Emily's Cat
Rarely prone to hissy-fits
...and that paperboy is looking more like capitalist swine every day...
Clearly there's no bias on your part, hmm?
...and that paperboy is looking more like capitalist swine every day...
Are you under the misconception that I support the rioters? No way. But I support truth, warts and all. People see what happened in Orange County and assume it is the bad old anarchists being evil. They don't see the reporting that is right in front of their eyes, that the marchers were unabashedly aggressive. Pretty soon, it becomes any protest is 'those bad old anarchists' again...gently sliding towards 'those bad old Leftists' again. The goodthink scares me more than any anarchist.
Clearly there's no bias on your part, hmm?
Piling all sorts of empty rhetorical appeals to emotion on top of antisocial behavior doesn't justify it.
they're trying to intimidate other people into not thinking things that they (the intimidators) have deemed unacceptable thoughts.
Piling all sorts of empty rhetorical appeals to emotion on top of antisocial behavior doesn't justify it.
Clearly there's no bias on your part, hmm?
Given that in this and other threads, you've taken the position that you find preemptive violence against certain beliefs to be acceptable, and believe it should be sufficient to excuse some of those violent actors from the law, yes, I am under the impression that you support the rioters.
In regards to your now repeated "goodthink" comments... you seem to be willfully overlooking that fact that some people are using violence and aggression in an attempt to control beliefs - they're trying to intimidate other people into not thinking things that they (the intimidators) have deemed unacceptable thoughts. Maybe you should go back and review the basis of "goodthink" before you bury yourself in an argument that doesn't support you.
What exactly was the empty rhetoric, appeal to emotion...
What an odd comment.... you just quoted my post saying they wanted to "physically" stop the march, and ask me where the "willingly" and "force" part comes into play?
What do you think "physically stop" something means?
What an odd series of posts this has been.
feel free to defend these accusations of "antisocial" without empty rhetorical appeals to emotion.
The "wall" people were looking for exactly what they got - a physical confrontation that they could try and exploit in the media. They are, once again, the agitators. They are the soccer players who roll on the ground after tripping over their own shoelaces, hoping for a penalty.
Indeed.
In what I'll call BlocTards Vs. TrumpTards: Huntington Beach Edition, You can clearly see who the instigators are. Should the TrumpTards have kept cooler heads and taken the high road? Sure, but They're TrumpTards who've been exposed the media hype and as such are ready to fight at the slightest provocation. Good thing the BlocTards didn't disappoint. In this pic we see a person who I'll call BlocTard #1, retaliating against a Trumptard after their wall was breached. This led to the first scuffle where the TrumpTard Event Organizer was pepper sprayed.
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard14.jpg[/qimg]
As the second scuffle starts to develop, we see BlocTard #2, pepper spray already in hand, moving into position.
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard13.jpg[/qimg]
Back to BlocTard #1 (center left with red garment in hand), having struck one TrumpTard, is ready to have a go at another, this time wisely picking one roughly twice her size.
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard2.jpg[/qimg]
Notice BlocTard #3 entering the frame at foreground left, pepper spray in hand. BlocTard #2 is still holding station in the background.
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard3.jpg[/qimg]
BlocTard #1 strikes the TrumpTard as BlocTard #3 (foreground) prepares to spray.
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard5.jpg[/qimg][/URL]
Predictably, BlocTard #1 is knocked on her ass.
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard8.jpg[/qimg]
With BlocTard #1 on her ass and the TrumpTard moving off:
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard10.jpg[/qimg][/URL]
And a second TrumpTard reigning in his colleague:
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard11.jpg[/qimg][/URL]
BlocTards #2 and #3 strike.
[qimg]http://i1233.photobucket.com/albums/ff387/AJM8125/BlocTard12.jpg[/qimg]
No need to show the outcome, which we know has BlocTard #3 tackled and released while BlocTard #2 attempting an escape only to be clotheslined and subjected to a barrage of girly punches at the hands of another TrumpTard.
Preponderance of the evidence shows:
While it's true the TrumpTards did in fact push through the BlocTard wall and in doing so they very likely initiated hostilities, the record shows that the BlocTards acted in retaliation rather than in self defense. This is confirmed by the actions of BlocTard #1, who is seen as the aggressor at least twice during the incident. Additionally it is noted that BlocTards #2 and #3, who weren't physically engaged with any TrumpTard, used their pepper spray in retaliation for BlocTard #1 getting knocked on her ass. This I believe is an illegal use of pepper spray under California law.
OC authorities filed no charges, FWIW.
Verdict:
Everyone's a 'tard here, especially me for posting this **** like it'll make a flying **** of a difference.
Do you have a link for the vid that you pulled the stills from? I found the first (ANTIFA rocked), but not the second. Your narrative contains quite a bit of info not pictured, for instance that the protesters were retaliating and that these events were related to the Wall of Doom (they took place at different times and places). From what I can see, the stills are from the immediate aftermath of the pro-Trump attack that ended in the pepper spraying.
Another reporting from The Mercury News, regarding the Menacing Wall of Doom:
More confirmation that The Wall did happen...but was utterly inconsequential and apparently unrelated to the violence that the Trump supporters were filmed as delivering to the protesters...and photographers...and journalists...
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/03/25/huntington-beach-fight-breaks-out-at-pro-trump-rally/
Sure.
The grabs are from the video you link to in this post:
AJM8125 said:Which was a direct consequence and entirely related to the provocation by the BlocTard's attempt to interfere with the TrumpTard's rally. The Trumptards, their feeble little egos fueled up on media fed BS like the wannabe "anarchist" attack at UC Berkeley, were spoiling for a fight and the BlocTards willingly obliged simply by showing up.
Mercury News said:At one point, about 10 organizers stood across the bike path, creating a human wall to stop the march. The marchers either pushed through or walked around them.
AJM8125 said:Nobody can claim self defense here and there was aggression on both sides especially when we can see BlocTard #1 going out of her way to slap two people and the illegal use of pepper spray that followed in retaliation.
They're all a bunch of idiots.
Everyone's a 'tard here, especially me for posting this **** like it'll make a flying **** of a difference.

Maybe it all would have worked out better if someone had just brought some Pepsi.![]()
Are you crazy? Do you know how many people died in the last Cola War?![]()
On the fronts or in the Pepsico internment camps?
Whoa, whoa, whoa...<snip>
The peppers can absolutely claim justifiable defense of another, using Cali-legal spray. Yes, one Blocktard slapped a Trumptard, and I'm pretty sure there was some of that going around on both sides (after all, the opening battery may well have been the Trumptards shoving through the Blocktards). The use of pepper spray is in no sense illegal when used in defense of another, here defending against Trumptard 0.