matter of the universe. The SunCell® was invented and engineered to harness this clean energy source of optical power of thousands of Sun equivalents that can be directly converted to electrical output using commercial photovoltaic cells. SunCell® technology is under rapid development for commercialization. Prototypes are already continuously producing hundreds of thousands of watts of light that is ideal for concentrator photovoltaic conversion being engineered and fabricated at leading photovoltaic (PV) companies. The performance to date indicates that the SunCell® is capable of rapid displacement of fuels, power sources, and infrastructure due to its superior performance, lower cost, lack of pollutant by-products, and use of existing mass-produced components.

I'm sure this has come up before.

From the November 2016 business summary. Already continuously working in the 100's of KW range. Can use commercial PV cells. Leading PV companies are making PV cells for the Sun Cell. Uses existing mass-produced components.

They have identified dark matter.

http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/Business Summary 111016.pdf

 

[jrhowell]

The validation reports have been published on BLP's website over time. Check out http://brilliantlightpower.com/validation-reports/ for the more recent ones.

I took a look at one of the validation reports by K.V Ramanujachary.

It describes experiments carried out by BLP using BLP equipment that he witnessed. It is even unclear whether he wrote the report or just signed off on it. Whoever wrote it seems to be a "true believer". That is about as far from independent validation as you can get.

I found page 7 to be particularly funny. It is a series of photos of broken equipment with the caption:

Figure 4A-C. Images of SunCells® that underwent meltdown in about 10 s due to the extraordinary power generated in the reactor.

I would have instead titled it "devices that quickly self-destructed due to incompetent engineering."

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Right, I'm no laser expert (although I do happen to know one who I'll ask about this, although maybe not for a week or two), but if the light being emitted as of a broad spectrum from infrared to ultraviolet, then that's not a blue laser, is it? "Blue" is only some of those frequencies.

Secondly, what on Earth do they mean by "miniaturising" the multispectrum light into microns? What exactly are they talking about there?

Finally, if you look at that diagram, it appears that Mills thinks that such a laser would require a constant supply of water in order to keep functioning. But there's no reason, if the laser actually used water vapour instead of a crystal, for that vapour to need replacing. The diagram makes it appear as if Mills thinks that the laser beam itself is made up of water vapour.

Basically, that illustration makes it look like Mills doesn't really know what a laser is or how it works.

 

[hecd2]

With increasing temperature the power spectrum curve shifts to the left, such that photons in the visible range predominate when the temperature is around say 5000K.

At#3216 I asked you this: "[46% efficiecy of concentrator PC cells is possible] Under standard conditions with 5 junction cells - with an incident colour temperature of ~5800K, an incident power density of 1000W/m2 and a temperature of 25 degrees C.

So Markie, what temperature will the graphite dome run at, what is the incident power density predicted to be, and what temperature will the PV cells be operating at?

 

[Aepervius]

Of course others have independently confirmed the excess energy of hydrino formation, the spectroscopic evidence of hydrino formation, and the signatures of hydrino or dihydrino or hydrino hydride. You seem to believe that every positive scientific paper / experiment about hydrino has Mills as an author. Such is not the case.

You realize that repeating something ad nauseam does not make it true, right ?

There is no independent team which had evidence of Hydrino existence.

 

[Aepervius]

I took a look at one of the validation reports by K.V Ramanujachary.

It describes experiments carried out by BLP using BLP equipment that he witnessed. It is even unclear whether he wrote the report or just signed off on it. Whoever wrote it seems to be a "true believer". That is about as far from independent validation as you can get.

I found page 7 to be particularly funny. It is a series of photos of broken equipment with the caption:



I would have instead titled it "devices that quickly self-destructed due to incompetent engineering."

Markie refuse adamantly to admit what independent means. In a way the conversation remind me of the jabba thread of immortality : once all objection have been given, they are waived with a simple gesture of hand, and the same argument "validation" repeatedly given , in spite of having shown to be improper.

By this point we are not arguing with Jabba/markie anymore, we are showing the info for lurker and google.

 

[Dave Rogers]

I'm sure this has come up before.

Brilliant Light has solved the theory, confirmed Hydrino reaction products by many analytical techniques, and identified Hydrino as the pervasive dark matter of the universe. The SunCell® was invented and engineered to harness this clean energy source of optical power of thousands of Sun equivalents that can be directly converted to electrical output using commercial photovoltaic cells. SunCell® technology is under rapid development for commercialization. Prototypes are already continuously producing hundreds of thousands of watts of light that is ideal for concentrator photovoltaic conversion being engineered and fabricated at leading photovoltaic (PV) companies. The performance to date indicates that the SunCell® is capable of rapid displacement of fuels, power sources, and infrastructure due to its superior performance, lower cost, lack of pollutant by-products, and use of existing mass-produced components.

From the November 2016 business summary.

Interesting, given that markie recently said:

I should qualify. The short burst reaction in the SunCell is already provably power dense. Long term reactions (of hours) in the SunCell have already been performed, but at necessarily low power. When the dome is closed both the power density and the sustained reaction will - presumably - be attained. That will be the moment of truth. If that fails (without reasonable excuse), I will probably be disappointed enough to reassess my belief.

A question, markie. Which of the following statements is true, given that at least and at most one must be true?

(1) The SunCell is already producing hundreds of kilowatts of energy continuously at suitable wavelengths for PV cells, in which case your statement is untrue in its implication that the power density and the sustained reaction have not simultaneously been achieved?
(2) The SunCell is not yet producing hundreds of kilowatts of energy continuously at suitable wavelengths for PV cells, and BLP has knowingly released a false statement?
(3) The SunCell is not yet producing hundreds of kilowatts of energy continuously at suitable wavelengths for PV cells, but BLP does not have the engineering competence to understand that this is the case?

If (1), then clearly your statements on BLP are not credible. One might ask why BLP has not simply demonstrated this extraordinary radiant source publically, which would silence its critics instantly.
If (2), then BLP is defrauding its investors.
If (3), then BLP is incompetent to a staggering degree.

So which is it - you don't know what's going on at BLP, BLP doesn't know what's going on at BLP, or the whole thing's a fraud?

Dave

 

[hecd2]

Right, I'm no laser expert (although I do happen to know one who I'll ask about this, although maybe not for a week or two), but if the light being emitted as of a broad spectrum from infrared to ultraviolet, then that's not a blue laser, is it? "Blue" is only some of those frequencies.

I was working with gas and dye lasers in the 1970s, and excimer lasers in the 80s. For a continuous working laser to work it needs a medium that has a quasi-stable excited state into which the pump energy pumps the molecules or atoms, so you end up with an inverted energy state, and an optical cavity tuned to the energy between the quasi-stable state and some lower stable state. The up transition is pumped and the down transition is stimulated by radiation in the cavity at the wavelength. Hence Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Some types of CW laser operate at a few well defined wavelengths given by the transition energy or energies. This include most sorts of gas laser (helium neon, helium cadmium, argon, krypton etc). Dye lasers can generally lase at a wider range of wavelengths and can be tuned by adjusting the cavity.

Secondly, what on Earth do they mean by "miniaturising" the multispectrum light into microns? What exactly are they talking about there?

Could be that that's the journalist misinterpreting what was said to him? Maybe he was claiming that the device itself could be made into microns? Which is also quite silly.

Finally, if you look at that diagram, it appears that Mills thinks that such a laser would require a constant supply of water in order to keep functioning. But there's no reason, if the laser actually used water vapour instead of a crystal, for that vapour to need replacing. The diagram makes it appear as if Mills thinks that the laser beam itself is made up of water vapour.

He doesn't talk about water vapour - he talks about hydrogen. The Balmer series is in the visible but hydrogen doesn't have the energy inversion to a quasi-stable state that is required for a laser. So I don't think it would work.

Basically, that illustration makes it look like Mills doesn't really know what a laser is or how it works.

The illustration is awful.

 

[Darat]

...snip...

He doesn't talk about water vapour - he talks about hydrogen. The Balmer series is in the visible but hydrogen doesn't have the energy inversion to a quasi-stable state that is required for a laser. So I don't think it would work.

The illustration is awful.

Serious question - would the hypothetical hydrino gas have such a property?

 

[Dave Rogers]

Serious question - would the hypothetical hydrino gas have such a property?

If you viewed the ground state of hydrogen as a long-lived metastable state, then yes it might. The problem there is that, if that were true, and stimulated emission from the ground state had a reasonable cross-section, it would be possible to force a hydrogen atom into a lower state by hitting it with a photon in the blue part of the spectrum, which would mean that relaxation below the ground state of hydrogen would have to be a very common phenomenon. The claim as I understand it is that hydrogen can't relax below the ground state without a resonant interaction with another atom that has the required energy difference, which would imply that a hydrino laser is impossible because the transition can't be initiated by a photon. As usual, though, the whole theory is so poorly stated and internally inconsistent that it's almost impossible to find anything solid enough to critique.

Dave

 

[jrhowell]

Of course the real discovery that Mills is trying desperately to keep quiet is the discovery of dark energy.

How else can you explain devices that produce 100KW of power continuously and at the same time generate only "low grade" heat? These devices aren't exploding from the enormous heat. They are shattering from the sudden extreme temperature drop caused by the enormous cold!

 

[Hans]

Well it would seem markie's 'counter-attack' failed to stem the the tide of the, 'he's a fraud' crowd at all. He seemed to just repeat all the same failed arguments....which failed, again.

Oh well lets recap: Mills says he has the technology, it works and soon it will be in production but nothing happens and this same schtik has been repeating for 30 years?

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

I was working with gas and dye lasers in the 1970s, and excimer lasers in the 80s. For a continuous working laser to work it needs a medium that has a quasi-stable excited state into which the pump energy pumps the molecules or atoms, so you end up with an inverted energy state, and an optical cavity tuned to the energy between the quasi-stable state and some lower stable state. The up transition is pumped and the down transition is stimulated by radiation in the cavity at the wavelength. Hence Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Some types of CW laser operate at a few well defined wavelengths given by the transition energy or energies. This include most sorts of gas laser (helium neon, helium cadmium, argon, krypton etc). Dye lasers can generally lase at a wider range of wavelengths and can be tuned by adjusting the cavity.

The article refers to the output as "multispectrum laser light", yet the entire point of the laser is that it's blue. The laser light emitted cannot be both blue and spanning from infrared to violet.

Could be that that's the journalist misinterpreting what was said to him?

I'm not about to make the claim that science journalism is accurate and doesn't say silly things. But, then, I'm not about to make the claim that Mills' claims are accurate and that he doesn't say silly things, either.

He doesn't talk about water vapour - he talks about hydrogen.

He talks about "heat[ing] water vapor with microwaves to generate
energized hydrogen atoms", and if you look at the illustration it literally has water being heated and the vapour being directed into the microwave cavity as a lasing medium. Both the text and the illustration concur on that being what's supposedly happening.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Here is a patent application for the hydrino laser, from 7 years after that article was published. It doesn't seem to think that water vapour is a suitable lasing medium any more.

There's some maths in there which is beyond me, if anybody with the requisite background knowledge wants to have a go. Again, I'll probably sic my expert on it in the next couple of weeks.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

I can't find more than the abstract, but here is the paper in which Mills first proposes a hydrino laser. It seems that the person writing the article just copied directly from that:

High-power hydrogen gas lasers are anticipated at wavelengths over a broad spectral range from far infrared to violet which may be miniaturized to micron dimensions. Such a hydrogen laser may prove to be the most versatile and useful of all.

 

[Matthew Cline]

Here is a patent application for the hydrino laser, from 7 years after that article was published.

Wait, since hydrinos are supposed to neither emit nor absorb photons, how could they be using as a lasing medium?

 

[Dancing David]

The validation reports have been published on BLP's website over time. Check out http://brilliantlightpower.com/validation-reports/ for the more recent ones.

So not actually peer reviewed, looks like a vanity publication.

(Firefox did not like or load the .pdf link, cause who knows)

 

[Dancing David]

Of course others have independently confirmed the excess energy of hydrino formation, the spectroscopic evidence of hydrino formation, and the signatures of hydrino or dihydrino or hydrino hydride. You seem to believe that every positive scientific paper / experiment about hydrino has Mills as an author. Such is not the case.

And those published articles are?

 

[hecd2]

Here is a patent application for the hydrino laser, from 7 years after that article was published. It doesn't seem to think that water vapour is a suitable lasing medium any more.

There's some maths in there which is beyond me, if anybody with the requisite background knowledge wants to have a go. Again, I'll probably sic my expert on it in the next couple of weeks.

Forget all the guff in the disclosure. It's just stuff copied from Mills's book and it doesn't render properly in any of my browsers anyway. Just go to the claims at the very end. He is claiming any laser which works on transitions between fractional states of molecular hydrogen. If it's that easy to get a population inversion and stimulate emission, then that's completely inconsistent with his claim that you can't detect hydrinos and that they are dark matter. It's a mess.

 

[jrhowell]

If it's that easy to get a population inversion and stimulate emission, then that's completely inconsistent with his claim that you can't detect hydrinos and that they are dark matter. It's a mess.

Yes, but that was with Hydrino 1.0. He is now working with Hydrino 2.0. Totally different set of properties!