• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
"The guts" apparently being the company's press release?

Yes. You can tell because the quote starts: "Seaway Crude Pipeline Co LLC said..."

The second quote is from TxDOT, but being an oil-friendly state, that's probably not trustworthy either. What do the local indians have to say?

Time after time, they do some surface level cleanup and move on. Out of sight, out of mind...

Link?
It's going to be hard to "move on" in this case, since they are still running the pipeline. What we might do is require the oil company purchase the land where the oil spilled - at top dollar. That way, they literally own the problem.

If they bought a hundred acres around the blot, they could test oil-munching bacteria on it and track long-term consequences instead of having to scramble to clean things up. Put up a fence to keep it all private like so no one could squawk.
 
Yes. You can tell because the quote starts: "Seaway Crude Pipeline Co LLC said..."

The second quote is from TxDOT, but being an oil-friendly state, that's probably not trustworthy either. What do the local indians have to say?



Link?
It's going to be hard to "move on" in this case, since they are still running the pipeline. What we might do is require the oil company purchase the land where the oil spilled - at top dollar. That way, they literally own the problem.

If they bought a hundred acres around the blot, they could test oil-munching bacteria on it and track long-term consequences instead of having to scramble to clean things up. Put up a fence to keep it all private like so no one could squawk.

Will the fence prevent groundwater contamination, as well, or would that just be another one of those 'looks good on the surface' kind of solutions?

A link? To hundreds if not thousands of examples of inadequate cleanup?

You're either familiar with this issue and know the pattern, are capable of educating yourself about it, or don't care to believe it.

Physician, heal thyself.
 
Will the fence prevent groundwater contamination, as well, or would that just be another one of those 'looks good on the surface' kind of solutions?

I don't know how the hydrology works in that area, so I can't answer your question.

A link? To hundreds if not thousands of examples of inadequate cleanup?

My mistake, I thought you had something specific in mind. I suppose it pivots on what "adequate" is supposed to mean. I don't track oil spills, so the ones I can think of - Louisiana gulf spill by BP, Exxon-Valdez - were, as far as I know, "adequately" cleaned up. But those were in water, so maybe it's much different on land.

You're either familiar with this issue and know the pattern, are capable of educating yourself about it, or don't care to believe it.

Physician, heal thyself.

This reads a lot like, "If you understood what I understand, you'd agree with me." Which is probably so. It usually is.
 
My mistake, I thought you had something specific in mind. I suppose it pivots on what "adequate" is supposed to mean. I don't track oil spills, so the ones I can think of - Louisiana gulf spill by BP, Exxon-Valdez - were, as far as I know, "adequately" cleaned up. But those were in water, so maybe it's much different on land.

Deepwater Horizon?

Dispersants don't disperse. In fact they bond the contaminants so they'll sink under the surface (out of sight...). Massive mile-long dead zones were tracked moving through the gulf. Tar balls washed up on shores. They wouldn't let news crews on the beaches where cleanup was happening (local LEOs turned them away). They refused to provide, or even allow workers to wear their own provided skin/eye/respiratory gear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepw...tainment.2C_collection_and_use_of_dispersants

Underwater injection of Corexit into the leak may have created the oil plumes which were discovered below the surface.[138] Because the dispersants were applied at depth, much of the oil never rose to the surface.[147] One plume was 22 miles (35 km) long, more than a mile wide and 650 feet (200 m) deep.[148] In a major study on the plume, experts were most concerned about the slow pace at which the oil was breaking down in the cold, 40 °F (4 °C) water at depths of 3,000 feet (910 m).[149]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill#Access_restrictions

Local and federal authorities citing BP's authority denied access to members of the press attempting to document the spill from the air, from boats, and on the ground, blocking access to areas that were open to the public.[170][175][176][177][178][179][180] In some cases photographers were granted access only with BP officials escorting them on BP-contracted boats and aircraft. In one example, the U.S. Coast Guard stopped Jean-Michel Cousteau's boat and allowed it to proceed only after the Coast Guard was assured that no journalists were on board.[177] In another example, a CBS News crew was denied access to the oil-covered beaches of the spill area. The CBS crew was told by the authorities: "this is BP's rules, not ours," when trying to film the area.[177][181][182] Some members of Congress criticized the restrictions placed on access by journalists.[170]

Valdez? Seriously?!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Valdez_oil_spill#Clean-up_and_environmental_impact

Plenty of studies linked there. Some estimates say there's still 100+ tons of oil left.

Environmental Impact Assessments are turned in for new drilling projects that are clearly just boiler plate copy-pastes of other studies. I seem to recall one that was filed for arctic drilling that included something about impact on Manatees. Manatees live in tropical zones, not polar.

The technology for cleanup hasn't changed in 50 years. Some floating booms, some giant paper towel things, maybe some surface skimmers. About the only thing that has changed is the (supposed) dispersants which, having seen their effects, might actually be worse than not using them at all (except for the fact that it tends to be very effective at preventing visible evidence of oil on the surface of the water).

One could call this "environmental cleanup theater."
 
Last edited:
It worked. I was fooled into thinking people were once again using the gulf for fishing and whatever they used the gulf for before the BP spill. They are very tricky.

http://www.ibtimes.com/bp-oil-spill...ars-after-deepwater-horizon-explosion-1883832

Before the BP oil spill ravaged Louisiana’s marshlands, Randy Borne pulled in 70 dozen wire crates a day of squirming blue crabs. His traps dotted the swampy waters behind his house near Golden Meadow, a sprawling bayou town 80 miles south of New Orleans.

But five years after the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history sent millions of gallons of crude spewing into the Gulf of Mexico, Borne says his crab catch has dwindled dramatically. Now, he usually lugs in only about 12 dozen crates’ worth of crabs each day.

“Every year is worse and worse. I'm hardly catching nothing,” he says in a thick Cajun accent from under the shade of his seafood shed. “I think the crabs got affected the most.”

Further down Louisiana Highway 1, to the point where land melts into the Gulf, popular beaches and fishing spots remain closed to visitors as restoration work continues. In Grand Isle, a beach town that suffered the brunt of the spill, thick globs of pudding-like oil still blanket the shores from time to time.

Across the Barataria Bay, in the tiny fishing village of Pointe a la Hache, a once-bustling marina has grown still after the flood of oil and cleanup efforts killed off most of the oyster reefs. Here, Brian Harvey runs Beshel’s Boat Launch, a supply shop that stocks snacks and soda upstairs and boat equipment down below. With the oysters gone, Harvey says he has half as many customers in a given month. “We used to have about 60 to 70 boats fishing here. Now it’s about 10 or 12 shrimping boats,” he says from behind the store counter.

So yes. You have been fooled.
 

And they are still trying to fool us!
"Beck, a biologist with the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, presented numbers Thursday showing that private-lease oyster harvests in 2015 set a record, producing more than 12 million pounds of oyster meat for the first time ever.

When combined with the harvest from public grounds, the industry brought in more than 14 million pounds of oyster meat, one of only three times in the last 55 years the industry cleared that benchmark. The long-term average for annual oyster harvest is 11.16 million pounds.

That, obviously, is the good news.

The bad news is that, although the harvest is up, the oyster stock has certainly seen better days. A recently completed stock assessment shows there are 19.3 percent fewer barrels of oysters available in the water today than there were last year, and that wasn't a great year by any stretch.

This year's stock, Beck said, is an astounding 72.4 percent below the long-term average, and it's actually worse than that. The oyster stock has been below the long-term average since 2005."
http://www.nola.com/outdoors/index.ssf/2016/09/louisiana_oyster_harvest_up_bu.html
 
All Eyes on Standing Rock: The World Is Watching

Yesterday camp leaders met with representatives from the Army Corps of Engineers to discuss an evacuation plan. Again, they requested an extension of the deadline to leave camp—for several weeks, in anticipation of spring thaw, protectors have voluntarily been clearing out and cleaning up camp in an effort to relocate to higher ground, but efforts have been hampered by the effects of one of North Dakota’s harshest winters, marked by sustained subzero temperatures and multiple blizzards, and the arrival of unusually warm temperatures that brought on early snowmelt and treacherous mud. A heated dome that served as a camp landmark and community space was dismantled; volunteers used an ice pick to break down frozen piles of donations, to gather and redistribute them to those in other reservations and communities. The request for an extension to remain and complete cleanup was denied.

Well, the part about the dome is not quite right.

According to a "Justin Riley" on a FB post on Feb 20:

Well, if anyone needed another reason to hate the US government and dedicate their lives to bringing it into accountability, here is a personal one. When the caretaker of the dome we loaned to offer winter housing for The Standing Rock Water Protectors Camp was heading to take it down today in time for the Feb 22nd eviction deadline, this is what he found this morning. **** the US government and **** the world of hate and oppression it supports, holds up, enforces and propagates.

And a photo from when we first built her years ago. RIP.

And while we truly appreciate the offers of donations, the best place for financial support inspired by this is to the Native-Based resistance support itself: http://lakotalaw.org is a great organization. If you want to help with the physical labor of rebuilding the dome in the PNW you can send me a private message.

dome.jpg

I have a friend who went there last month to do cleanup work. She wrote her latest poetry book in that dome.

The tribal council was in the midst of planning to lease heavy cleanup equipment from a tribe in a neighboring state. Suddenly Morton County is doing it instead...and inviting "journalists" to come take pictures of the "mess left behind"...after arranging it in large piles for maximum visual effect. I've seen this tactic at protests with my own eyes. Sudden middle of the night police raid, everyone needs to be held away from camp for "safety", leave your stuff, we'll bring you back when we've finished our sweep. Razor blade the tents, smash the electronics, have "approved" news people take pictures...okay, you can come back now, have a good night's sleep!
 
Last edited:
Speaking of controlling the media:

Preparing to leave, Standing Rock protesters ceremonially burn camp

Authorities in North Dakota on Tuesday issued restrictions on media covering the camp evacuation, for the first time imposing a requirement for credentials issued by police. Criteria for credentials include agreement to follow instructions from police, to only work in designated areas and submission of a letter of assignment from “legitimate” news outlets, excluding any freelance reporters or photographers without such a letter. The requirements were issued under threat of arrest and revocation of the credential.

The restrictions were protested by the Society of Professional Journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists, and other organizations representing the working press.

I don't need a permit to be a journalist and by the way, who gets to decide what is or is not a "legitimate" news outlet? So I have to get a credential that essentially says I can't cover this story any way other than the way you want it covered otherwise you'll take the credential away.

Uh...? Thanks but no thanks.

Also, to clear up some confusion I've seen over the fires:

Surrounded on all sides by roadblocks and under threat of arrest, demonstrators against the Dakota Access Pipeline have invoked an old ally: fire.

Used by native people ceremonially since time immemorial to heal and to cleanse, demonstrators are setting ablaze their tents, tepees and other structures remaining from a protest encampment since last summer as they leave the camp under threat of arrest Wednesday.

“People have said their last prayers, and offered cedar to the sacred fire and are also burning these structures we have ceremonially built, so they must be ceremonially removed,” said Vanessa Castle of the Lower Elwha Klallam tribe. “They cannot be bulldozed, no other hands or malice of bad intentions can touch them.”
 
I've been wanting to hold a virtual purification ceremony online. The idea is to get as many people as possible to agree on a set time for silence and contemplation. Only by ritually thanking Mother Earth for her generous gift of energetic oil, that which feeds and nourishes our economy, only then can we remove any negativity and restore balance.

Please join me in sending your own positive vibrations to the site and help bring this to a peaceful, productive conclusion. Simply envision the ebony hydrocarbons flowing freely through unrestricted pipeline, aided in their journey by the spiritual intercession of our ancestors who died to bring us such a bounty.

Thank you.
 
To date, the federal law enforcement response to the Standing Rock protests has been much more measured than the state and county law enforcement response.

I wonder if that may change.

National Parks Traveler: UPDATED: National Park Service Law Enforcement Rangers Being Called To Standing Rock

Three different sources within the agency, speaking on the condition that they not be identified as they were not authorized to discuss the call-up, confirmed the deployment to the Traveler. A deployment order obtained by the Traveler notes that the rangers are set to arrive in North Dakota on Sunday, February 19, and depart on March 6. They will assist the Department of the Interior "in a humanitarian effort to maintain public safety, protection of property, peace and order as it relates to encampments located on Reservation land," the order states. It says personnel should bring available riot gear, including gas masks, as well as "night vision, thermal scopes, and any other useful items."
 
And in other news ...

Vets on their way to help with the clean up encounter some local cops, mention that they are going to Standing Rock and suddenly the cops find cause to search their car. A minute quantity of marijuana was found. They were arrested, the car was confiscated, as well as camping equipment and cold weather clothes which were described to the press as "protest gear".
 

Back
Top Bottom