You are the 'pollution' to this debate - claiming that Rudy is to blame for everything.
Oh *********** hell. (And by the way, you're on very shaky ground calling "me" pollution to the debate, rather than my arguments/opinions. Be careful.)
Thing is, Vixen, it's all (tellingly) in your mind that you think I'm claiming that "Rudy is to blame for everything". But at this point, I'm not in the least bit surprised at that type of sophistry.
My actual position (read back to check if you like, since you seem woefully uninformed on the matter) is that 1) there is zero credible, reliable evidence that Knox or Sollecito participated in the murder in any way; 2) there is more than enough credible, reliable evidence to prove BARD that Guede was at the very least a major participant in the murder; 3) all of the credible, reliable evidence is in fact wholly consistent with Guede acting alone; 4) all of the credible, reliable evidence tends to support the notion that Knox and Sollecito spent that evening/night together alone in Sollecito's apartment (and at the same time, there's zero credible, reliable evidence that Knox went out early the following morning to visit Quintavalle's shop); 5) the most reasonable conclusion to draw, in th light of all of that, is that Guede probably committed this sex murder alone, and that Knox and Sollecito almost certainly had nothing to do with it.
So, please don't misrepresent my position again, Vixen. OK? OK.
So the aborted connection to Abbey National becomes, 'That was Rudy trying out the bank bur forgot the country code'.
Another grotesque misrepresentation of my position. Again, I'm hardly surprised, but it's still disgusting and dishonest "argumentation" on your part. For the record, once again, my position on the aborted connection to Abbey (and the 901 voicemail number - or are you ignorant of that event too....?) is that whoever was operating Kercher's phone at that point made a number of sequenced, deliberate button pushes over at least a 2-minute period, resulting in the known evidence of those two auto-aborted calls. My position is actually that whoever was holding the phone was in fact trying (unsuccessfully) to turn off the handset or place into mute mode. Nothing to do with "Rudy", or "trying out the bank" or "forgot the country code". Once again, despicable but unsurprising.
We do know as a SCIENTIFIC FACT that both Amanda and Raff turned off their phones for the duration of the murder.
Oh dear oh dear oh dear oh dear. Once again, your scientific illiteracy shines through. Actually, what we know as a SCIENTIFIC FACT is that neither Knox's nor Sollecito's phone was connected to their respective networks over that time period. You're stunningly unaware that this can happen for a whole variety of reasons - only one of which is the manual turning off of the handset itself.
Knox states that she turned off her phone once she responded to Lumumba's text allowing her the night off (which reasonable observers would regard as perfectly plausible - but not you of course....), but it's highly feasible that Sollecito's handset remained switched on but dropped the signal - Sollecito lived in the heart of Old Perugia, in a thick stone building surrounded by other thick stone buildings in very close proximity. If you knew anything at all about cellular network topography and electromagnetic signal propagation (which, based on all the evidence, you clearly don't), you'd know that the position, topography and construction of Sollecito's apartment building actually made it rather likely that any mobile phone placed within certain areas of his apartment would experience signal drop-outs (often lengthy ones).
But hey, no! Let's just go with the pejorative, scientifically ignorant and illiterate myth that the evidence PROVES that the evil Knox and Sollecito necessarily deliberately switched off their phones (since, y'see, they were planning a heinous attack on Mezza, and this was all part of their evil plan.....)
