The Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: Part 24

Status
Not open for further replies.
...and backed up with other evidence: phone logs, luminol footprints, mixed DNA, and the myriad of lies.

Ummmm...no. Only if you believe that the cell phone tower doesn't cover the area it actually does, TMB negative means blood is present, mixed DNA has to occur at the same time and no one ever becomes confused and memory is like a video recording.

In other words, you ignore what scientific facts have established.
 
Last edited:
You may have missed this clause in my post:

"the Marasca MR does not reason that Knox's presence in the cottage at the time of the murder is a certainty"

and in fact, the Marasca MR is absolutely certain that Knox was not in the murder room, and furthermore was neither protecting Guede nor herself by her (coerced) statements against Lumumba. They are not in agreement with Nencini, but don't dispute that Nencini's conclusion from Knox's statements during the (coercive) interrogation that she was in the cottage at the time of the murder. I believe that the Marasca MR does not agree that she had contact with Kercher's blood. What the Marasca MR does not discuss is the possibility that Knox's statements during the interrogation were indeed coerced, as she maintained throughout the trials. The point is that the Italian courts tend to protect officials such as the police who have committed, or are alleged to have committed, official misconduct.

You are correct, I did miss that. Apologies.
 
Speaking of conspiracies, there's been an increase in the number of Americans turned away at the Canadian border (Amanda Knox apparently was not one of them, "sorry" to disappoint you, guilters):

"The number of American citizens turned away at the Canadian border has reportedly jumped significantly in recent years.

Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) figures obtained by Montreal newspaper La Presse suggest 31% more US citizens were turned away last year than 2015.

In 2016, 30,233 Americans were sent back at the boundary compared to 23,052 the year before. ...."

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39449515
 
Speaking of conspiracies, there's been an increase in the number of Americans turned away at the Canadian border (Amanda Knox apparently was not one of them, "sorry" to disappoint you, guilters):

"The number of American citizens turned away at the Canadian border has reportedly jumped significantly in recent years.

Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) figures obtained by Montreal newspaper La Presse suggest 31% more US citizens were turned away last year than 2015.

In 2016, 30,233 Americans were sent back at the boundary compared to 23,052 the year before. ...."

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39449515


Bravo, so a convicted felon evaded the Canadian border guards. Well done! We can trust the PIP to feel proud of it.
 
Perhaps you can point to OJ Simpson's appearances at exonerees conferences because I have to say I haven't noticed any, what with him being in prison and all.

I guess you made it up, as usual.

Who thinks like this person? There is absolutely not a drop of integrity in these posts.

Never mind that Italy DOESN'T have felonies. So why would anyone refer to Amanda as a felon? Someone attempting to deceive perhaps?
 
His advocate, Barry Scheck, is making $'millions out of calling vacated convictions 'exoneration'.

How do you know how much money Barry Scheck makes? That's right, this is more crap shooting out your ass.

It really stinks in here.
 
Last edited:
How do you know how much money Barry Scheck makes? That's right, this is more crap shooting out your ass.

It really stinks in here.

You will have to translate that for me.

Ghoul lawyer Kathleen Zellner was bragging about making >£2m in fees last year. Such a blood-sucking vulture: she gives all other unscrupulous lawyers a bad name - not an easy feat! - she doesn't seriously believe 'The police framed Stephen Avery, Ryan Ferguson and Mario Cascarios'.

As the prosecutor said about Cascarios's latest demand for an 'Innocent Certificate' so that he can sue for millions (and no doubt this is the aim of Amanda Knox in her fake innocence gigs) :

“The defendant wishes to recast himself as the victim. He is not. The real victim is lying nameless in an unmarked, unhallowed grave. The defendant’s disinterest, deceit and contempt manifested during the investigation of a child’s disappearance from his family’s own store exposed his callousness and consciousness of guilty,” Kenneally said in his objection to the defense’s petition. “His evident involvement in that child’s demise and current pretensions of innocence, exposes his treachery.”

http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/2017/...ciaro-wants-certificate-of-innocence/a510ir1/
 
Last edited:
Bravo, so a convicted felon evaded the Canadian border guards. Well done! We can trust the PIP to feel proud of it.

"Windsor Law in the Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted and the Speakers Committee are proud to present, Amanda Knox!

Date and Location: Friday, March 10th at 1:00 pm in the MAIN MOOT COURT."

Source: Windsor Law DWC & Speakers' Committee facebook page.

Apparently fair-minded people are proud to hear from Amanda Knox.
 
You will have to translate that for me.

Ghoul lawyer Kathleen Zellner was bragging about making >£2m in fees last year. Such a blood-sucking vulture: she gives all other unscrupulous lawyers a bad name - not an easy feat! - she doesn't seriously believe 'The police framed Stephen Avery, Ryan Ferguson and Mario Cascarios'.

As the prosecutor said about Cascarios's latest demand for an 'Innocent Certificate' so that he can sue for millions (and no doubt this is the aim of Amanda Knox in her fake innocence gigs) :

“The defendant wishes to recast himself as the victim. He is not. The real victim is lying nameless in an unmarked, unhallowed grave. The defendant’s disinterest, deceit and contempt manifested during the investigation of a child’s disappearance from his family’s own store exposed his callousness and consciousness of guilty,” Kenneally said in his objection to the defense’s petition. “His evident involvement in that child’s demise and current pretensions of innocence, exposes his treachery.”

http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/2017/...ciaro-wants-certificate-of-innocence/a510ir1/

I don't know who those people are but a lot of people run their mouths with little or no commitment to telling the truth. Surely you can understand that people don't always tell the truth.
 
"Windsor Law in the Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted and the Speakers Committee are proud to present, Amanda Knox!

Date and Location: Friday, March 10th at 1:00 pm in the MAIN MOOT COURT."

Source: Windsor Law DWC & Speakers' Committee facebook page.

Apparently fair-minded people are proud to hear from Amanda Knox.

Self-praise is no recommendation.
 
His advocate, Barry Scheck, is making $'millions out of calling vacated convictions 'exoneration'.

Citation, please, to support your quoted statement regarding Barry Scheck.

Not that your statement about Scheck is directly relevant to the topic of this thread, but if you are attempting a diversion because you have no thread-topic relevant information to post, at least provide a citation to lend your calumny some credibility.
 
I don't know who those people are but a lot of people run their mouths with little or no commitment to telling the truth. Surely you can understand that people don't always tell the truth.

Police get to investigate a case.

I promise you, they have better things to do with their time than frame innocent people.
 
Citation, please, to support your quoted statement regarding Barry Scheck.

Not that your statement about Scheck is directly relevant to the topic of this thread, but if you are attempting a diversion because you have no thread-topic relevant information to post, at least provide a citation to lend your calumny some credibility.

Hell will freeze first Numbers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom